Use of brain MRI atlases to determine boundaries of age-related pathology: the importance of statistical method.

<h4>Introduction</h4>Neurodegenerative disease diagnoses may be supported by the comparison of an individual patient's brain magnetic resonance image (MRI) with a voxel-based atlas of normal brain MRI. Most current brain MRI atlases are of young to middle-aged adults and parametric,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: David Alexander Dickie, Dominic E Job, David Rodriguez Gonzalez, Susan D Shenkin, Joanna M Wardlaw
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127939
_version_ 1819280419719217152
author David Alexander Dickie
Dominic E Job
David Rodriguez Gonzalez
Susan D Shenkin
Joanna M Wardlaw
author_facet David Alexander Dickie
Dominic E Job
David Rodriguez Gonzalez
Susan D Shenkin
Joanna M Wardlaw
author_sort David Alexander Dickie
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Introduction</h4>Neurodegenerative disease diagnoses may be supported by the comparison of an individual patient's brain magnetic resonance image (MRI) with a voxel-based atlas of normal brain MRI. Most current brain MRI atlases are of young to middle-aged adults and parametric, e.g., mean ± standard deviation (SD); these atlases require data to be Gaussian. Brain MRI data, e.g., grey matter (GM) proportion images, from normal older subjects are apparently not Gaussian. We created a nonparametric and a parametric atlas of the normal limits of GM proportions in older subjects and compared their classifications of GM proportions in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients.<h4>Methods</h4>Using publicly available brain MRI from 138 normal subjects and 138 subjects diagnosed with AD (all 55-90 years), we created: a mean ± SD atlas to estimate parametrically the percentile ranks and limits of normal ageing GM; and, separately, a nonparametric, rank order-based GM atlas from the same normal ageing subjects. GM images from AD patients were then classified with respect to each atlas to determine the effect statistical distributions had on classifications of proportions of GM in AD patients.<h4>Results</h4>The parametric atlas often defined the lower normal limit of the proportion of GM to be negative (which does not make sense physiologically as the lowest possible proportion is zero). Because of this, for approximately half of the AD subjects, 25-45% of voxels were classified as normal when compared to the parametric atlas; but were classified as abnormal when compared to the nonparametric atlas. These voxels were mainly concentrated in the frontal and occipital lobes.<h4>Discussion</h4>To our knowledge, we have presented the first nonparametric brain MRI atlas. In conditions where there is increasing variability in brain structure, such as in old age, nonparametric brain MRI atlases may represent the limits of normal brain structure more accurately than parametric approaches. Therefore, we conclude that the statistical method used for construction of brain MRI atlases should be selected taking into account the population and aim under study. Parametric methods are generally robust for defining central tendencies, e.g., means, of brain structure. Nonparametric methods are advisable when studying the limits of brain structure in ageing and neurodegenerative disease.
first_indexed 2024-12-24T00:43:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ac1a0074027547cf9cec965f264fd66a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-24T00:43:30Z
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-ac1a0074027547cf9cec965f264fd66a2022-12-21T17:23:53ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01105e012793910.1371/journal.pone.0127939Use of brain MRI atlases to determine boundaries of age-related pathology: the importance of statistical method.David Alexander DickieDominic E JobDavid Rodriguez GonzalezSusan D ShenkinJoanna M Wardlaw<h4>Introduction</h4>Neurodegenerative disease diagnoses may be supported by the comparison of an individual patient's brain magnetic resonance image (MRI) with a voxel-based atlas of normal brain MRI. Most current brain MRI atlases are of young to middle-aged adults and parametric, e.g., mean ± standard deviation (SD); these atlases require data to be Gaussian. Brain MRI data, e.g., grey matter (GM) proportion images, from normal older subjects are apparently not Gaussian. We created a nonparametric and a parametric atlas of the normal limits of GM proportions in older subjects and compared their classifications of GM proportions in Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients.<h4>Methods</h4>Using publicly available brain MRI from 138 normal subjects and 138 subjects diagnosed with AD (all 55-90 years), we created: a mean ± SD atlas to estimate parametrically the percentile ranks and limits of normal ageing GM; and, separately, a nonparametric, rank order-based GM atlas from the same normal ageing subjects. GM images from AD patients were then classified with respect to each atlas to determine the effect statistical distributions had on classifications of proportions of GM in AD patients.<h4>Results</h4>The parametric atlas often defined the lower normal limit of the proportion of GM to be negative (which does not make sense physiologically as the lowest possible proportion is zero). Because of this, for approximately half of the AD subjects, 25-45% of voxels were classified as normal when compared to the parametric atlas; but were classified as abnormal when compared to the nonparametric atlas. These voxels were mainly concentrated in the frontal and occipital lobes.<h4>Discussion</h4>To our knowledge, we have presented the first nonparametric brain MRI atlas. In conditions where there is increasing variability in brain structure, such as in old age, nonparametric brain MRI atlases may represent the limits of normal brain structure more accurately than parametric approaches. Therefore, we conclude that the statistical method used for construction of brain MRI atlases should be selected taking into account the population and aim under study. Parametric methods are generally robust for defining central tendencies, e.g., means, of brain structure. Nonparametric methods are advisable when studying the limits of brain structure in ageing and neurodegenerative disease.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127939
spellingShingle David Alexander Dickie
Dominic E Job
David Rodriguez Gonzalez
Susan D Shenkin
Joanna M Wardlaw
Use of brain MRI atlases to determine boundaries of age-related pathology: the importance of statistical method.
PLoS ONE
title Use of brain MRI atlases to determine boundaries of age-related pathology: the importance of statistical method.
title_full Use of brain MRI atlases to determine boundaries of age-related pathology: the importance of statistical method.
title_fullStr Use of brain MRI atlases to determine boundaries of age-related pathology: the importance of statistical method.
title_full_unstemmed Use of brain MRI atlases to determine boundaries of age-related pathology: the importance of statistical method.
title_short Use of brain MRI atlases to determine boundaries of age-related pathology: the importance of statistical method.
title_sort use of brain mri atlases to determine boundaries of age related pathology the importance of statistical method
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127939
work_keys_str_mv AT davidalexanderdickie useofbrainmriatlasestodetermineboundariesofagerelatedpathologytheimportanceofstatisticalmethod
AT dominicejob useofbrainmriatlasestodetermineboundariesofagerelatedpathologytheimportanceofstatisticalmethod
AT davidrodriguezgonzalez useofbrainmriatlasestodetermineboundariesofagerelatedpathologytheimportanceofstatisticalmethod
AT susandshenkin useofbrainmriatlasestodetermineboundariesofagerelatedpathologytheimportanceofstatisticalmethod
AT joannamwardlaw useofbrainmriatlasestodetermineboundariesofagerelatedpathologytheimportanceofstatisticalmethod