„Kłopoty z opisem rzeczy”, czyli (nie)możliwość mimesis w epoce relatywizacji podmiotu
At first sight it appears that Miłosz’s poetry shares many features with modernist and postmodernist poetics. One of its main themes is the impossibility of verifying the veracity of man’s sensual impressions (i.e. their referring to an ‘external’ world), which seems to undermine the traditional con...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of Silesia Press
2020-12-01
|
| Series: | Postscriptum Polonistyczne |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.journals.us.edu.pl/index.php/PPol/article/view/10750 |
| _version_ | 1818329941655158784 |
|---|---|
| author | Arent van Nieukerken |
| author_facet | Arent van Nieukerken |
| author_sort | Arent van Nieukerken |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | At first sight it appears that Miłosz’s poetry shares many features with modernist and postmodernist poetics. One of its main themes is the impossibility of verifying the veracity of man’s sensual impressions (i.e. their referring to an ‘external’ world), which seems to undermine the traditional concept of literature as ‘mimesis’. However, Miłosz expressly rejected the postmodernist point of view that literature as ‘mimesis’ is merely a textual effect. Even when the speakers in his poems expressly deny the possibility of recreating the external world of man’s sense-impressions by means of language, they seem to achieve the very thing they wanted to deny. One of Miłosz’s favourite devices in the poetry of his middle period was the so-called ‘irony of self-betrayal’. But this negative way of affirming the covenant between the self and the world did not satisfy him in the long run. Wishing to overcome the antinomies of mimesis he attempted to work out a poetical strategy allowing him to describe the astonishing richness of being more directly. This strategy required a metaphysical justification. The veracity of man’s sensual and intellectual involvement with the world turned out to be rooted in the religious perspective of ‘apokatastasis’. ‘Time past’ and ‘time present’ are one in a process that both redeems and transcends time, without annihilating the moments of which it consists. Miłosz’s long poems of the sixties and seventies should therefore not be simply understood as ‘literature’ or independent ‘works of art’ (poésie pure) that could be separated from other forms of being. In fact they are part of a process of redemption that occurs ‘here and now’, although it remains unclear when it will be completed. For that reason Miłosz’s longer poems should be read as ‘open texts’ or – but in a sense opposite to the postmodernist idea of ‘unfinishedness’ – ‘work in progress’. They purport to present the manifold phenomena of a man’s existential autobiography simultaneously. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-13T12:56:04Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-ac211b68c9e146c0b1ac33077a666496 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1898-1593 2353-9844 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-13T12:56:04Z |
| publishDate | 2020-12-01 |
| publisher | University of Silesia Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Postscriptum Polonistyczne |
| spelling | doaj.art-ac211b68c9e146c0b1ac33077a6664962022-12-21T23:45:11ZengUniversity of Silesia PressPostscriptum Polonistyczne1898-15932353-98442020-12-0171„Kłopoty z opisem rzeczy”, czyli (nie)możliwość
mimesis w epoce relatywizacji podmiotuArent van Nieukerken0doktor, profesor w Uniwersytecie Amsterdamskim.At first sight it appears that Miłosz’s poetry shares many features with modernist and postmodernist poetics. One of its main themes is the impossibility of verifying the veracity of man’s sensual impressions (i.e. their referring to an ‘external’ world), which seems to undermine the traditional concept of literature as ‘mimesis’. However, Miłosz expressly rejected the postmodernist point of view that literature as ‘mimesis’ is merely a textual effect. Even when the speakers in his poems expressly deny the possibility of recreating the external world of man’s sense-impressions by means of language, they seem to achieve the very thing they wanted to deny. One of Miłosz’s favourite devices in the poetry of his middle period was the so-called ‘irony of self-betrayal’. But this negative way of affirming the covenant between the self and the world did not satisfy him in the long run. Wishing to overcome the antinomies of mimesis he attempted to work out a poetical strategy allowing him to describe the astonishing richness of being more directly. This strategy required a metaphysical justification. The veracity of man’s sensual and intellectual involvement with the world turned out to be rooted in the religious perspective of ‘apokatastasis’. ‘Time past’ and ‘time present’ are one in a process that both redeems and transcends time, without annihilating the moments of which it consists. Miłosz’s long poems of the sixties and seventies should therefore not be simply understood as ‘literature’ or independent ‘works of art’ (poésie pure) that could be separated from other forms of being. In fact they are part of a process of redemption that occurs ‘here and now’, although it remains unclear when it will be completed. For that reason Miłosz’s longer poems should be read as ‘open texts’ or – but in a sense opposite to the postmodernist idea of ‘unfinishedness’ – ‘work in progress’. They purport to present the manifold phenomena of a man’s existential autobiography simultaneously.https://www.journals.us.edu.pl/index.php/PPol/article/view/10750Czesław MiłoszessayAmericaimagology |
| spellingShingle | Arent van Nieukerken „Kłopoty z opisem rzeczy”, czyli (nie)możliwość mimesis w epoce relatywizacji podmiotu Postscriptum Polonistyczne Czesław Miłosz essay America imagology |
| title | „Kłopoty z opisem rzeczy”, czyli (nie)możliwość
mimesis w epoce relatywizacji podmiotu |
| title_full | „Kłopoty z opisem rzeczy”, czyli (nie)możliwość
mimesis w epoce relatywizacji podmiotu |
| title_fullStr | „Kłopoty z opisem rzeczy”, czyli (nie)możliwość
mimesis w epoce relatywizacji podmiotu |
| title_full_unstemmed | „Kłopoty z opisem rzeczy”, czyli (nie)możliwość
mimesis w epoce relatywizacji podmiotu |
| title_short | „Kłopoty z opisem rzeczy”, czyli (nie)możliwość
mimesis w epoce relatywizacji podmiotu |
| title_sort | klopoty z opisem rzeczy czyli nie mozliwosc
mimesis w epoce relatywizacji podmiotu |
| topic | Czesław Miłosz essay America imagology |
| url | https://www.journals.us.edu.pl/index.php/PPol/article/view/10750 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT arentvannieukerken kłopotyzopisemrzeczyczyliniemozliwoscmimesiswepocerelatywizacjipodmiotu |