Is t(11;14)(q13;q32) good or bad for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma?
Main Authors: | Yang Liu, Lu Gao, Yueyun Lai, Lei Wen, Wenbing Duan, Fengrong Wang, Ling Ma, Xiaojun Huang, Jin Lu, Peng Lyu, Yuanyuan Ji |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer
2023-01-01
|
Series: | Chinese Medical Journal |
Online Access: | http://journals.lww.com/10.1097/CM9.0000000000002159 |
Similar Items
-
Translocation t(11;14) (q13;q32) and genomic imbalances in multi-ethnic multiple myeloma patients: a Malaysian study
by: Ivyna Bong Pau Ni, et al.
Published: (2012-09-01) -
CD20 expression: A risk stratification factor for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma with t(11;14)
by: Yuan Jian, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01) -
Plasma cell leukemia with t(11;14)(q13;q32) simulating lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma – a diagnostic challenge solved by flow cytometry
by: Aleyde Diniz Loureiro, et al. -
IgE Plasma Cell Leukemia Harboring t(11;14) and 1q Amplification
by: Wataru Nakahara, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01) -
The Role of t(11;14) in Tailoring Treatment Decisions in Multiple Myeloma
by: Martina Kleber, et al.
Published: (2023-12-01)