The Tsar’s Capital without the Tsar According to Reports from St Petersburg to the Imperial Court of Vienna, 1716–1717

This article examines Peter I’s second journey to Western Europe from the perspective of the Imperial resident Otto von Pleyer, who stayed behind in the tsar’s new capital of St Petersburg and reported from there to the Imperial court of Vienna. What difference did it make, according to his reports...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Franziska Schedewie
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Ural Federal University 2018-09-01
Series:Quaestio Rossica
Subjects:
Online Access:https://qr.urfu.ru/ojs/index.php/qr/article/view/3323
_version_ 1818939530276765696
author Franziska Schedewie
author_facet Franziska Schedewie
author_sort Franziska Schedewie
collection DOAJ
description This article examines Peter I’s second journey to Western Europe from the perspective of the Imperial resident Otto von Pleyer, who stayed behind in the tsar’s new capital of St Petersburg and reported from there to the Imperial court of Vienna. What difference did it make, according to his reports, that the tsar was away on the road? Analysing two topics in the nineteen reports he made between February 1716 and October 1717 (the army, fleet, and the condition of the soldiers, as observed from St Petersburg, and artists, artisans, and architecture, especially the reception of the celebrated French architect Le Blond), the article concludes that themes of disharmony and dissipation on the one hand and accusations of irresponsibility and thoughtlessness on the other are so ubiquitous in Pleyer’s reports that they create the impression of an acute potential threat and homemade crisis. The vacuum caused by the absence of the tsar itself, by rumors, and by constant wondering what the next step was increase the impression of a permanent latent crisis, even without the ultimate climax in the form of the flight of Tsarevich Aleksei. Furthermore, a close analysis of the two selected topics shows that the political problems were not isolated, but interdependent on the social and cultural spheres. With its additional research focus, the article contributes to previous research, especially that by Paul Bushkovitch. Pleyer’s diplomatic reports convey a surprising degree of social criticism combined with a distinctive moral overtone. They provide a valuable source for the approaches of the New Diplomatic History.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T06:25:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-abc3e96d58ee4d928b7666ca47284426
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2311-911X
2313-6871
language deu
last_indexed 2024-12-20T06:25:13Z
publishDate 2018-09-01
publisher Ural Federal University
record_format Article
series Quaestio Rossica
spelling doaj.art-abc3e96d58ee4d928b7666ca472844262022-12-21T19:50:19ZdeuUral Federal UniversityQuaestio Rossica2311-911X2313-68712018-09-016310.15826/qr.2018.3.322The Tsar’s Capital without the Tsar According to Reports from St Petersburg to the Imperial Court of Vienna, 1716–1717Franziska Schedewie This article examines Peter I’s second journey to Western Europe from the perspective of the Imperial resident Otto von Pleyer, who stayed behind in the tsar’s new capital of St Petersburg and reported from there to the Imperial court of Vienna. What difference did it make, according to his reports, that the tsar was away on the road? Analysing two topics in the nineteen reports he made between February 1716 and October 1717 (the army, fleet, and the condition of the soldiers, as observed from St Petersburg, and artists, artisans, and architecture, especially the reception of the celebrated French architect Le Blond), the article concludes that themes of disharmony and dissipation on the one hand and accusations of irresponsibility and thoughtlessness on the other are so ubiquitous in Pleyer’s reports that they create the impression of an acute potential threat and homemade crisis. The vacuum caused by the absence of the tsar itself, by rumors, and by constant wondering what the next step was increase the impression of a permanent latent crisis, even without the ultimate climax in the form of the flight of Tsarevich Aleksei. Furthermore, a close analysis of the two selected topics shows that the political problems were not isolated, but interdependent on the social and cultural spheres. With its additional research focus, the article contributes to previous research, especially that by Paul Bushkovitch. Pleyer’s diplomatic reports convey a surprising degree of social criticism combined with a distinctive moral overtone. They provide a valuable source for the approaches of the New Diplomatic History. https://qr.urfu.ru/ojs/index.php/qr/article/view/3323New Diplomatic History; Peter I; Otto von Pleyer; Jean-Baptiste Alexandre Le Blond; Alexander Menshikov; St Petersburg
spellingShingle Franziska Schedewie
The Tsar’s Capital without the Tsar According to Reports from St Petersburg to the Imperial Court of Vienna, 1716–1717
Quaestio Rossica
New Diplomatic History; Peter I; Otto von Pleyer; Jean-Baptiste Alexandre Le Blond; Alexander Menshikov; St Petersburg
title The Tsar’s Capital without the Tsar According to Reports from St Petersburg to the Imperial Court of Vienna, 1716–1717
title_full The Tsar’s Capital without the Tsar According to Reports from St Petersburg to the Imperial Court of Vienna, 1716–1717
title_fullStr The Tsar’s Capital without the Tsar According to Reports from St Petersburg to the Imperial Court of Vienna, 1716–1717
title_full_unstemmed The Tsar’s Capital without the Tsar According to Reports from St Petersburg to the Imperial Court of Vienna, 1716–1717
title_short The Tsar’s Capital without the Tsar According to Reports from St Petersburg to the Imperial Court of Vienna, 1716–1717
title_sort tsar s capital without the tsar according to reports from st petersburg to the imperial court of vienna 1716 1717
topic New Diplomatic History; Peter I; Otto von Pleyer; Jean-Baptiste Alexandre Le Blond; Alexander Menshikov; St Petersburg
url https://qr.urfu.ru/ojs/index.php/qr/article/view/3323
work_keys_str_mv AT franziskaschedewie thetsarscapitalwithoutthetsaraccordingtoreportsfromstpetersburgtotheimperialcourtofvienna17161717
AT franziskaschedewie tsarscapitalwithoutthetsaraccordingtoreportsfromstpetersburgtotheimperialcourtofvienna17161717