An Alternating, Current-Induced Electromagnetic Field for Membrane Fouling and Scaling Control during Desalination of Secondary Effluent from Municipal Wastewater

Membrane treatment of secondary effluent for reuse applications is a promising approach to expand water supplies and provide flexibility to water resources management. However, effective control of membrane fouling and scaling is crucial for cost-effective treatment and system resilience. This study...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Juliano Penteado de Almeida, Zachary Stoll, Pei Xu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-06-01
Series:Water
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/15/12/2234
_version_ 1797592300175491072
author Juliano Penteado de Almeida
Zachary Stoll
Pei Xu
author_facet Juliano Penteado de Almeida
Zachary Stoll
Pei Xu
author_sort Juliano Penteado de Almeida
collection DOAJ
description Membrane treatment of secondary effluent for reuse applications is a promising approach to expand water supplies and provide flexibility to water resources management. However, effective control of membrane fouling and scaling is crucial for cost-effective treatment and system resilience. This study compared the performance of antiscalants to an alternating, current-induced electromagnetic field (EMF) as an alternative pretreatment method to reverse osmosis. Compared to the no-EMF control experiments, the EMF device resulted in 13% higher water recovery and 366% lower flux decline at 60% of water recovery, along with 2–8 times lower precipitation of fouling and scaling, as evidenced by scanning electron microscope, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, and chemical extraction analysis. The combination of the EMF with antiscalant was more effective for reducing membrane fouling and scaling, increasing water recoveries up to 89.3%, as compared to the EMF (67.5%) and antiscalant-only (73.6%) configurations. This is the first study to demonstrate synergistic effects of using an EMF in combination with antiscalants and could lead to lower pretreatment costs. Additional research is required to quantify the economics of this approach and to fully understand the fundamental mechanisms governing fouling and scaling control by an EMF.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T01:49:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-aba4c5fa09404af89ca782ede8971c97
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-4441
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T01:49:19Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Water
spelling doaj.art-aba4c5fa09404af89ca782ede8971c972023-11-18T13:05:09ZengMDPI AGWater2073-44412023-06-011512223410.3390/w15122234An Alternating, Current-Induced Electromagnetic Field for Membrane Fouling and Scaling Control during Desalination of Secondary Effluent from Municipal WastewaterJuliano Penteado de Almeida0Zachary Stoll1Pei Xu2Department of Civil Engineering, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USADepartment of Civil Engineering, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USADepartment of Civil Engineering, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM 88003, USAMembrane treatment of secondary effluent for reuse applications is a promising approach to expand water supplies and provide flexibility to water resources management. However, effective control of membrane fouling and scaling is crucial for cost-effective treatment and system resilience. This study compared the performance of antiscalants to an alternating, current-induced electromagnetic field (EMF) as an alternative pretreatment method to reverse osmosis. Compared to the no-EMF control experiments, the EMF device resulted in 13% higher water recovery and 366% lower flux decline at 60% of water recovery, along with 2–8 times lower precipitation of fouling and scaling, as evidenced by scanning electron microscope, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, and chemical extraction analysis. The combination of the EMF with antiscalant was more effective for reducing membrane fouling and scaling, increasing water recoveries up to 89.3%, as compared to the EMF (67.5%) and antiscalant-only (73.6%) configurations. This is the first study to demonstrate synergistic effects of using an EMF in combination with antiscalants and could lead to lower pretreatment costs. Additional research is required to quantify the economics of this approach and to fully understand the fundamental mechanisms governing fouling and scaling control by an EMF.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/15/12/2234electromagnetic field (EMF)reverse osmosis (RO)municipal wastewater reclamationmembrane foulingmembrane scalingmembrane fouling characterization
spellingShingle Juliano Penteado de Almeida
Zachary Stoll
Pei Xu
An Alternating, Current-Induced Electromagnetic Field for Membrane Fouling and Scaling Control during Desalination of Secondary Effluent from Municipal Wastewater
Water
electromagnetic field (EMF)
reverse osmosis (RO)
municipal wastewater reclamation
membrane fouling
membrane scaling
membrane fouling characterization
title An Alternating, Current-Induced Electromagnetic Field for Membrane Fouling and Scaling Control during Desalination of Secondary Effluent from Municipal Wastewater
title_full An Alternating, Current-Induced Electromagnetic Field for Membrane Fouling and Scaling Control during Desalination of Secondary Effluent from Municipal Wastewater
title_fullStr An Alternating, Current-Induced Electromagnetic Field for Membrane Fouling and Scaling Control during Desalination of Secondary Effluent from Municipal Wastewater
title_full_unstemmed An Alternating, Current-Induced Electromagnetic Field for Membrane Fouling and Scaling Control during Desalination of Secondary Effluent from Municipal Wastewater
title_short An Alternating, Current-Induced Electromagnetic Field for Membrane Fouling and Scaling Control during Desalination of Secondary Effluent from Municipal Wastewater
title_sort alternating current induced electromagnetic field for membrane fouling and scaling control during desalination of secondary effluent from municipal wastewater
topic electromagnetic field (EMF)
reverse osmosis (RO)
municipal wastewater reclamation
membrane fouling
membrane scaling
membrane fouling characterization
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/15/12/2234
work_keys_str_mv AT julianopenteadodealmeida analternatingcurrentinducedelectromagneticfieldformembranefoulingandscalingcontrolduringdesalinationofsecondaryeffluentfrommunicipalwastewater
AT zacharystoll analternatingcurrentinducedelectromagneticfieldformembranefoulingandscalingcontrolduringdesalinationofsecondaryeffluentfrommunicipalwastewater
AT peixu analternatingcurrentinducedelectromagneticfieldformembranefoulingandscalingcontrolduringdesalinationofsecondaryeffluentfrommunicipalwastewater
AT julianopenteadodealmeida alternatingcurrentinducedelectromagneticfieldformembranefoulingandscalingcontrolduringdesalinationofsecondaryeffluentfrommunicipalwastewater
AT zacharystoll alternatingcurrentinducedelectromagneticfieldformembranefoulingandscalingcontrolduringdesalinationofsecondaryeffluentfrommunicipalwastewater
AT peixu alternatingcurrentinducedelectromagneticfieldformembranefoulingandscalingcontrolduringdesalinationofsecondaryeffluentfrommunicipalwastewater