Influence of different surface treatments of fiberglass posts on the bond strength to dentin

Aim: To assess the influence of different fiberglass post surface treatments on the bond strength (BS) to root dentin. Methods: Thirty bovine root canals were endodontically treated and filled with gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer. At 24 h after the endodontic filling, the post spaces were prepared w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bruna Cristina do Nascimento Rechia, Ruth Peggy Bravo, Naylin Danyele de Oliveira, Flares Baratto Filho, Carla Castiglia Gonzaga, Carmen Lucia Mueller Storrer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Estadual de Campinas 2017-04-01
Series:Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8648768
_version_ 1818985697861697536
author Bruna Cristina do Nascimento Rechia
Ruth Peggy Bravo
Naylin Danyele de Oliveira
Flares Baratto Filho
Carla Castiglia Gonzaga
Carmen Lucia Mueller Storrer
author_facet Bruna Cristina do Nascimento Rechia
Ruth Peggy Bravo
Naylin Danyele de Oliveira
Flares Baratto Filho
Carla Castiglia Gonzaga
Carmen Lucia Mueller Storrer
author_sort Bruna Cristina do Nascimento Rechia
collection DOAJ
description Aim: To assess the influence of different fiberglass post surface treatments on the bond strength (BS) to root dentin. Methods: Thirty bovine root canals were endodontically treated and filled with gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer. At 24 h after the endodontic filling, the post spaces were prepared with Gates-Glidden drills and #3 drills of the DC White Post system, maintaining a 4 mm apical seal. The roots were randomly divided into three groups: S (fiberglass posts treated with silane), SA (fiberglass posts treated with silane and a hydrophobic adhesive system) and SHA (fiberglass posts treated with silane, followed by drying with hot air). The posts were cemented with a selfadhesive cement (RelyX U200). The specimens were stored in distilled water at 37 °C for 24 h and subjected to the push-out test (0.5 mm/min). Data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=0.05) Results: SA and SHA groups showed the highest BS mean values (11.29 and 10.85 MPa, respectively), while the S group presented the lowest BS mean value (7.21 MPa). S group was significantly different from SA and SAH groups. Conclusions: The surface treatment of fiberglass posts influenced BS values.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T18:39:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ac1ee4fcf8574a819eae2c5ce1042d72
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1677-3225
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T18:39:01Z
publishDate 2017-04-01
publisher Universidade Estadual de Campinas
record_format Article
series Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
spelling doaj.art-ac1ee4fcf8574a819eae2c5ce1042d722022-12-21T19:29:51ZengUniversidade Estadual de CampinasBrazilian Journal of Oral Sciences1677-32252017-04-0115210.20396/bjos.v15i2.8648768Influence of different surface treatments of fiberglass posts on the bond strength to dentinBruna Cristina do Nascimento Rechia0Ruth Peggy Bravo1Naylin Danyele de Oliveira2Flares Baratto Filho3Carla Castiglia Gonzaga4Carmen Lucia Mueller Storrer5Universidade PositivoUniversidade PositivoUniversidade PositivoUniversidade PositivoUniversidade PositivoUniversidade PositivoAim: To assess the influence of different fiberglass post surface treatments on the bond strength (BS) to root dentin. Methods: Thirty bovine root canals were endodontically treated and filled with gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer. At 24 h after the endodontic filling, the post spaces were prepared with Gates-Glidden drills and #3 drills of the DC White Post system, maintaining a 4 mm apical seal. The roots were randomly divided into three groups: S (fiberglass posts treated with silane), SA (fiberglass posts treated with silane and a hydrophobic adhesive system) and SHA (fiberglass posts treated with silane, followed by drying with hot air). The posts were cemented with a selfadhesive cement (RelyX U200). The specimens were stored in distilled water at 37 °C for 24 h and subjected to the push-out test (0.5 mm/min). Data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=0.05) Results: SA and SHA groups showed the highest BS mean values (11.29 and 10.85 MPa, respectively), while the S group presented the lowest BS mean value (7.21 MPa). S group was significantly different from SA and SAH groups. Conclusions: The surface treatment of fiberglass posts influenced BS values.https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8648768Dentin-bonding agents. Dentin. Denture retention.
spellingShingle Bruna Cristina do Nascimento Rechia
Ruth Peggy Bravo
Naylin Danyele de Oliveira
Flares Baratto Filho
Carla Castiglia Gonzaga
Carmen Lucia Mueller Storrer
Influence of different surface treatments of fiberglass posts on the bond strength to dentin
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
Dentin-bonding agents. Dentin. Denture retention.
title Influence of different surface treatments of fiberglass posts on the bond strength to dentin
title_full Influence of different surface treatments of fiberglass posts on the bond strength to dentin
title_fullStr Influence of different surface treatments of fiberglass posts on the bond strength to dentin
title_full_unstemmed Influence of different surface treatments of fiberglass posts on the bond strength to dentin
title_short Influence of different surface treatments of fiberglass posts on the bond strength to dentin
title_sort influence of different surface treatments of fiberglass posts on the bond strength to dentin
topic Dentin-bonding agents. Dentin. Denture retention.
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8648768
work_keys_str_mv AT brunacristinadonascimentorechia influenceofdifferentsurfacetreatmentsoffiberglasspostsonthebondstrengthtodentin
AT ruthpeggybravo influenceofdifferentsurfacetreatmentsoffiberglasspostsonthebondstrengthtodentin
AT naylindanyeledeoliveira influenceofdifferentsurfacetreatmentsoffiberglasspostsonthebondstrengthtodentin
AT flaresbarattofilho influenceofdifferentsurfacetreatmentsoffiberglasspostsonthebondstrengthtodentin
AT carlacastigliagonzaga influenceofdifferentsurfacetreatmentsoffiberglasspostsonthebondstrengthtodentin
AT carmenluciamuellerstorrer influenceofdifferentsurfacetreatmentsoffiberglasspostsonthebondstrengthtodentin