Enhancing Multiple Ways of Knowing; Comment on “Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study”

This commentary reviews the Scurr and colleagues’ article published in International Journal of Health Policy and Management in February 2022 on “Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study.” Schur adds to the current knowledge base by extending the stakeholder gr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Katherine M. Boydell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2023-12-01
Series:International Journal of Health Policy and Management
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.ijhpm.com/article_4429_ccadc1ca174f5ca0455adfd8081fdec6.pdf
_version_ 1827281682434097152
author Katherine M. Boydell
author_facet Katherine M. Boydell
author_sort Katherine M. Boydell
collection DOAJ
description This commentary reviews the Scurr and colleagues’ article published in International Journal of Health Policy and Management in February 2022 on “Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study.” Schur adds to the current knowledge base by extending the stakeholder groups in deliberative dialogues (DD) to members of the affected community, a practice not commonly used in such DD strategies. Their study supports the inclusion of public participants in such dialogues, and offers practical guidelines for ways in which to accommodate these important participants. This commentary highlights the need to acknowledge diverse types of knowing into what is considered evidence and advocates for evidence to include a wide-ranging variety of sources including tacit knowledge via experience and ongoing learning.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T09:04:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-abf57c6eba6b48bf9abd43516cae9de0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2322-5939
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T09:04:13Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Kerman University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series International Journal of Health Policy and Management
spelling doaj.art-abf57c6eba6b48bf9abd43516cae9de02024-04-15T19:04:26ZengKerman University of Medical SciencesInternational Journal of Health Policy and Management2322-59392023-12-0112Issue 11210.34172/ijhpm.2023.77764429Enhancing Multiple Ways of Knowing; Comment on “Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study”Katherine M. Boydell0Black Dog Institute, Sydney, NSW, AustraliaThis commentary reviews the Scurr and colleagues’ article published in International Journal of Health Policy and Management in February 2022 on “Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study.” Schur adds to the current knowledge base by extending the stakeholder groups in deliberative dialogues (DD) to members of the affected community, a practice not commonly used in such DD strategies. Their study supports the inclusion of public participants in such dialogues, and offers practical guidelines for ways in which to accommodate these important participants. This commentary highlights the need to acknowledge diverse types of knowing into what is considered evidence and advocates for evidence to include a wide-ranging variety of sources including tacit knowledge via experience and ongoing learning.https://www.ijhpm.com/article_4429_ccadc1ca174f5ca0455adfd8081fdec6.pdfdeliberative dialoguepolicy-makingpublic participationknowledge translation strategy
spellingShingle Katherine M. Boydell
Enhancing Multiple Ways of Knowing; Comment on “Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study”
International Journal of Health Policy and Management
deliberative dialogue
policy-making
public participation
knowledge translation strategy
title Enhancing Multiple Ways of Knowing; Comment on “Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study”
title_full Enhancing Multiple Ways of Knowing; Comment on “Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study”
title_fullStr Enhancing Multiple Ways of Knowing; Comment on “Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study”
title_full_unstemmed Enhancing Multiple Ways of Knowing; Comment on “Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study”
title_short Enhancing Multiple Ways of Knowing; Comment on “Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study”
title_sort enhancing multiple ways of knowing comment on evaluating public participation in a deliberative dialogue a single case study
topic deliberative dialogue
policy-making
public participation
knowledge translation strategy
url https://www.ijhpm.com/article_4429_ccadc1ca174f5ca0455adfd8081fdec6.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT katherinemboydell enhancingmultiplewaysofknowingcommentonevaluatingpublicparticipationinadeliberativedialogueasinglecasestudy