Age and Growth of Striped Venus Clam Chamelea gallina (Linnaeus, 1758) in the Mid-Western Adriatic Sea: A Comparison of Three Laboratory Techniques

Age and growth studies provide critical data for clam fishery management. Three aging techniques, thin sections and acetate peel replicas – which involve shell sectioning – and surface growth rings were used to estimate the age and growth of Chamelea gallina populations in the mid-western Adriatic S...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Giada Bargione, Claudio Vasapollo, Fortunata Donato, Massimo Virgili, Andrea Petetta, Alessandro Lucchetti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Marine Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmars.2020.582703/full
_version_ 1818552468124991488
author Giada Bargione
Giada Bargione
Claudio Vasapollo
Fortunata Donato
Massimo Virgili
Andrea Petetta
Andrea Petetta
Alessandro Lucchetti
author_facet Giada Bargione
Giada Bargione
Claudio Vasapollo
Fortunata Donato
Massimo Virgili
Andrea Petetta
Andrea Petetta
Alessandro Lucchetti
author_sort Giada Bargione
collection DOAJ
description Age and growth studies provide critical data for clam fishery management. Three aging techniques, thin sections and acetate peel replicas – which involve shell sectioning – and surface growth rings were used to estimate the age and growth of Chamelea gallina populations in the mid-western Adriatic Sea. Their results were compared to identify the most reliable and least time-consuming approach. There were no significant differences between the two shell sectioning techniques (χ2 = 4.66, df = 3, p = 0.198), which were described by the same von Bertalanffy (VBF) growth curve parameters (L8 = 43.9, k = 0.26, t0 = −0.84), whereas significantly different L8 and k values were found between the two shell sectioning techniques and surface growth rings (L8: χ2 = 13.62, df = 1, p < 0.001; k: χ2 = 9.18, df = 1, p < 0.002; these statistics refer to the comparison between acetate peels and surface growth rings). The latter approach proved unreliable and error-prone, as it underestimated age and overestimated the growth rate (L8 = 26.4, k = 1.91, t0 = −0.11). Although the thin sections and acetate peel techniques both provide reliable age and growth estimates, the former approach was less time-consuming. Our analyses demonstrated that shell growth is slower in the cold season and in older specimens and that it has slowed down over the past few decades.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T09:13:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-abace92ff8d046919f06e6124e174f76
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-7745
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T09:13:35Z
publishDate 2020-09-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Marine Science
spelling doaj.art-abace92ff8d046919f06e6124e174f762022-12-22T00:29:27ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Marine Science2296-77452020-09-01710.3389/fmars.2020.582703582703Age and Growth of Striped Venus Clam Chamelea gallina (Linnaeus, 1758) in the Mid-Western Adriatic Sea: A Comparison of Three Laboratory TechniquesGiada Bargione0Giada Bargione1Claudio Vasapollo2Fortunata Donato3Massimo Virgili4Andrea Petetta5Andrea Petetta6Alessandro Lucchetti7Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, ItalyInstitute for Biological Resources and Marine Biotechnologies, National Research Council, Ancona, ItalyInstitute for Biological Resources and Marine Biotechnologies, National Research Council, Ancona, ItalyInstitute for Biological Resources and Marine Biotechnologies, National Research Council, Ancona, ItalyInstitute for Biological Resources and Marine Biotechnologies, National Research Council, Ancona, ItalyDepartment of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, ItalyInstitute for Biological Resources and Marine Biotechnologies, National Research Council, Ancona, ItalyInstitute for Biological Resources and Marine Biotechnologies, National Research Council, Ancona, ItalyAge and growth studies provide critical data for clam fishery