Enhancing Multiple Ways of Knowing; Comment on “Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study”
This commentary reviews the Scurr and colleagues’ article published in International Journal of Health Policy and Management in February 2022 on “Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study.” Schur adds to the current knowledge base by extending the stakeholder gr...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Kerman University of Medical Sciences
2023-12-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Health Policy and Management |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.ijhpm.com/article_4429_ccadc1ca174f5ca0455adfd8081fdec6.pdf |
_version_ | 1827281682434097152 |
---|---|
author | Katherine M. Boydell |
author_facet | Katherine M. Boydell |
author_sort | Katherine M. Boydell |
collection | DOAJ |
description | This commentary reviews the Scurr and colleagues’ article published in International Journal of Health Policy and Management in February 2022 on “Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study.” Schur adds to the current knowledge base by extending the stakeholder groups in deliberative dialogues (DD) to members of the affected community, a practice not commonly used in such DD strategies. Their study supports the inclusion of public participants in such dialogues, and offers practical guidelines for ways in which to accommodate these important participants. This commentary highlights the need to acknowledge diverse types of knowing into what is considered evidence and advocates for evidence to include a wide-ranging variety of sources including tacit knowledge via experience and ongoing learning. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-24T09:04:13Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-abf57c6eba6b48bf9abd43516cae9de0 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2322-5939 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-24T09:04:13Z |
publishDate | 2023-12-01 |
publisher | Kerman University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | Article |
series | International Journal of Health Policy and Management |
spelling | doaj.art-abf57c6eba6b48bf9abd43516cae9de02024-04-15T19:04:26ZengKerman University of Medical SciencesInternational Journal of Health Policy and Management2322-59392023-12-0112Issue 11210.34172/ijhpm.2023.77764429Enhancing Multiple Ways of Knowing; Comment on “Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study”Katherine M. Boydell0Black Dog Institute, Sydney, NSW, AustraliaThis commentary reviews the Scurr and colleagues’ article published in International Journal of Health Policy and Management in February 2022 on “Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study.” Schur adds to the current knowledge base by extending the stakeholder groups in deliberative dialogues (DD) to members of the affected community, a practice not commonly used in such DD strategies. Their study supports the inclusion of public participants in such dialogues, and offers practical guidelines for ways in which to accommodate these important participants. This commentary highlights the need to acknowledge diverse types of knowing into what is considered evidence and advocates for evidence to include a wide-ranging variety of sources including tacit knowledge via experience and ongoing learning.https://www.ijhpm.com/article_4429_ccadc1ca174f5ca0455adfd8081fdec6.pdfdeliberative dialoguepolicy-makingpublic participationknowledge translation strategy |
spellingShingle | Katherine M. Boydell Enhancing Multiple Ways of Knowing; Comment on “Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study” International Journal of Health Policy and Management deliberative dialogue policy-making public participation knowledge translation strategy |
title | Enhancing Multiple Ways of Knowing; Comment on “Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study” |
title_full | Enhancing Multiple Ways of Knowing; Comment on “Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study” |
title_fullStr | Enhancing Multiple Ways of Knowing; Comment on “Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study” |
title_full_unstemmed | Enhancing Multiple Ways of Knowing; Comment on “Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study” |
title_short | Enhancing Multiple Ways of Knowing; Comment on “Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study” |
title_sort | enhancing multiple ways of knowing comment on evaluating public participation in a deliberative dialogue a single case study |
topic | deliberative dialogue policy-making public participation knowledge translation strategy |
url | https://www.ijhpm.com/article_4429_ccadc1ca174f5ca0455adfd8081fdec6.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT katherinemboydell enhancingmultiplewaysofknowingcommentonevaluatingpublicparticipationinadeliberativedialogueasinglecasestudy |