Comparable long-term retention rates and effects on bone mineral density of denosumab treatment in patients with osteoporosis with or without autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases: real-life data

Objectives: To investigate whether concomitant autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIIRDs) represent a risk factor for denosumab discontinuation and to explore other possible predictors. Design: This is a real-life retrospective study conducted at our centre on consecutive patients who start...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Angelo Fassio, Davide Gatti, Davide Bertelle, Elena Fracassi, Giulia Zanetti, Ombretta Viapiana, Maurizio Rossini, Giovanni Adami
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2022-09-01
Series:Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1759720X221124543
_version_ 1798035720202354688
author Angelo Fassio
Davide Gatti
Davide Bertelle
Elena Fracassi
Giulia Zanetti
Ombretta Viapiana
Maurizio Rossini
Giovanni Adami
author_facet Angelo Fassio
Davide Gatti
Davide Bertelle
Elena Fracassi
Giulia Zanetti
Ombretta Viapiana
Maurizio Rossini
Giovanni Adami
author_sort Angelo Fassio
collection DOAJ
description Objectives: To investigate whether concomitant autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIIRDs) represent a risk factor for denosumab discontinuation and to explore other possible predictors. Design: This is a real-life retrospective study conducted at our centre on consecutive patients who started treatment with denosumab from January 2014 to October 2021. Methods: Data on patients’ characteristics, denosumab prescriptions and reason for discontinuation were collected from their medical electronic records. A log-rank test was run to assess differences in the denosumab retention rate between the not AIIRD and AIIRD patients. A backward stepwise logistic regression was used to identify possible predictors of denosumab discontinuation. When available, BMD data of the lumbar spine and total hip were collected. Results: Three hundred and sixty-three patients were included (265 not AIIRD and 98 AIIRD; median follow-up, 44 months). Sixty-nine patients discontinued denosumab at any time point (4 due to patient’s decision, 3 due to medical decision, 62 were lost in follow-up). The log-rank test did not find a statistically significant difference for denosumab persistence between the two subgroups. In the binary logistic regression analysis, only older age at initiation and lower baseline serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D were confirmed as predictors for discontinuation. BMD significantly increased from baseline to the last prescription visit at both the lumbar spine and the total hip, without statistically significant differences in the not AIIRD and AIIRD patients. Conclusion: The present data seem to suggest that AIIRDs do not represent a risk factor for denosumab discontinuation. Furthermore, the presence of AIIRDs does not seem to impair its effectiveness in terms of BMD.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T21:02:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-abcd1c1747ac44839003c47d3f29708f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1759-7218
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T21:02:10Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease
spelling doaj.art-abcd1c1747ac44839003c47d3f29708f2022-12-22T04:03:27ZengSAGE PublishingTherapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease1759-72182022-09-011410.1177/1759720X221124543Comparable long-term retention rates and effects on bone mineral density of denosumab treatment in patients with osteoporosis with or without autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases: real-life dataAngelo FassioDavide GattiDavide BertelleElena FracassiGiulia ZanettiOmbretta ViapianaMaurizio RossiniGiovanni AdamiObjectives: To investigate whether concomitant autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIIRDs) represent a risk factor for denosumab discontinuation and to explore other possible predictors. Design: This is a real-life retrospective study conducted at our centre on consecutive patients who started treatment with denosumab from January 2014 to October 2021. Methods: Data on patients’ characteristics, denosumab prescriptions and reason for discontinuation were collected from their medical electronic records. A log-rank test was run to assess differences in the denosumab retention rate between the not AIIRD and AIIRD patients. A backward stepwise logistic regression was used to identify possible predictors of denosumab discontinuation. When available, BMD data of the lumbar spine and total hip were collected. Results: Three hundred and sixty-three patients were included (265 not AIIRD and 98 AIIRD; median follow-up, 44 months). Sixty-nine patients discontinued denosumab at any time point (4 due to patient’s decision, 3 due to medical decision, 62 were lost in follow-up). The log-rank test did not find a statistically significant difference for denosumab persistence between the two subgroups. In the binary logistic regression analysis, only older age at initiation and lower baseline serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D were confirmed as predictors for discontinuation. BMD significantly increased from baseline to the last prescription visit at both the lumbar spine and the total hip, without statistically significant differences in the not AIIRD and AIIRD patients. Conclusion: The present data seem to suggest that AIIRDs do not represent a risk factor for denosumab discontinuation. Furthermore, the presence of AIIRDs does not seem to impair its effectiveness in terms of BMD.https://doi.org/10.1177/1759720X221124543
spellingShingle Angelo Fassio
Davide Gatti
Davide Bertelle
Elena Fracassi
Giulia Zanetti
Ombretta Viapiana
Maurizio Rossini
Giovanni Adami
Comparable long-term retention rates and effects on bone mineral density of denosumab treatment in patients with osteoporosis with or without autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases: real-life data
Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease
title Comparable long-term retention rates and effects on bone mineral density of denosumab treatment in patients with osteoporosis with or without autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases: real-life data
title_full Comparable long-term retention rates and effects on bone mineral density of denosumab treatment in patients with osteoporosis with or without autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases: real-life data
title_fullStr Comparable long-term retention rates and effects on bone mineral density of denosumab treatment in patients with osteoporosis with or without autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases: real-life data
title_full_unstemmed Comparable long-term retention rates and effects on bone mineral density of denosumab treatment in patients with osteoporosis with or without autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases: real-life data
title_short Comparable long-term retention rates and effects on bone mineral density of denosumab treatment in patients with osteoporosis with or without autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases: real-life data
title_sort comparable long term retention rates and effects on bone mineral density of denosumab treatment in patients with osteoporosis with or without autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases real life data
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1759720X221124543
work_keys_str_mv AT angelofassio comparablelongtermretentionratesandeffectsonbonemineraldensityofdenosumabtreatmentinpatientswithosteoporosiswithorwithoutautoimmuneinflammatoryrheumaticdiseasesreallifedata
AT davidegatti comparablelongtermretentionratesandeffectsonbonemineraldensityofdenosumabtreatmentinpatientswithosteoporosiswithorwithoutautoimmuneinflammatoryrheumaticdiseasesreallifedata
AT davidebertelle comparablelongtermretentionratesandeffectsonbonemineraldensityofdenosumabtreatmentinpatientswithosteoporosiswithorwithoutautoimmuneinflammatoryrheumaticdiseasesreallifedata
AT elenafracassi comparablelongtermretentionratesandeffectsonbonemineraldensityofdenosumabtreatmentinpatientswithosteoporosiswithorwithoutautoimmuneinflammatoryrheumaticdiseasesreallifedata
AT giuliazanetti comparablelongtermretentionratesandeffectsonbonemineraldensityofdenosumabtreatmentinpatientswithosteoporosiswithorwithoutautoimmuneinflammatoryrheumaticdiseasesreallifedata
AT ombrettaviapiana comparablelongtermretentionratesandeffectsonbonemineraldensityofdenosumabtreatmentinpatientswithosteoporosiswithorwithoutautoimmuneinflammatoryrheumaticdiseasesreallifedata
AT mauriziorossini comparablelongtermretentionratesandeffectsonbonemineraldensityofdenosumabtreatmentinpatientswithosteoporosiswithorwithoutautoimmuneinflammatoryrheumaticdiseasesreallifedata
AT giovanniadami comparablelongtermretentionratesandeffectsonbonemineraldensityofdenosumabtreatmentinpatientswithosteoporosiswithorwithoutautoimmuneinflammatoryrheumaticdiseasesreallifedata