management. Three aging techniques, thin sections and acetate peel replicas – which involve shell sectioning – and surface growth rings were used to estimate the age and growth of Chamelea gallina populations in the mid-western Adriatic Sea. Their results were compared to identify the most reliable and least time-consuming approach. There were no significant differences between the two shell sectioning techniques (χ2 = 4.66, df = 3, p = 0.198), which were described by the same von Bertalanffy (VBF) growth curve parameters (L8 = 43.9, k = 0.26, t0 = −0.84), whereas significantly different L8 and k values were found between the two shell sectioning techniques and surface growth rings (L8: χ2 = 13.62, df = 1, p < 0.001; k: χ2 = 9.18, df = 1, p < 0.002; these statistics refer to the comparison between acetate peels and surface growth rings). The latter approach proved unreliable and error-prone, as it underestimated age and overestimated the growth rate (L8 = 26.4, k = 1.91, t0 = −0.11). Although the thin sections and acetate peel techniques both provide reliable age and growth estimates, the former approach was less time-consuming. Our analyses demonstrated that shell growth is slower in the cold season and in older specimens and that it has slowed down over the past few decades.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmars.2020.582703/fullstriped venus clamagegrowththin sectionsacetate peelssurface growth rings
spellingShingle Giada Bargione
Giada Bargione
Claudio Vasapollo
Fortunata Donato
Massimo Virgili
Andrea Petetta
Andrea Petetta
Alessandro Lucchetti
Age and Growth of Striped Venus Clam Chamelea gallina (Linnaeus, 1758) in the Mid-Western Adriatic Sea: A Comparison of Three Laboratory Techniques
Frontiers in Marine Science
striped venus clam
age
growth
thin sections
acetate peels
surface growth rings
title Age and Growth of Striped Venus Clam Chamelea gallina (Linnaeus, 1758) in the Mid-Western Adriatic Sea: A Comparison of Three Laboratory Techniques
title_full Age and Growth of Striped Venus Clam Chamelea gallina (Linnaeus, 1758) in the Mid-Western Adriatic Sea: A Comparison of Three Laboratory Techniques
title_fullStr Age and Growth of Striped Venus Clam Chamelea gallina (Linnaeus, 1758) in the Mid-Western Adriatic Sea: A Comparison of Three Laboratory Techniques
title_full_unstemmed Age and Growth of Striped Venus Clam Chamelea gallina (Linnaeus, 1758) in the Mid-Western Adriatic Sea: A Comparison of Three Laboratory Techniques
title_short Age and Growth of Striped Venus Clam Chamelea gallina (Linnaeus, 1758) in the Mid-Western Adriatic Sea: A Comparison of Three Laboratory Techniques
title_sort age and growth of striped venus clam chamelea gallina linnaeus 1758 in the mid western adriatic sea a comparison of three laboratory techniques
topic striped venus clam
age
growth
thin sections
acetate peels
surface growth rings
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmars.2020.582703/full
work_keys_str_mv AT giadabargione ageandgrowthofstripedvenusclamchameleagallinalinnaeus1758inthemidwesternadriaticseaacomparisonofthreelaboratorytechniques
AT giadabargione ageandgrowthofstripedvenusclamchameleagallinalinnaeus1758inthemidwesternadriaticseaacomparisonofthreelaboratorytechniques
AT claudiovasapollo ageandgrowthofstripedvenusclamchameleagallinalinnaeus1758inthemidwesternadriaticseaacomparisonofthreelaboratorytechniques
AT fortunatadonato ageandgrowthofstripedvenusclamchameleagallinalinnaeus1758inthemidwesternadriaticseaacomparisonofthreelaboratorytechniques
AT massimovirgili ageandgrowthofstripedvenusclamchameleagallinalinnaeus1758inthemidwesternadriaticseaacomparisonofthreelaboratorytechniques
AT andreapetetta ageandgrowthofstripedvenusclamchameleagallinalinnaeus1758inthemidwesternadriaticseaacomparisonofthreelaboratorytechniques
AT andreapetetta ageandgrowthofstripedvenusclamchameleagallinalinnaeus1758inthemidwesternadriaticseaacomparisonofthreelaboratorytechniques
AT alessandrolucchetti ageandgrowthofstripedvenusclamchameleagallinalinnaeus1758inthemidwesternadriaticseaacomparisonofthreelaboratorytechniques