Issues of Data Acquisition and Interpretation of Paraseismic Measuring Signals Triggered by the Detonation of Explosive Charges
The paper tackles the issues of data acquisition during the measuring of vibrations caused by the detonation of explosive charges in various types of works (blasting in mines, demolition works, tunneling). Depending on the placement of an explosive charge (a charge detonated on the surface or a char...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-02-01
|
Series: | Sensors |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/4/1290 |
_version_ | 1797411241020358656 |
---|---|
author | Józef Pyra Maciej Kłaczyński |
author_facet | Józef Pyra Maciej Kłaczyński |
author_sort | Józef Pyra |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The paper tackles the issues of data acquisition during the measuring of vibrations caused by the detonation of explosive charges in various types of works (blasting in mines, demolition works, tunneling). Depending on the placement of an explosive charge (a charge detonated on the surface or a charge placed in a hole), it triggers side effects in the form of mechanical vibrations, which are propagated in the environment and may pose a hazard to buildings. In the case of propagation in the air, there is an acoustic wave and an airblast wave. For the assessment analysis on the impact of vibrations on buildings, a ground-propagated signal is used, while what is propagated by air is a disturbance. Selected examples in the paper demonstrate how an acoustic wave and an airblast wave interferes with the signal recorded by geophones. Afterwards, the paper presents the results of the tests conducted at a training area, during which various masses of explosive charges placed in different ways were detonated. The examples demonstrate that this interference may lead to the misinterpretation of recorded measurements. This paper is the first of two papers that will present the results of research into this matter and the suggested resolutions in order to eliminate this interference. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-09T04:42:10Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-ac3e381d773a4653a23ae6816152704c |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1424-8220 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-09T04:42:10Z |
publishDate | 2021-02-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Sensors |
spelling | doaj.art-ac3e381d773a4653a23ae6816152704c2023-12-03T13:19:24ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202021-02-01214129010.3390/s21041290Issues of Data Acquisition and Interpretation of Paraseismic Measuring Signals Triggered by the Detonation of Explosive ChargesJózef Pyra0Maciej Kłaczyński1Department of Mining Engineering & Occupational Safety, Faculty of Mining & Geoengineering, AGH University of Science and Technology, 30-059 Cracow, PolandDepartment of Mechanics and Vibroacoustics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Robotics, AGH University of Science and Technology, 30-059 Cracow, PolandThe paper tackles the issues of data acquisition during the measuring of vibrations caused by the detonation of explosive charges in various types of works (blasting in mines, demolition works, tunneling). Depending on the placement of an explosive charge (a charge detonated on the surface or a charge placed in a hole), it triggers side effects in the form of mechanical vibrations, which are propagated in the environment and may pose a hazard to buildings. In the case of propagation in the air, there is an acoustic wave and an airblast wave. For the assessment analysis on the impact of vibrations on buildings, a ground-propagated signal is used, while what is propagated by air is a disturbance. Selected examples in the paper demonstrate how an acoustic wave and an airblast wave interferes with the signal recorded by geophones. Afterwards, the paper presents the results of the tests conducted at a training area, during which various masses of explosive charges placed in different ways were detonated. The examples demonstrate that this interference may lead to the misinterpretation of recorded measurements. This paper is the first of two papers that will present the results of research into this matter and the suggested resolutions in order to eliminate this interference.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/4/1290vibration interferenceacoustic waveairblast shock wavevibration transducersacoustic pressure transducersdata acquisition |
spellingShingle | Józef Pyra Maciej Kłaczyński Issues of Data Acquisition and Interpretation of Paraseismic Measuring Signals Triggered by the Detonation of Explosive Charges Sensors vibration interference acoustic wave airblast shock wave vibration transducers acoustic pressure transducers data acquisition |
title | Issues of Data Acquisition and Interpretation of Paraseismic Measuring Signals Triggered by the Detonation of Explosive Charges |
title_full | Issues of Data Acquisition and Interpretation of Paraseismic Measuring Signals Triggered by the Detonation of Explosive Charges |
title_fullStr | Issues of Data Acquisition and Interpretation of Paraseismic Measuring Signals Triggered by the Detonation of Explosive Charges |
title_full_unstemmed | Issues of Data Acquisition and Interpretation of Paraseismic Measuring Signals Triggered by the Detonation of Explosive Charges |
title_short | Issues of Data Acquisition and Interpretation of Paraseismic Measuring Signals Triggered by the Detonation of Explosive Charges |
title_sort | issues of data acquisition and interpretation of paraseismic measuring signals triggered by the detonation of explosive charges |
topic | vibration interference acoustic wave airblast shock wave vibration transducers acoustic pressure transducers data acquisition |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/4/1290 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jozefpyra issuesofdataacquisitionandinterpretationofparaseismicmeasuringsignalstriggeredbythedetonationofexplosivecharges AT maciejkłaczynski issuesofdataacquisitionandinterpretationofparaseismicmeasuringsignalstriggeredbythedetonationofexplosivecharges |