<b>Dynamics of yield and nutritional value for winter forage intercropping</b> - doi: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v34i2.11507
<p class="aresumo">The work was carried out to assess mass production and nutritional content of winter forages using lopsided oat (<em>Avena strigosa</em>) and white oat (<em>Avena sativa</em>) intercropped with ryegrass (<em>Lolium multiflorum</em&g...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá (Eduem)
2012-03-01
|
| Series: | Acta Scientiarum: Animal Sciences |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/11507 |
| _version_ | 1828763005227106304 |
|---|---|
| author | Magnos Fernando Ziech Thomas Newton Martin Ulysses Cecato Renato Marchesan Wagner Paris Gisele Silveira Borges |
| author_facet | Magnos Fernando Ziech Thomas Newton Martin Ulysses Cecato Renato Marchesan Wagner Paris Gisele Silveira Borges |
| author_sort | Magnos Fernando Ziech |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p class="aresumo">The work was carried out to assess mass production and nutritional content of winter forages using lopsided oat (<em>Avena strigosa</em>) and white oat (<em>Avena sativa</em>) intercropped with ryegrass (<em>Lolium multiflorum</em>) and vetch (<em>Vicia sativa </em>L.). The species were intercropped as the following treatments: lopsided oat with ryegrass (LO+RG); white oat with ryegrass (CO+RG); lopsided oat with vetch (LO+V); white oat with vetch (CO+V); lopsided oat, vetch and ryegrass (LO+RG+V); and white oat, ryegrass and vetch (CO+RG+V). The study evaluated total forage mass production of each intercropping and crude protein levels, neutral detergent fiber and <em>in vitro</em> digestibility coefficient of dry matter. The results indicate that forage yield of oats was higher in early assessments, and ryegrass and vetch were higher in the final evaluation period. The crude protein levels and neutral detergent fiber were higher at the start of the experiment for all evaluated treatments, and those including vetch intercropped with oats showed an increase in these parameters in the final period due to the presence of vetch, which has a more delayed cycle.</p><p class="apalavrachave"> </p> |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-11T01:53:53Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-ac01c7956e814688b487c16b28709ef5 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1806-2636 1807-8672 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-11T01:53:53Z |
| publishDate | 2012-03-01 |
| publisher | Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá (Eduem) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Acta Scientiarum: Animal Sciences |
| spelling | doaj.art-ac01c7956e814688b487c16b28709ef52022-12-22T01:24:41ZengEditora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá (Eduem)Acta Scientiarum: Animal Sciences1806-26361807-86722012-03-01342109115<b>Dynamics of yield and nutritional value for winter forage intercropping</b> - doi: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v34i2.11507Magnos Fernando ZiechThomas Newton MartinUlysses CecatoRenato MarchesanWagner ParisGisele Silveira Borges<p class="aresumo">The work was carried out to assess mass production and nutritional content of winter forages using lopsided oat (<em>Avena strigosa</em>) and white oat (<em>Avena sativa</em>) intercropped with ryegrass (<em>Lolium multiflorum</em>) and vetch (<em>Vicia sativa </em>L.). The species were intercropped as the following treatments: lopsided oat with ryegrass (LO+RG); white oat with ryegrass (CO+RG); lopsided oat with vetch (LO+V); white oat with vetch (CO+V); lopsided oat, vetch and ryegrass (LO+RG+V); and white oat, ryegrass and vetch (CO+RG+V). The study evaluated total forage mass production of each intercropping and crude protein levels, neutral detergent fiber and <em>in vitro</em> digestibility coefficient of dry matter. The results indicate that forage yield of oats was higher in early assessments, and ryegrass and vetch were higher in the final evaluation period. The crude protein levels and neutral detergent fiber were higher at the start of the experiment for all evaluated treatments, and those including vetch intercropped with oats showed an increase in these parameters in the final period due to the presence of vetch, which has a more delayed cycle.</p><p class="apalavrachave"> </p>http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/11507intercroppinggrasseslegumespasture quality |
| spellingShingle | Magnos Fernando Ziech Thomas Newton Martin Ulysses Cecato Renato Marchesan Wagner Paris Gisele Silveira Borges <b>Dynamics of yield and nutritional value for winter forage intercropping</b> - doi: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v34i2.11507 Acta Scientiarum: Animal Sciences intercropping grasses legumes pasture quality |
| title | <b>Dynamics of yield and nutritional value for winter forage intercropping</b> - doi: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v34i2.11507 |
| title_full | <b>Dynamics of yield and nutritional value for winter forage intercropping</b> - doi: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v34i2.11507 |
| title_fullStr | <b>Dynamics of yield and nutritional value for winter forage intercropping</b> - doi: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v34i2.11507 |
| title_full_unstemmed | <b>Dynamics of yield and nutritional value for winter forage intercropping</b> - doi: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v34i2.11507 |
| title_short | <b>Dynamics of yield and nutritional value for winter forage intercropping</b> - doi: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v34i2.11507 |
| title_sort | b dynamics of yield and nutritional value for winter forage intercropping b doi 10 4025 actascianimsci v34i2 11507 |
| topic | intercropping grasses legumes pasture quality |
| url | http://www.periodicos.uem.br/ojs/index.php/ActaSciAnimSci/article/view/11507 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT magnosfernandoziech bdynamicsofyieldandnutritionalvalueforwinterforageintercroppingbdoi104025actascianimsciv34i211507 AT thomasnewtonmartin bdynamicsofyieldandnutritionalvalueforwinterforageintercroppingbdoi104025actascianimsciv34i211507 AT ulyssescecato bdynamicsofyieldandnutritionalvalueforwinterforageintercroppingbdoi104025actascianimsciv34i211507 AT renatomarchesan bdynamicsofyieldandnutritionalvalueforwinterforageintercroppingbdoi104025actascianimsciv34i211507 AT wagnerparis bdynamicsofyieldandnutritionalvalueforwinterforageintercroppingbdoi104025actascianimsciv34i211507 AT giselesilveiraborges bdynamicsofyieldandnutritionalvalueforwinterforageintercroppingbdoi104025actascianimsciv34i211507 |