Consumer protection in practice – transnational comparative account of collective redress mechanisms

The question of effective enforcement of consumer rights has been widely discussed for many years in the European Union. The models of consumer protection significantly vary in the individual Member States. Typically, consumers can claim their rights both at an individual and collective level. The s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jagna Mucha
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Rzeszow University of Technology 2019-12-01
Series:Humanities and Social Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hss.prz.edu.pl/hss/article/view/59
_version_ 1818597779611582464
author Jagna Mucha
author_facet Jagna Mucha
author_sort Jagna Mucha
collection DOAJ
description The question of effective enforcement of consumer rights has been widely discussed for many years in the European Union. The models of consumer protection significantly vary in the individual Member States. Typically, consumers can claim their rights both at an individual and collective level. The systems of enforcement of consumer protection are either public, private or mixed, where both types of enforcement function in a parallel way. The goal of the paper is to discuss the issue of various legal mechanisms that function in the Member States, serving the consumers as a means of collective redress. The main analysis focuses on the legal solutions adopted in Belgium (first part of the paper), UK and the Netherlands (second part of the paper). In particular, the author presents the complementary character of the public and private mechanisms used to enforce the consumer rights. The paper utilises dogmatic and analytical methods for the process of interpretation of the normative material and for the analysis of case law. The study uses the comparative perspective to identify solutions emerging from effective practices found in legal systems of the Member States. The paper proposes several legal solutions to adopt in the Polish law. The findings emerging from the analysis show that both competent consumer organisations commencing group proceedings and experienced judges who choose between opt-in and opt-out systems are vital in the process of effective enforcement of consumer rights. The conclusions from the study are useful in mapping out the legislative process and the analysis discussed in the paper may be extended to legal systems of other Member States.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T11:53:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-abf7eeb81ba645b9970a48dff79bca2a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2300-5327
2300-9918
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T11:53:14Z
publishDate 2019-12-01
publisher Rzeszow University of Technology
record_format Article
series Humanities and Social Sciences
spelling doaj.art-abf7eeb81ba645b9970a48dff79bca2a2022-12-21T22:32:38ZengRzeszow University of TechnologyHumanities and Social Sciences2300-53272300-99182019-12-012649310310.7862/rz.2019.hss.4059Consumer protection in practice – transnational comparative account of collective redress mechanismsJagna Mucha0PhD, University of Warsaw, Poland, Academic Visitor at the University of Oxford, UKThe question of effective enforcement of consumer rights has been widely discussed for many years in the European Union. The models of consumer protection significantly vary in the individual Member States. Typically, consumers can claim their rights both at an individual and collective level. The systems of enforcement of consumer protection are either public, private or mixed, where both types of enforcement function in a parallel way. The goal of the paper is to discuss the issue of various legal mechanisms that function in the Member States, serving the consumers as a means of collective redress. The main analysis focuses on the legal solutions adopted in Belgium (first part of the paper), UK and the Netherlands (second part of the paper). In particular, the author presents the complementary character of the public and private mechanisms used to enforce the consumer rights. The paper utilises dogmatic and analytical methods for the process of interpretation of the normative material and for the analysis of case law. The study uses the comparative perspective to identify solutions emerging from effective practices found in legal systems of the Member States. The paper proposes several legal solutions to adopt in the Polish law. The findings emerging from the analysis show that both competent consumer organisations commencing group proceedings and experienced judges who choose between opt-in and opt-out systems are vital in the process of effective enforcement of consumer rights. The conclusions from the study are useful in mapping out the legislative process and the analysis discussed in the paper may be extended to legal systems of other Member States.https://hss.prz.edu.pl/hss/article/view/59consumerprotectionconsumer law enforcementcollective redressprivate enforcement
spellingShingle Jagna Mucha
Consumer protection in practice – transnational comparative account of collective redress mechanisms
Humanities and Social Sciences
consumer
protection
consumer law enforcement
collective redress
private enforcement
title Consumer protection in practice – transnational comparative account of collective redress mechanisms
title_full Consumer protection in practice – transnational comparative account of collective redress mechanisms
title_fullStr Consumer protection in practice – transnational comparative account of collective redress mechanisms
title_full_unstemmed Consumer protection in practice – transnational comparative account of collective redress mechanisms
title_short Consumer protection in practice – transnational comparative account of collective redress mechanisms
title_sort consumer protection in practice transnational comparative account of collective redress mechanisms
topic consumer
protection
consumer law enforcement
collective redress
private enforcement
url https://hss.prz.edu.pl/hss/article/view/59
work_keys_str_mv AT jagnamucha consumerprotectioninpracticetransnationalcomparativeaccountofcollectiveredressmechanisms