The Difference in Performance and Compatibility between Crystalline and Amorphous Fillers in Mixed Matrix Membranes for Gas Separation (MMMs)
An increasing number of high-performing gas separation membranes is reported almost on a daily basis, yet only a few of them have reached commercialisation while the rest are still considered pure research outcomes. This is often attributable to a rapid change in the performance of these separation...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2023-07-01
|
Series: | Polymers |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/15/13/2951 |
_version_ | 1797590949394644992 |
---|---|
author | Mariolino Carta Ariana R. Antonangelo Johannes Carolus Jansen Mariagiulia Longo |
author_facet | Mariolino Carta Ariana R. Antonangelo Johannes Carolus Jansen Mariagiulia Longo |
author_sort | Mariolino Carta |
collection | DOAJ |
description | An increasing number of high-performing gas separation membranes is reported almost on a daily basis, yet only a few of them have reached commercialisation while the rest are still considered pure research outcomes. This is often attributable to a rapid change in the performance of these separation systems over a relatively short time. A common approach to address this issue is the development of mixed matrix membranes (MMMs). These hybrid systems typically utilise either crystalline or amorphous additives, so-called fillers, which are incorporated into polymeric membranes at different loadings, with the aim to improve and stabilise the final gas separation performance. After a general introduction to the most relevant models to describe the transport properties in MMMs, this review intends to investigate and discuss the main advantages and disadvantages derived from the inclusion of fillers of different morphologies. Particular emphasis will be given to the study of the compatibility at the interface between the filler and the matrix created by the two different classes of additives, the inorganic and crystalline fillers vs. their organic and amorphous counterparts. It will conclude with a brief summary of the main findings. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-11T01:30:35Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-ac00e544d45a42f5a0de3f6ff66d9267 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2073-4360 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-11T01:30:35Z |
publishDate | 2023-07-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Polymers |
spelling | doaj.art-ac00e544d45a42f5a0de3f6ff66d92672023-11-18T17:22:31ZengMDPI AGPolymers2073-43602023-07-011513295110.3390/polym15132951The Difference in Performance and Compatibility between Crystalline and Amorphous Fillers in Mixed Matrix Membranes for Gas Separation (MMMs)Mariolino Carta0Ariana R. Antonangelo1Johannes Carolus Jansen2Mariagiulia Longo3Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Swansea University, Grove Building, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, UKDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Swansea University, Grove Building, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, UKInstitute on Membrane Technology, National Research Council of Italy (CNR-ITM), Via P. Bucci 17/C, 87036 Rende, ItalyInstitute on Membrane Technology, National Research Council of Italy (CNR-ITM), Via P. Bucci 17/C, 87036 Rende, ItalyAn increasing number of high-performing gas separation membranes is reported almost on a daily basis, yet only a few of them have reached commercialisation while the rest are still considered pure research outcomes. This is often attributable to a rapid change in the performance of these separation systems over a relatively short time. A common approach to address this issue is the development of mixed matrix membranes (MMMs). These hybrid systems typically utilise either crystalline or amorphous additives, so-called fillers, which are incorporated into polymeric membranes at different loadings, with the aim to improve and stabilise the final gas separation performance. After a general introduction to the most relevant models to describe the transport properties in MMMs, this review intends to investigate and discuss the main advantages and disadvantages derived from the inclusion of fillers of different morphologies. Particular emphasis will be given to the study of the compatibility at the interface between the filler and the matrix created by the two different classes of additives, the inorganic and crystalline fillers vs. their organic and amorphous counterparts. It will conclude with a brief summary of the main findings.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/15/13/2951MOFsPIMsporous polymersamorphous polymersmixed matrix membranesgas separation |
spellingShingle | Mariolino Carta Ariana R. Antonangelo Johannes Carolus Jansen Mariagiulia Longo The Difference in Performance and Compatibility between Crystalline and Amorphous Fillers in Mixed Matrix Membranes for Gas Separation (MMMs) Polymers MOFs PIMs porous polymers amorphous polymers mixed matrix membranes gas separation |
title | The Difference in Performance and Compatibility between Crystalline and Amorphous Fillers in Mixed Matrix Membranes for Gas Separation (MMMs) |
title_full | The Difference in Performance and Compatibility between Crystalline and Amorphous Fillers in Mixed Matrix Membranes for Gas Separation (MMMs) |
title_fullStr | The Difference in Performance and Compatibility between Crystalline and Amorphous Fillers in Mixed Matrix Membranes for Gas Separation (MMMs) |
title_full_unstemmed | The Difference in Performance and Compatibility between Crystalline and Amorphous Fillers in Mixed Matrix Membranes for Gas Separation (MMMs) |
title_short | The Difference in Performance and Compatibility between Crystalline and Amorphous Fillers in Mixed Matrix Membranes for Gas Separation (MMMs) |
title_sort | difference in performance and compatibility between crystalline and amorphous fillers in mixed matrix membranes for gas separation mmms |
topic | MOFs PIMs porous polymers amorphous polymers mixed matrix membranes gas separation |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/15/13/2951 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mariolinocarta thedifferenceinperformanceandcompatibilitybetweencrystallineandamorphousfillersinmixedmatrixmembranesforgasseparationmmms AT arianarantonangelo thedifferenceinperformanceandcompatibilitybetweencrystallineandamorphousfillersinmixedmatrixmembranesforgasseparationmmms AT johannescarolusjansen thedifferenceinperformanceandcompatibilitybetweencrystallineandamorphousfillersinmixedmatrixmembranesforgasseparationmmms AT mariagiulialongo thedifferenceinperformanceandcompatibilitybetweencrystallineandamorphousfillersinmixedmatrixmembranesforgasseparationmmms AT mariolinocarta differenceinperformanceandcompatibilitybetweencrystallineandamorphousfillersinmixedmatrixmembranesforgasseparationmmms AT arianarantonangelo differenceinperformanceandcompatibilitybetweencrystallineandamorphousfillersinmixedmatrixmembranesforgasseparationmmms AT johannescarolusjansen differenceinperformanceandcompatibilitybetweencrystallineandamorphousfillersinmixedmatrixmembranesforgasseparationmmms AT mariagiulialongo differenceinperformanceandcompatibilitybetweencrystallineandamorphousfillersinmixedmatrixmembranesforgasseparationmmms |