Participants' preference for type of leaflet used to feed back the results of a randomised trial: a survey

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Hundreds of thousands of volunteers take part in medical research, but many will never hear from researchers about what the study revealed. There is a growing demand for the results of randomised trials to be fed back to research par...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Houston Helen, Hood Kerenza, Hendry Maggie, Gillan Maureen, Gilbert Fiona, Garratt Andrew, Fylan Fiona, Cross Ben, Cox Helen, Coulton Simon, Bryan Stirling, Atwell Christine, Dennis Laura, Andronis Lazaros, Brealey Stephen, King David, Morton Veronica, Robling Michael, Russell Ian, Wilkinson Clare
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2010-12-01
Series:Trials
Online Access:http://www.trialsjournal.com/content/11/1/116
_version_ 1811284447705694208
author Houston Helen
Hood Kerenza
Hendry Maggie
Gillan Maureen
Gilbert Fiona
Garratt Andrew
Fylan Fiona
Cross Ben
Cox Helen
Coulton Simon
Bryan Stirling
Atwell Christine
Dennis Laura
Andronis Lazaros
Brealey Stephen
King David
Morton Veronica
Robling Michael
Russell Ian
Wilkinson Clare
author_facet Houston Helen
Hood Kerenza
Hendry Maggie
Gillan Maureen
Gilbert Fiona
Garratt Andrew
Fylan Fiona
Cross Ben
Cox Helen
Coulton Simon
Bryan Stirling
Atwell Christine
Dennis Laura
Andronis Lazaros
Brealey Stephen
King David
Morton Veronica
Robling Michael
Russell Ian
Wilkinson Clare
author_sort Houston Helen
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Hundreds of thousands of volunteers take part in medical research, but many will never hear from researchers about what the study revealed. There is a growing demand for the results of randomised trials to be fed back to research participants both for ethical research practice and for ensuring their co-operation in a trial. This study aims to determine participants' preferences for type of leaflet (short versus long) used to summarise the findings of a randomised trial; and to test whether certain characteristics explained participants' preferences.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>553 participants in a randomised trial about General Practitioners' access to Magnetic Resonance Imaging for patients presenting with suspected internal derangement of the knee were asked in the final follow-up questionnaire whether they would like to be fed back the results of the trial. Participants who agreed to this were included in a postal questionnaire survey asking about their preference, if any, between a short and a long leaflet and what it was about the leaflet that they preferred. Multinomial logistic regression was used to test whether certain demographics of responding participants along with treatment group explained whether a participant had a preference for type of leaflet or no preference.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Of the participants who returned the final follow-up questionnaire, 416 (88%) agreed to receive the results of the trial. Subsequently 132 (32%) participants responded to the survey. Most participants preferred the longer leaflet (55%) and the main reasons for this were the use of technical information (94%) and diagrams (89%). There was weak evidence to suggest that gender might explain whether participants have a preference for type of leaflet or not (P = 0.084).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Trial participants want to receive feed back about the results and appear to prefer a longer leaflet. Males and females might require information to be communicated to them differently and should be the focus of further research.</p> <p>Trial registration</p> <p>The trial is registered with <url>http://www.isrctn.org/</url> and ID is ISRCTN76616358.</p>
first_indexed 2024-04-13T02:28:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-abeb1acb0d5347b7960a6c2ba089f889
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1745-6215
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T02:28:44Z
publishDate 2010-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Trials
spelling doaj.art-abeb1acb0d5347b7960a6c2ba089f8892022-12-22T03:06:41ZengBMCTrials1745-62152010-12-0111111610.1186/1745-6215-11-116Participants' preference for type of leaflet used to feed back the results of a randomised trial: a surveyHouston HelenHood KerenzaHendry MaggieGillan MaureenGilbert FionaGarratt AndrewFylan FionaCross BenCox HelenCoulton SimonBryan StirlingAtwell ChristineDennis LauraAndronis LazarosBrealey StephenKing DavidMorton VeronicaRobling MichaelRussell IanWilkinson Clare<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Hundreds of thousands of volunteers take part in medical research, but many will never hear from researchers about what the study revealed. There is a growing demand for the results of randomised trials to be fed back to research participants both for ethical research practice and for ensuring their co-operation in a trial. This study aims to determine participants' preferences for type of leaflet (short versus long) used to summarise the findings of a randomised trial; and to test whether certain characteristics explained participants' preferences.