The Difference in Performance and Compatibility between Crystalline and Amorphous Fillers in Mixed Matrix Membranes for Gas Separation (MMMs)

An increasing number of high-performing gas separation membranes is reported almost on a daily basis, yet only a few of them have reached commercialisation while the rest are still considered pure research outcomes. This is often attributable to a rapid change in the performance of these separation...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mariolino Carta, Ariana R. Antonangelo, Johannes Carolus Jansen, Mariagiulia Longo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-07-01
Series:Polymers
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/15/13/2951
_version_ 1797590949394644992
author Mariolino Carta
Ariana R. Antonangelo
Johannes Carolus Jansen
Mariagiulia Longo
author_facet Mariolino Carta
Ariana R. Antonangelo
Johannes Carolus Jansen
Mariagiulia Longo
author_sort Mariolino Carta
collection DOAJ
description An increasing number of high-performing gas separation membranes is reported almost on a daily basis, yet only a few of them have reached commercialisation while the rest are still considered pure research outcomes. This is often attributable to a rapid change in the performance of these separation systems over a relatively short time. A common approach to address this issue is the development of mixed matrix membranes (MMMs). These hybrid systems typically utilise either crystalline or amorphous additives, so-called fillers, which are incorporated into polymeric membranes at different loadings, with the aim to improve and stabilise the final gas separation performance. After a general introduction to the most relevant models to describe the transport properties in MMMs, this review intends to investigate and discuss the main advantages and disadvantages derived from the inclusion of fillers of different morphologies. Particular emphasis will be given to the study of the compatibility at the interface between the filler and the matrix created by the two different classes of additives, the inorganic and crystalline fillers vs. their organic and amorphous counterparts. It will conclude with a brief summary of the main findings.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T01:30:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ac00e544d45a42f5a0de3f6ff66d9267
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-4360
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T01:30:35Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Polymers
spelling doaj.art-ac00e544d45a42f5a0de3f6ff66d92672023-11-18T17:22:31ZengMDPI AGPolymers2073-43602023-07-011513295110.3390/polym15132951The Difference in Performance and Compatibility between Crystalline and Amorphous Fillers in Mixed Matrix Membranes for Gas Separation (MMMs)Mariolino Carta0Ariana R. Antonangelo1Johannes Carolus Jansen2Mariagiulia Longo3Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Swansea University, Grove Building, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, UKDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Swansea University, Grove Building, Singleton Park, Swansea SA2 8PP, UKInstitute on Membrane Technology, National Research Council of Italy (CNR-ITM), Via P. Bucci 17/C, 87036 Rende, ItalyInstitute on Membrane Technology, National Research Council of Italy (CNR-ITM), Via P. Bucci 17/C, 87036 Rende, ItalyAn increasing number of high-performing gas separation membranes is reported almost on a daily basis, yet only a few of them have reached commercialisation while the rest are still considered pure research outcomes. This is often attributable to a rapid change in the performance of these separation systems over a relatively short time. A common approach to address this issue is the development of mixed matrix membranes (MMMs). These hybrid systems typically utilise either crystalline or amorphous additives, so-called fillers, which are incorporated into polymeric membranes at different loadings, with the aim to improve and stabilise the final gas separation performance. After a general introduction to the most relevant models to describe the transport properties in MMMs, this review intends to investigate and discuss the main advantages and disadvantages derived from the inclusion of fillers of different morphologies. Particular emphasis will be given to the study of the compatibility at the interface between the filler and the matrix created by the two different classes of additives, the inorganic and crystalline fillers vs. their organic and amorphous counterparts. It will conclude with a brief summary of the main findings.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/15/13/2951MOFsPIMsporous polymersamorphous polymersmixed matrix membranesgas separation
spellingShingle Mariolino Carta
Ariana R. Antonangelo
Johannes Carolus Jansen
Mariagiulia Longo
The Difference in Performance and Compatibility between Crystalline and Amorphous Fillers in Mixed Matrix Membranes for Gas Separation (MMMs)
Polymers
MOFs
PIMs
porous polymers
amorphous polymers
mixed matrix membranes
gas separation
title The Difference in Performance and Compatibility between Crystalline and Amorphous Fillers in Mixed Matrix Membranes for Gas Separation (MMMs)
title_full The Difference in Performance and Compatibility between Crystalline and Amorphous Fillers in Mixed Matrix Membranes for Gas Separation (MMMs)
title_fullStr The Difference in Performance and Compatibility between Crystalline and Amorphous Fillers in Mixed Matrix Membranes for Gas Separation (MMMs)
title_full_unstemmed The Difference in Performance and Compatibility between Crystalline and Amorphous Fillers in Mixed Matrix Membranes for Gas Separation (MMMs)
title_short The Difference in Performance and Compatibility between Crystalline and Amorphous Fillers in Mixed Matrix Membranes for Gas Separation (MMMs)
title_sort difference in performance and compatibility between crystalline and amorphous fillers in mixed matrix membranes for gas separation mmms
topic MOFs
PIMs
porous polymers
amorphous polymers
mixed matrix membranes
gas separation
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4360/15/13/2951
work_keys_str_mv AT mariolinocarta thedifferenceinperformanceandcompatibilitybetweencrystallineandamorphousfillersinmixedmatrixmembranesforgasseparationmmms
AT arianarantonangelo thedifferenceinperformanceandcompatibilitybetweencrystallineandamorphousfillersinmixedmatrixmembranesforgasseparationmmms
AT johannescarolusjansen thedifferenceinperformanceandcompatibilitybetweencrystallineandamorphousfillersinmixedmatrixmembranesforgasseparationmmms
AT mariagiulialongo thedifferenceinperformanceandcompatibilitybetweencrystallineandamorphousfillersinmixedmatrixmembranesforgasseparationmmms
AT mariolinocarta differenceinperformanceandcompatibilitybetweencrystallineandamorphousfillersinmixedmatrixmembranesforgasseparationmmms
AT arianarantonangelo differenceinperformanceandcompatibilitybetweencrystallineandamorphousfillersinmixedmatrixmembranesforgasseparationmmms
AT johannescarolusjansen differenceinperformanceandcompatibilitybetweencrystallineandamorphousfillersinmixedmatrixmembranesforgasseparationmmms
AT mariagiulialongo differenceinperformanceandcompatibilitybetweencrystallineandamorphousfillersinmixedmatrixmembranesforgasseparationmmms