Prognostic value of human equilibrative nucleoside transporter1 in pancreatic cancer receiving gemcitabin-based chemotherapy: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The potential prognostic value of human equilibrative nucleoside transporter1 in pancreatic cancer receiving gemcitabine-based chemotherapy is variably reported. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review of literature evaluating human equilibrative nucleos...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhu-Qing Liu, Ying-Chao Han, Xi Zhang, Li Chu, Jue-Min Fang, Hua-Xin Zhao, Yi-Jing Chen, Qing Xu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3903621?pdf=render
_version_ 1830517808996286464
author Zhu-Qing Liu
Ying-Chao Han
Xi Zhang
Li Chu
Jue-Min Fang
Hua-Xin Zhao
Yi-Jing Chen
Qing Xu
author_facet Zhu-Qing Liu
Ying-Chao Han
Xi Zhang
Li Chu
Jue-Min Fang
Hua-Xin Zhao
Yi-Jing Chen
Qing Xu
author_sort Zhu-Qing Liu
collection DOAJ
description BACKGROUND: The potential prognostic value of human equilibrative nucleoside transporter1 in pancreatic cancer receiving gemcitabine-based chemotherapy is variably reported. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review of literature evaluating human equilibrative nucleoside transporter1 expression as a prognostic factor in pancreatic cancer receiving gemcitabine-based chemotherapy and to conduct a subsequent meta-analysis to quantify the overall prognostic effect. METHODS: Related studies were identified and evaluated for quality through multiple search strategies. Only studies analyzing pancreatic cancer receiving gemcitabine-based chemotherapy were eligible for inclusion. Data were collected from studies comparing overall, disease-free and progression-free survival (OS, DFS and PFS) in patients with low human equilibrative nucleoside transporter1 levels and those having high levels. The hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were used to assess the strength of associations. Hazard ratios greater than 1 reflect adverse survival associated with low human equilibrative nucleoside transporter1 levels. RESULTS: A total of 12 studies (n = 875) were involved in this meta-analysis (12 for OS, 5 for DFS, 3 for PFS). For overall and disease-free survival, the pooled HRs of human equilibrative nucleoside transporter1 were significant at 2.93 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2.37-3.64) and 2.67 (95% CI, 1.87-3.81), respectively. For progression-free survival, the pooled HR in higher human equilibrative nucleoside transporter1 expression in pancreatic cancer receiving gemcitabine-based chemotherapy was 2.76 (95% CI, 1.76-4.34). No evidence of significant heterogeneity or publication bias was seen in any of these studies. CONCLUSION: These results support the case for a low human equilibrative nucleoside transporter1 level representing a significant and reproducible marker of adverse prognosis in pancreatic cancer receiving gemcitabine-based chemotherapy.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T04:08:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ab9885a8f12e4b07989576aebb37cdf9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T04:08:17Z
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-ab9885a8f12e4b07989576aebb37cdf92022-12-21T18:39:35ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0191e8710310.1371/journal.pone.0087103Prognostic value of human equilibrative nucleoside transporter1 in pancreatic cancer receiving gemcitabin-based chemotherapy: a meta-analysis.Zhu-Qing LiuYing-Chao HanXi ZhangLi ChuJue-Min FangHua-Xin ZhaoYi-Jing ChenQing XuBACKGROUND: The potential prognostic value of human equilibrative nucleoside transporter1 in pancreatic cancer receiving gemcitabine-based chemotherapy is variably reported. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review of literature evaluating human equilibrative nucleoside transporter1 expression as a prognostic factor in pancreatic cancer receiving gemcitabine-based chemotherapy and to conduct a subsequent meta-analysis to quantify the overall prognostic effect. METHODS: Related studies were identified and evaluated for quality through multiple search strategies. Only studies analyzing pancreatic cancer receiving gemcitabine-based chemotherapy were eligible for inclusion. Data were collected from studies comparing overall, disease-free and progression-free survival (OS, DFS and PFS) in patients with low human equilibrative nucleoside transporter1 levels and those having high levels. The hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence interval (95%CI) were used to assess the strength of associations. Hazard ratios greater than 1 reflect adverse survival associated with low human equilibrative nucleoside transporter1 levels. RESULTS: A total of 12 studies (n = 875) were involved in this meta-analysis (12 for OS, 5 for DFS, 3 for PFS). For overall and disease-free survival, the pooled HRs of human equilibrative nucleoside transporter1 were significant at 2.93 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2.37-3.64) and 2.67 (95% CI, 1.87-3.81), respectively. For progression-free survival, the pooled HR in higher human equilibrative nucleoside transporter1 expression in pancreatic cancer receiving gemcitabine-based chemotherapy was 2.76 (95% CI, 1.76-4.34). No evidence of significant heterogeneity or publication bias was seen in any of these studies. CONCLUSION: These results support the case for a low human equilibrative nucleoside transporter1 level representing a significant and reproducible marker of adverse prognosis in pancreatic cancer receiving gemcitabine-based chemotherapy.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3903621?pdf=render
spellingShingle Zhu-Qing Liu
Ying-Chao Han
Xi Zhang
Li Chu
Jue-Min Fang
Hua-Xin Zhao
Yi-Jing Chen
Qing Xu
Prognostic value of human equilibrative nucleoside transporter1 in pancreatic cancer receiving gemcitabin-based chemotherapy: a meta-analysis.
PLoS ONE
title Prognostic value of human equilibrative nucleoside transporter1 in pancreatic cancer receiving gemcitabin-based chemotherapy: a meta-analysis.
title_full Prognostic value of human equilibrative nucleoside transporter1 in pancreatic cancer receiving gemcitabin-based chemotherapy: a meta-analysis.
title_fullStr Prognostic value of human equilibrative nucleoside transporter1 in pancreatic cancer receiving gemcitabin-based chemotherapy: a meta-analysis.
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic value of human equilibrative nucleoside transporter1 in pancreatic cancer receiving gemcitabin-based chemotherapy: a meta-analysis.
title_short Prognostic value of human equilibrative nucleoside transporter1 in pancreatic cancer receiving gemcitabin-based chemotherapy: a meta-analysis.
title_sort prognostic value of human equilibrative nucleoside transporter1 in pancreatic cancer receiving gemcitabin based chemotherapy a meta analysis
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3903621?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT zhuqingliu prognosticvalueofhumanequilibrativenucleosidetransporter1inpancreaticcancerreceivinggemcitabinbasedchemotherapyametaanalysis
AT yingchaohan prognosticvalueofhumanequilibrativenucleosidetransporter1inpancreaticcancerreceivinggemcitabinbasedchemotherapyametaanalysis
AT xizhang prognosticvalueofhumanequilibrativenucleosidetransporter1inpancreaticcancerreceivinggemcitabinbasedchemotherapyametaanalysis
AT lichu prognosticvalueofhumanequilibrativenucleosidetransporter1inpancreaticcancerreceivinggemcitabinbasedchemotherapyametaanalysis
AT jueminfang prognosticvalueofhumanequilibrativenucleosidetransporter1inpancreaticcancerreceivinggemcitabinbasedchemotherapyametaanalysis
AT huaxinzhao prognosticvalueofhumanequilibrativenucleosidetransporter1inpancreaticcancerreceivinggemcitabinbasedchemotherapyametaanalysis
AT yijingchen prognosticvalueofhumanequilibrativenucleosidetransporter1inpancreaticcancerreceivinggemcitabinbasedchemotherapyametaanalysis
AT qingxu prognosticvalueofhumanequilibrativenucleosidetransporter1inpancreaticcancerreceivinggemcitabinbasedchemotherapyametaanalysis