Influence of different surface treatments of fiberglass posts on the bond strength to dentin
Aim: To assess the influence of different fiberglass post surface treatments on the bond strength (BS) to root dentin. Methods: Thirty bovine root canals were endodontically treated and filled with gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer. At 24 h after the endodontic filling, the post spaces were prepared w...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas
2017-04-01
|
Series: | Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8648768 |
_version_ | 1818985697861697536 |
---|---|
author | Bruna Cristina do Nascimento Rechia Ruth Peggy Bravo Naylin Danyele de Oliveira Flares Baratto Filho Carla Castiglia Gonzaga Carmen Lucia Mueller Storrer |
author_facet | Bruna Cristina do Nascimento Rechia Ruth Peggy Bravo Naylin Danyele de Oliveira Flares Baratto Filho Carla Castiglia Gonzaga Carmen Lucia Mueller Storrer |
author_sort | Bruna Cristina do Nascimento Rechia |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Aim: To assess the influence of different fiberglass post surface treatments on the bond strength (BS) to root dentin. Methods: Thirty bovine root canals were endodontically treated and filled with gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer. At 24 h after the endodontic filling, the post spaces were prepared with Gates-Glidden drills and #3 drills of the DC White Post system, maintaining a 4 mm apical seal. The roots were randomly divided into three groups: S (fiberglass posts treated with silane), SA (fiberglass posts treated with silane and a hydrophobic adhesive system) and SHA (fiberglass posts treated with silane, followed by drying with hot air). The posts were cemented with a selfadhesive cement (RelyX U200). The specimens were stored in distilled water at 37 °C for 24 h and subjected to the push-out test (0.5 mm/min). Data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=0.05) Results: SA and SHA groups showed the highest BS mean values (11.29 and 10.85 MPa, respectively), while the S group presented the lowest BS mean value (7.21 MPa). S group was significantly different from SA and SAH groups. Conclusions: The surface treatment of fiberglass posts influenced BS values. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-20T18:39:01Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-ac1ee4fcf8574a819eae2c5ce1042d72 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1677-3225 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-20T18:39:01Z |
publishDate | 2017-04-01 |
publisher | Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
record_format | Article |
series | Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences |
spelling | doaj.art-ac1ee4fcf8574a819eae2c5ce1042d722022-12-21T19:29:51ZengUniversidade Estadual de CampinasBrazilian Journal of Oral Sciences1677-32252017-04-0115210.20396/bjos.v15i2.8648768Influence of different surface treatments of fiberglass posts on the bond strength to dentinBruna Cristina do Nascimento Rechia0Ruth Peggy Bravo1Naylin Danyele de Oliveira2Flares Baratto Filho3Carla Castiglia Gonzaga4Carmen Lucia Mueller Storrer5Universidade PositivoUniversidade PositivoUniversidade PositivoUniversidade PositivoUniversidade PositivoUniversidade PositivoAim: To assess the influence of different fiberglass post surface treatments on the bond strength (BS) to root dentin. Methods: Thirty bovine root canals were endodontically treated and filled with gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer. At 24 h after the endodontic filling, the post spaces were prepared with Gates-Glidden drills and #3 drills of the DC White Post system, maintaining a 4 mm apical seal. The roots were randomly divided into three groups: S (fiberglass posts treated with silane), SA (fiberglass posts treated with silane and a hydrophobic adhesive system) and SHA (fiberglass posts treated with silane, followed by drying with hot air). The posts were cemented with a selfadhesive cement (RelyX U200). The specimens were stored in distilled water at 37 °C for 24 h and subjected to the push-out test (0.5 mm/min). Data were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=0.05) Results: SA and SHA groups showed the highest BS mean values (11.29 and 10.85 MPa, respectively), while the S group presented the lowest BS mean value (7.21 MPa). S group was significantly different from SA and SAH groups. Conclusions: The surface treatment of fiberglass posts influenced BS values.https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8648768Dentin-bonding agents. Dentin. Denture retention. |
spellingShingle | Bruna Cristina do Nascimento Rechia Ruth Peggy Bravo Naylin Danyele de Oliveira Flares Baratto Filho Carla Castiglia Gonzaga Carmen Lucia Mueller Storrer Influence of different surface treatments of fiberglass posts on the bond strength to dentin Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences Dentin-bonding agents. Dentin. Denture retention. |
title | Influence of different surface treatments of fiberglass posts on the bond strength to dentin |
title_full | Influence of different surface treatments of fiberglass posts on the bond strength to dentin |
title_fullStr | Influence of different surface treatments of fiberglass posts on the bond strength to dentin |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of different surface treatments of fiberglass posts on the bond strength to dentin |
title_short | Influence of different surface treatments of fiberglass posts on the bond strength to dentin |
title_sort | influence of different surface treatments of fiberglass posts on the bond strength to dentin |
topic | Dentin-bonding agents. Dentin. Denture retention. |
url | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8648768 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brunacristinadonascimentorechia influenceofdifferentsurfacetreatmentsoffiberglasspostsonthebondstrengthtodentin AT ruthpeggybravo influenceofdifferentsurfacetreatmentsoffiberglasspostsonthebondstrengthtodentin AT naylindanyeledeoliveira influenceofdifferentsurfacetreatmentsoffiberglasspostsonthebondstrengthtodentin AT flaresbarattofilho influenceofdifferentsurfacetreatmentsoffiberglasspostsonthebondstrengthtodentin AT carlacastigliagonzaga influenceofdifferentsurfacetreatmentsoffiberglasspostsonthebondstrengthtodentin AT carmenluciamuellerstorrer influenceofdifferentsurfacetreatmentsoffiberglasspostsonthebondstrengthtodentin |