No relationship between researcher impact and replication effect: an analysis of five studies with 100 replications
What explanation is there when teams of researchers are unable to successfully replicate already established ‘canonical’ findings? One suggestion that has been put forward, but left largely untested, is that those researchers who fail to replicate prior studies are of low ‘expertise and diligence’ a...
Main Authors: | John Protzko, Jonathan W. Schooler |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
PeerJ Inc.
2020-03-01
|
Series: | PeerJ |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://peerj.com/articles/8014.pdf |
Similar Items
-
The challenges of replication
Published: (2017-01-01) -
Making sense of replications
by: Brian A Nosek, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01) -
Replication Study: A coding-independent function of gene and pseudogene mRNAs regulates tumour biology
by: John Kerwin, et al.
Published: (2020-04-01) -
Replication Study: Intestinal inflammation targets cancer-inducing activity of the microbiota
by: Kathryn Eaton, et al.
Published: (2018-10-01) -
Replication Study: Melanoma genome sequencing reveals frequent PREX2 mutations
by: Stephen K Horrigan, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01)