Examining Scientific Evidence in US and Chinese Courts: A Comparative Study
The critical examination of scientific evidence is crucial in attempting to distinguish genuine science from "junk science" and provides judges with an important basis upon which to determine the credibility of expert witnesses giving scientific evidence. From studying the law in the USA,...
Main Author: | Bangda Chen |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2016-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Forensic Science and Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.jfsmonline.com/article.asp?issn=2349-5014;year=2016;volume=2;issue=3;spage=151;epage=159;aulast=Chen |
Similar Items
-
Laws of evidence /
by: 188071 Buckles, Thomas
Published: (2003) -
Therapists in court : providing evidence and supporting witnesses /
by: Bond, Tim, 1949-, et al.
Published: (2005) -
Mandatory appearances of forensic examiner for cross-examination in court and related systemic improvement under china's criminal procedure
by: Jianye Qu, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01) -
EVIDENTIAL SIGNIFICANCE OF EXAMINATION IN JURY TRIAL
by: T. N. Bashirov
Published: (2013-06-01) -
Forensic estimation of medical aid rendered to the patients died with traumatic brain injury (on evidences of forensic expertise)
by: A. O. Pletnetskaya
Published: (2016-08-01)