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>553 participants in a randomised trial about General Practitioners' access to Magnetic Resonance Imaging for patients presenting with suspected internal derangement of the knee were asked in the final follow-up questionnaire whether they would like to be fed back the results of the trial. Participants who agreed to this were included in a postal questionnaire survey asking about their preference, if any, between a short and a long leaflet and what it was about the leaflet that they preferred. Multinomial logistic regression was used to test whether certain demographics of responding participants along with treatment group explained whether a participant had a preference for type of leaflet or no preference.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Of the participants who returned the final follow-up questionnaire, 416 (88%) agreed to receive the results of the trial. Subsequently 132 (32%) participants responded to the survey. Most participants preferred the longer leaflet (55%) and the main reasons for this were the use of technical information (94%) and diagrams (89%). There was weak evidence to suggest that gender might explain whether participants have a preference for type of leaflet or not (P = 0.084).</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Trial participants want to receive feed back about the results and appear to prefer a longer leaflet. Males and females might require information to be communicated to them differently and should be the focus of further research.</p> <p>Trial registration</p> <p>The trial is registered with <url>http://www.isrctn.org/</url> and ID is ISRCTN76616358.</p>http://www.trialsjournal.com/content/11/1/116
spellingShingle Houston Helen
Hood Kerenza
Hendry Maggie
Gillan Maureen
Gilbert Fiona
Garratt Andrew
Fylan Fiona
Cross Ben
Cox Helen
Coulton Simon
Bryan Stirling
Atwell Christine
Dennis Laura
Andronis Lazaros
Brealey Stephen
King David
Morton Veronica
Robling Michael
Russell Ian
Wilkinson Clare
Participants' preference for type of leaflet used to feed back the results of a randomised trial: a survey
Trials
title Participants' preference for type of leaflet used to feed back the results of a randomised trial: a survey
title_full Participants' preference for type of leaflet used to feed back the results of a randomised trial: a survey
title_fullStr Participants' preference for type of leaflet used to feed back the results of a randomised trial: a survey
title_full_unstemmed Participants' preference for type of leaflet used to feed back the results of a randomised trial: a survey
title_short Participants' preference for type of leaflet used to feed back the results of a randomised trial: a survey
title_sort participants preference for type of leaflet used to feed back the results of a randomised trial a survey
url http://www.trialsjournal.com/content/11/1/116
work_keys_str_mv AT houstonhelen participantspreferencefortypeofleafletusedtofeedbacktheresultsofarandomisedtrialasurvey
AT hoodkerenza participantspreferencefortypeofleafletusedtofeedbacktheresultsofarandomisedtrialasurvey
AT hendrymaggie participantspreferencefortypeofleafletusedtofeedbacktheresultsofarandomisedtrialasurvey
AT gillanmaureen participantspreferencefortypeofleafletusedtofeedbacktheresultsofarandomisedtrialasurvey
AT gilbertfiona participantspreferencefortypeofleafletusedtofeedbacktheresultsofarandomisedtrialasurvey
AT garrattandrew participantspreferencefortypeofleafletusedtofeedbacktheresultsofarandomisedtrialasurvey
AT fylanfiona participantspreferencefortypeofleafletusedtofeedbacktheresultsofarandomisedtrialasurvey
AT crossben participantspreferencefortypeofleafletusedtofeedbacktheresultsofarandomisedtrialasurvey
AT coxhelen participantspreferencefortypeofleafletusedtofeedbacktheresultsofarandomisedtrialasurvey
AT coultonsimon participantspreferencefortypeofleafletusedtofeedbacktheresultsofarandomisedtrialasurvey
AT bryanstirling participantspreferencefortypeofleafletusedtofeedbacktheresultsofarandomisedtrialasurvey
AT atwellchristine participantspreferencefortypeofleafletusedtofeedbacktheresultsofarandomisedtrialasurvey
AT dennislaura participantspreferencefortypeofleafletusedtofeedbacktheresultsofarandomisedtrialasurvey
AT andronislazaros participantspreferencefortypeofleafletusedtofeedbacktheresultsofarandomisedtrialasurvey
AT brealeystephen participantspreferencefortypeofleafletusedtofeedbacktheresultsofarandomisedtrialasurvey
AT kingdavid participantspreferencefortypeofleafletusedtofeedbacktheresultsofarandomisedtrialasurvey
AT mortonveronica participantspreferencefortypeofleafletusedtofeedbacktheresultsofarandomisedtrialasurvey
AT roblingmichael participantspreferencefortypeofleafletusedtofeedbacktheresultsofarandomisedtrialasurvey
AT russellian participantspreferencefortypeofleafletusedtofeedbacktheresultsofarandomisedtrialasurvey
AT wilkinsonclare participantspreferencefortypeofleafletusedtofeedbacktheresultsofarandomisedtrialasurvey