External validation of GO-FAR 2 calculator for outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest with comparison to GO-FAR and trial of expanded applications

Aim: Externally validate the GO-FAR 2 tool for predicting survival with good neurologic function after in-hospital cardiac arrest with comparison to the original GO-FAR tool. Additionally, we collected qualitative descriptors and performed exploratory analyses with various levels of neurologic funct...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rheanne Maravelas, Baturay Aydemir, Duncan Vos, Daniel Brauner, Rachel Zamihovsky, Kelly O'Sullivan, Anita F. Bell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-12-01
Series:Resuscitation Plus
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520423001054
_version_ 1797429641907011584
author Rheanne Maravelas
Baturay Aydemir
Duncan Vos
Daniel Brauner
Rachel Zamihovsky
Kelly O'Sullivan
Anita F. Bell
author_facet Rheanne Maravelas
Baturay Aydemir
Duncan Vos
Daniel Brauner
Rachel Zamihovsky
Kelly O'Sullivan
Anita F. Bell
author_sort Rheanne Maravelas
collection DOAJ
description Aim: Externally validate the GO-FAR 2 tool for predicting survival with good neurologic function after in-hospital cardiac arrest with comparison to the original GO-FAR tool. Additionally, we collected qualitative descriptors and performed exploratory analyses with various levels of neurologic function and discharge destination. Methods: Retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent in-hospital resuscitation after cardiac arrest during the calendar years 2016–2019 in our institution (n = 397). GO-FAR and GO-FAR 2 scores were calculated based on information available in the medical record at the time of hospital admission. Cerebral performance category (CPC) scores at the time of admission and discharge were assessed by chart review. Results: The GO-FAR 2 score accurately predicted outcomes in our study population with a c-statistic of 0.625. The original GO-FAR score also had accurate calibration with a stronger c-statistic of 0.726. The GO-FAR score had decreased predictive value for lesser levels of neurologic function (c-statistic 0.56 for alive at discharge) and discharge destination (0.69). Descriptors of functional status by CPC score were collected. Conclusion: Our findings support the validity of the GO-FAR and GO-FAR 2 tools as published, but the c-statistics suggest modest predictive discrimination. We include functional descriptors of CPC outcomes to aid clinicians in using these tools. We propose that information about expected outcomes could be valuable in shared decision-making conversations.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T09:16:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ac44976fb02f4a8488fcc5ef265e0629
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2666-5204
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T09:16:03Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Resuscitation Plus
spelling doaj.art-ac44976fb02f4a8488fcc5ef265e06292023-12-02T07:06:52ZengElsevierResuscitation Plus2666-52042023-12-0116100462External validation of GO-FAR 2 calculator for outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest with comparison to GO-FAR and trial of expanded applicationsRheanne Maravelas0Baturay Aydemir1Duncan Vos2Daniel Brauner3Rachel Zamihovsky4Kelly O'Sullivan5Anita F. Bell6University of Minnesota, United States; Corresponding author.Western Michigan University Homer Stryker MD School of Medicine, United StatesWestern Michigan University Homer Stryker MD School of Medicine, United StatesWestern Michigan University Homer Stryker MD School of Medicine, United StatesWestern Michigan University Homer Stryker MD School of Medicine, United StatesMichigan State University College of Human Medicine, United StatesWestern Michigan University Homer Stryker MD School of Medicine, United StatesAim: Externally validate the GO-FAR 2 tool for predicting survival with good neurologic function after in-hospital cardiac arrest with comparison to the original GO-FAR tool. Additionally, we collected qualitative descriptors and performed exploratory analyses with various levels of neurologic function and discharge destination. Methods: Retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent in-hospital resuscitation after cardiac arrest during the calendar years 2016–2019 in our institution (n = 397). GO-FAR and GO-FAR 2 scores were calculated based on information available in the medical record at the time of hospital admission. Cerebral performance category (CPC) scores at the time of admission and discharge were assessed by chart review. Results: The GO-FAR 2 score accurately predicted outcomes in our study population with a c-statistic of 0.625. The original GO-FAR score also had accurate calibration with a stronger c-statistic of 0.726. The GO-FAR score had decreased predictive value for lesser levels of neurologic function (c-statistic 0.56 for alive at discharge) and discharge destination (0.69). Descriptors of functional status by CPC score were collected. Conclusion: Our findings support the validity of the GO-FAR and GO-FAR 2 tools as published, but the c-statistics suggest modest predictive discrimination. We include functional descriptors of CPC outcomes to aid clinicians in using these tools. We propose that information about expected outcomes could be valuable in shared decision-making conversations.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520423001054In-hospital cardiac arrestOutcomesGO-FARGO-FAR 2Cerebral performance categoryNeurologic status
spellingShingle Rheanne Maravelas
Baturay Aydemir
Duncan Vos
Daniel Brauner
Rachel Zamihovsky
Kelly O'Sullivan
Anita F. Bell
External validation of GO-FAR 2 calculator for outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest with comparison to GO-FAR and trial of expanded applications
Resuscitation Plus
In-hospital cardiac arrest
Outcomes
GO-FAR
GO-FAR 2
Cerebral performance category
Neurologic status
title External validation of GO-FAR 2 calculator for outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest with comparison to GO-FAR and trial of expanded applications
title_full External validation of GO-FAR 2 calculator for outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest with comparison to GO-FAR and trial of expanded applications
title_fullStr External validation of GO-FAR 2 calculator for outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest with comparison to GO-FAR and trial of expanded applications
title_full_unstemmed External validation of GO-FAR 2 calculator for outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest with comparison to GO-FAR and trial of expanded applications
title_short External validation of GO-FAR 2 calculator for outcomes after in-hospital cardiac arrest with comparison to GO-FAR and trial of expanded applications
title_sort external validation of go far 2 calculator for outcomes after in hospital cardiac arrest with comparison to go far and trial of expanded applications
topic In-hospital cardiac arrest
Outcomes
GO-FAR
GO-FAR 2
Cerebral performance category
Neurologic status
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520423001054
work_keys_str_mv AT rheannemaravelas externalvalidationofgofar2calculatorforoutcomesafterinhospitalcardiacarrestwithcomparisontogofarandtrialofexpandedapplications
AT baturayaydemir externalvalidationofgofar2calculatorforoutcomesafterinhospitalcardiacarrestwithcomparisontogofarandtrialofexpandedapplications
AT duncanvos externalvalidationofgofar2calculatorforoutcomesafterinhospitalcardiacarrestwithcomparisontogofarandtrialofexpandedapplications
AT danielbrauner externalvalidationofgofar2calculatorforoutcomesafterinhospitalcardiacarrestwithcomparisontogofarandtrialofexpandedapplications
AT rachelzamihovsky externalvalidationofgofar2calculatorforoutcomesafterinhospitalcardiacarrestwithcomparisontogofarandtrialofexpandedapplications
AT kellyosullivan externalvalidationofgofar2calculatorforoutcomesafterinhospitalcardiacarrestwithcomparisontogofarandtrialofexpandedapplications
AT anitafbell externalvalidationofgofar2calculatorforoutcomesafterinhospitalcardiacarrestwithcomparisontogofarandtrialofexpandedapplications