Ensuring Quality and Status: Peer Review Practices in Kriterium, A Portal for Quality-Marked Monographs and Edited Volumes in Swedish SSH
Although established forms of peer review are often criticized for being slow, secretive, and even unfair, they are repeatedly mentioned by academics as the most important indicator of quality in scholarly publishing. In many countries, the peer review of books is a less codified practice than that...
Main Authors: | Björn Hammarfelt, Isak Hammar, Helena Francke |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021-10-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frma.2021.740297/full |
Similar Items
-
A MONOGRAPH OF CARYODAPHNOPSIS A. SHAW
by: a. j. g. h. kostermans
Published: (1974-12-01) -
On the occasion of the monograph publication: "50 years of quality at the Faculty of Organizational Sciences, University of Belgrade"
by: Živković Nedeljko D.
Published: (2023-01-01) -
Monograph review: CREATIVE INDRUSTRY OF SELECTED HANDICRAFTS IN EASTERN SLOVAKIA
by: Eva Hvizdová, Beata Blogová
Published: (2018-11-01) -
Enabling A Conversation Across Scholarly Monographs through Open Annotation
by: Andrea C. Bertino, et al.
Published: (2019-06-01) -
Review of the Monograph “Intelligent Transport Systems” by Aldona Jarašūnienė
by: N. K. Paliulis
Published: (2009-03-01)