Analysis and Identification of Non-Impact Factors on Smart City Readiness Using Technology Acceptance Analysis: A Case Study in Kampar District, Indonesia

Most countries start to implement Smart Cities as an innovation for urban strategy. However, not all Smart Cities implementations worked and were implemented well, because the community still not ready for the implementation of Smart City. The aim of this research is to investigate community readin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. Khairul Anam, Arda Yunianta, Hasan J. Alyamani, Erlin Erlin, Ahmad Zamsuri, Muhammad Bambang Firdaus
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Yayasan Pendidikan Riset dan Pengembangan Intelektual (YRPI) 2023-12-01
Series:Journal of Applied Engineering and Technological Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.yrpipku.com/journal/index.php/jaets/article/view/2401
_version_ 1797208944470392832
author M. Khairul Anam
Arda Yunianta
Hasan J. Alyamani
Erlin Erlin
Ahmad Zamsuri
Muhammad Bambang Firdaus
author_facet M. Khairul Anam
Arda Yunianta
Hasan J. Alyamani
Erlin Erlin
Ahmad Zamsuri
Muhammad Bambang Firdaus
author_sort M. Khairul Anam
collection DOAJ
description Most countries start to implement Smart Cities as an innovation for urban strategy. However, not all Smart Cities implementations worked and were implemented well, because the community still not ready for the implementation of Smart City. The aim of this research is to investigate community readiness and finding low impact factors for implementing smart cities based on 5 factors, namely AU, PEOU, ATU, BIU, and PU. This research was using a qualitative study with the Technology Acceptance Model approach (TAM) to investigate the relationship between 5 factors. Based on the results of data distribution, there are 2 clusters, namely people who know about public service applications and people who are not aware of any public service applications. Furthermore, there are 3 tests conducted in this research namely T-test, F-test and Coefficient Determination Test to determine the impact and influence of the relationship between each factor. However, from the results of the t-test it was found that there were 2 relationships that had no impact because the t-count was negative and the 2 relationships between these factors were between PU - AU and AU - PU.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T14:16:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-abce3dc804874471b2c99224107c9fc9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2715-6087
2715-6079
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T09:46:51Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Yayasan Pendidikan Riset dan Pengembangan Intelektual (YRPI)
record_format Article
series Journal of Applied Engineering and Technological Science
spelling doaj.art-abce3dc804874471b2c99224107c9fc92024-04-14T12:08:02ZengYayasan Pendidikan Riset dan Pengembangan Intelektual (YRPI)Journal of Applied Engineering and Technological Science2715-60872715-60792023-12-015110.37385/jaets.v5i1.2401Analysis and Identification of Non-Impact Factors on Smart City Readiness Using Technology Acceptance Analysis: A Case Study in Kampar District, IndonesiaM. Khairul Anam0Arda Yunianta1Hasan J. Alyamani2Erlin Erlin3Ahmad Zamsuri4Muhammad Bambang Firdaus5STMIK Amik RiauKing Abdulaziz UniversityKing Abdulaziz UniversityInstitut Bisnis dan Teknologi Pelita IndonesiaLancang Kuning UniversityMulawarman University Most countries start to implement Smart Cities as an innovation for urban strategy. However, not all Smart Cities implementations worked and were implemented well, because the community still not ready for the implementation of Smart City. The aim of this research is to investigate community readiness and finding low impact factors for implementing smart cities based on 5 factors, namely AU, PEOU, ATU, BIU, and PU. This research was using a qualitative study with the Technology Acceptance Model approach (TAM) to investigate the relationship between 5 factors. Based on the results of data distribution, there are 2 clusters, namely people who know about public service applications and people who are not aware of any public service applications. Furthermore, there are 3 tests conducted in this research namely T-test, F-test and Coefficient Determination Test to determine the impact and influence of the relationship between each factor. However, from the results of the t-test it was found that there were 2 relationships that had no impact because the t-count was negative and the 2 relationships between these factors were between PU - AU and AU - PU. https://www.yrpipku.com/journal/index.php/jaets/article/view/2401Kampar DistrictSmart cityTAM (Technology Acceptance Model)readiness
spellingShingle M. Khairul Anam
Arda Yunianta
Hasan J. Alyamani
Erlin Erlin
Ahmad Zamsuri
Muhammad Bambang Firdaus
Analysis and Identification of Non-Impact Factors on Smart City Readiness Using Technology Acceptance Analysis: A Case Study in Kampar District, Indonesia
Journal of Applied Engineering and Technological Science
Kampar District
Smart city
TAM (Technology Acceptance Model)
readiness
title Analysis and Identification of Non-Impact Factors on Smart City Readiness Using Technology Acceptance Analysis: A Case Study in Kampar District, Indonesia
title_full Analysis and Identification of Non-Impact Factors on Smart City Readiness Using Technology Acceptance Analysis: A Case Study in Kampar District, Indonesia
title_fullStr Analysis and Identification of Non-Impact Factors on Smart City Readiness Using Technology Acceptance Analysis: A Case Study in Kampar District, Indonesia
title_full_unstemmed Analysis and Identification of Non-Impact Factors on Smart City Readiness Using Technology Acceptance Analysis: A Case Study in Kampar District, Indonesia
title_short Analysis and Identification of Non-Impact Factors on Smart City Readiness Using Technology Acceptance Analysis: A Case Study in Kampar District, Indonesia
title_sort analysis and identification of non impact factors on smart city readiness using technology acceptance analysis a case study in kampar district indonesia
topic Kampar District
Smart city
TAM (Technology Acceptance Model)
readiness
url https://www.yrpipku.com/journal/index.php/jaets/article/view/2401
work_keys_str_mv AT mkhairulanam analysisandidentificationofnonimpactfactorsonsmartcityreadinessusingtechnologyacceptanceanalysisacasestudyinkampardistrictindonesia
AT ardayunianta analysisandidentificationofnonimpactfactorsonsmartcityreadinessusingtechnologyacceptanceanalysisacasestudyinkampardistrictindonesia
AT hasanjalyamani analysisandidentificationofnonimpactfactorsonsmartcityreadinessusingtechnologyacceptanceanalysisacasestudyinkampardistrictindonesia
AT erlinerlin analysisandidentificationofnonimpactfactorsonsmartcityreadinessusingtechnologyacceptanceanalysisacasestudyinkampardistrictindonesia
AT ahmadzamsuri analysisandidentificationofnonimpactfactorsonsmartcityreadinessusingtechnologyacceptanceanalysisacasestudyinkampardistrictindonesia
AT muhammadbambangfirdaus analysisandidentificationofnonimpactfactorsonsmartcityreadinessusingtechnologyacceptanceanalysisacasestudyinkampardistrictindonesia