Comparative Efficacy of Levetiracetam for Epilepsy in School-Aged Children with Intellectual Disability and Normal Intelligence

Choosing optimal anti-seizure medication (ASM) is very important in pediatric patients with epilepsy who attend school, especially children with an intellectual disability (ID). Levetiracetam (LEV) has proven to be an effective, safe, generally well-tolerated, broad-spectrum ASM in children. In the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ja Un Moon, Ji Yoon Han
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-10-01
Series:Brain Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/11/11/1452
_version_ 1827677111482056704
author Ja Un Moon
Ji Yoon Han
author_facet Ja Un Moon
Ji Yoon Han
author_sort Ja Un Moon
collection DOAJ
description Choosing optimal anti-seizure medication (ASM) is very important in pediatric patients with epilepsy who attend school, especially children with an intellectual disability (ID). Levetiracetam (LEV) has proven to be an effective, safe, generally well-tolerated, broad-spectrum ASM in children. In the context of increasing use of LEV in school-aged children with epilepsy and ID, we evaluate relevant clinical data, including efficacy, safety, and tolerability in children with epilepsy and an intellectual disability (ID) or normal intelligence (NI). We performed a retrospective chart review of children and included 298 pediatric patients with epilepsy who were treated with LEV with NI (147) and ID (151). After 6 months, 96% of NI and 83% of ID subjects had a seizure reduction rate greater than 50% (<i>p =</i> 0.031). The tolerability of LEV was generally good, with 75% retention rates at 2 years in both groups and only minor side effects (under 15%). The retention rates of patients with NI and ID were 76% and 74%, respectively (<i>p =</i> 0.597). Thus, LEV showed considerable efficacy with minimal side effects and high retention rates and is an easily maintained and safe treatment option for pediatric epilepsy with ID. However, better-designed research studies are needed to clearly elucidate the efficacy and safety of LEV in children with epilepsy and ID.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T05:39:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ac13ae2b7de64dbb9dca02988a2316ca
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-3425
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T05:39:34Z
publishDate 2021-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Brain Sciences
spelling doaj.art-ac13ae2b7de64dbb9dca02988a2316ca2023-11-22T22:37:53ZengMDPI AGBrain Sciences2076-34252021-10-011111145210.3390/brainsci11111452Comparative Efficacy of Levetiracetam for Epilepsy in School-Aged Children with Intellectual Disability and Normal IntelligenceJa Un Moon0Ji Yoon Han1Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, KoreaDepartment of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, KoreaChoosing optimal anti-seizure medication (ASM) is very important in pediatric patients with epilepsy who attend school, especially children with an intellectual disability (ID). Levetiracetam (LEV) has proven to be an effective, safe, generally well-tolerated, broad-spectrum ASM in children. In the context of increasing use of LEV in school-aged children with epilepsy and ID, we evaluate relevant clinical data, including efficacy, safety, and tolerability in children with epilepsy and an intellectual disability (ID) or normal intelligence (NI). We performed a retrospective chart review of children and included 298 pediatric patients with epilepsy who were treated with LEV with NI (147) and ID (151). After 6 months, 96% of NI and 83% of ID subjects had a seizure reduction rate greater than 50% (<i>p =</i> 0.031). The tolerability of LEV was generally good, with 75% retention rates at 2 years in both groups and only minor side effects (under 15%). The retention rates of patients with NI and ID were 76% and 74%, respectively (<i>p =</i> 0.597). Thus, LEV showed considerable efficacy with minimal side effects and high retention rates and is an easily maintained and safe treatment option for pediatric epilepsy with ID. However, better-designed research studies are needed to clearly elucidate the efficacy and safety of LEV in children with epilepsy and ID.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/11/11/1452levetiracetamanti-seizure medicationsintellectual disabilityepilepsychildrenefficacy
spellingShingle Ja Un Moon
Ji Yoon Han
Comparative Efficacy of Levetiracetam for Epilepsy in School-Aged Children with Intellectual Disability and Normal Intelligence
Brain Sciences
levetiracetam
anti-seizure medications
intellectual disability
epilepsy
children
efficacy
title Comparative Efficacy of Levetiracetam for Epilepsy in School-Aged Children with Intellectual Disability and Normal Intelligence
title_full Comparative Efficacy of Levetiracetam for Epilepsy in School-Aged Children with Intellectual Disability and Normal Intelligence
title_fullStr Comparative Efficacy of Levetiracetam for Epilepsy in School-Aged Children with Intellectual Disability and Normal Intelligence
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Efficacy of Levetiracetam for Epilepsy in School-Aged Children with Intellectual Disability and Normal Intelligence
title_short Comparative Efficacy of Levetiracetam for Epilepsy in School-Aged Children with Intellectual Disability and Normal Intelligence
title_sort comparative efficacy of levetiracetam for epilepsy in school aged children with intellectual disability and normal intelligence
topic levetiracetam
anti-seizure medications
intellectual disability
epilepsy
children
efficacy
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/11/11/1452
work_keys_str_mv AT jaunmoon comparativeefficacyoflevetiracetamforepilepsyinschoolagedchildrenwithintellectualdisabilityandnormalintelligence
AT jiyoonhan comparativeefficacyoflevetiracetamforepilepsyinschoolagedchildrenwithintellectualdisabilityandnormalintelligence