List of words to evaluate speech perception: recording and verification of applicability
ABSTRACT Purpose: to record the “List of Words to Evaluate the Speech Perception of Children with Hearing Loss” which is standardized for live speech presentation and verify its clinical applicability. Methods: recording: acoustic standards were used, three recordings of each word and analysis by...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
CEFAC Saúde e Educação
2020-10-01
|
| Series: | Revista CEFAC |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462020000500501&tlng=pt |
| _version_ | 1798013939511984128 |
|---|---|
| author | Grace Kelly de Souza Seixas Ciscare Julia Speranza Zabeu Djane Rosa dos Santos Marina Morettin-Zupelari Eliane Maria Carrit Delgado-Pinheiro Natália Barreto Frederigue-Lopes |
| author_facet | Grace Kelly de Souza Seixas Ciscare Julia Speranza Zabeu Djane Rosa dos Santos Marina Morettin-Zupelari Eliane Maria Carrit Delgado-Pinheiro Natália Barreto Frederigue-Lopes |
| author_sort | Grace Kelly de Souza Seixas Ciscare |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | ABSTRACT Purpose: to record the “List of Words to Evaluate the Speech Perception of Children with Hearing Loss” which is standardized for live speech presentation and verify its clinical applicability. Methods: recording: acoustic standards were used, three recordings of each word and analysis by judges. The list was recorded in silence at 60 decibels (dB) and signal noise relation of +10 dB. Participants: 30 children in the age range from five years to 10 years and 11 months, with no auditory and language disorders. The procedure was performed in live and recorded speech. Wilcoxon’s, paired t and Spearman’s correlation coefficient tests (p-value significantly less or equal to 0.05), were applied. Results: the comparison of performance for recognition of words and phonemes between live and recorded speech resulted in a statistically significant difference (p ≤ 0.05), in all conditions analyzed. The results were higher in the silence condition. There was no statistically significant difference between the time of application in the recorded speech when compared in silence and noise (p=0.064). Conclusion: the recording and application of the procedure that analyzes recognition of phonemes and words proved to be viable in recorded speech in silence and noise. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-11T15:09:41Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-abe4c1254fb0469eb9fcfeb2c270c9fc |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1982-0216 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-11T15:09:41Z |
| publishDate | 2020-10-01 |
| publisher | CEFAC Saúde e Educação |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Revista CEFAC |
| spelling | doaj.art-abe4c1254fb0469eb9fcfeb2c270c9fc2022-12-22T04:16:41ZengCEFAC Saúde e EducaçãoRevista CEFAC1982-02162020-10-0122510.1590/1982-0216/20202252820List of words to evaluate speech perception: recording and verification of applicabilityGrace Kelly de Souza Seixas Ciscarehttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7005-4835Julia Speranza Zabeuhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4254-9299Djane Rosa dos Santoshttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2797-5188Marina Morettin-Zupelarihttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2577-374XEliane Maria Carrit Delgado-Pinheirohttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7589-2125Natália Barreto Frederigue-Lopeshttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6738-3278ABSTRACT Purpose: to record the “List of Words to Evaluate the Speech Perception of Children with Hearing Loss” which is standardized for live speech presentation and verify its clinical applicability. Methods: recording: acoustic standards were used, three recordings of each word and analysis by judges. The list was recorded in silence at 60 decibels (dB) and signal noise relation of +10 dB. Participants: 30 children in the age range from five years to 10 years and 11 months, with no auditory and language disorders. The procedure was performed in live and recorded speech. Wilcoxon’s, paired t and Spearman’s correlation coefficient tests (p-value significantly less or equal to 0.05), were applied. Results: the comparison of performance for recognition of words and phonemes between live and recorded speech resulted in a statistically significant difference (p ≤ 0.05), in all conditions analyzed. The results were higher in the silence condition. There was no statistically significant difference between the time of application in the recorded speech when compared in silence and noise (p=0.064). Conclusion: the recording and application of the procedure that analyzes recognition of phonemes and words proved to be viable in recorded speech in silence and noise.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462020000500501&tlng=ptHearing LossChildSpeech PerceptionHearing AidsCochlear Implant |
| spellingShingle | Grace Kelly de Souza Seixas Ciscare Julia Speranza Zabeu Djane Rosa dos Santos Marina Morettin-Zupelari Eliane Maria Carrit Delgado-Pinheiro Natália Barreto Frederigue-Lopes List of words to evaluate speech perception: recording and verification of applicability Revista CEFAC Hearing Loss Child Speech Perception Hearing Aids Cochlear Implant |
| title | List of words to evaluate speech perception: recording and verification of applicability |
| title_full | List of words to evaluate speech perception: recording and verification of applicability |
| title_fullStr | List of words to evaluate speech perception: recording and verification of applicability |
| title_full_unstemmed | List of words to evaluate speech perception: recording and verification of applicability |
| title_short | List of words to evaluate speech perception: recording and verification of applicability |
| title_sort | list of words to evaluate speech perception recording and verification of applicability |
| topic | Hearing Loss Child Speech Perception Hearing Aids Cochlear Implant |
| url | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-18462020000500501&tlng=pt |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT gracekellydesouzaseixasciscare listofwordstoevaluatespeechperceptionrecordingandverificationofapplicability AT juliasperanzazabeu listofwordstoevaluatespeechperceptionrecordingandverificationofapplicability AT djanerosadossantos listofwordstoevaluatespeechperceptionrecordingandverificationofapplicability AT marinamorettinzupelari listofwordstoevaluatespeechperceptionrecordingandverificationofapplicability AT elianemariacarritdelgadopinheiro listofwordstoevaluatespeechperceptionrecordingandverificationofapplicability AT nataliabarretofrederiguelopes listofwordstoevaluatespeechperceptionrecordingandverificationofapplicability |