A Duty to treat? A Right to refrain? Bangladeshi physicians in moral dilemma during COVID-19

Abstract Background Normally, physicians understand they have a duty to treat patients, and they perform accordingly consistent with codes of medical practice, standards of care, and inner moral motivation. In the case of COVID-19 pandemic in a developing country such as Bangladesh, however, the fac...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Norman K. Swazo, Md. Munir Hossain Talukder, Mohammad Kamrul Ahsan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-09-01
Series:Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13010-020-00091-6
_version_ 1811294759336017920
author Norman K. Swazo
Md. Munir Hossain Talukder
Mohammad Kamrul Ahsan
author_facet Norman K. Swazo
Md. Munir Hossain Talukder
Mohammad Kamrul Ahsan
author_sort Norman K. Swazo
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Normally, physicians understand they have a duty to treat patients, and they perform accordingly consistent with codes of medical practice, standards of care, and inner moral motivation. In the case of COVID-19 pandemic in a developing country such as Bangladesh, however, the fact is that some physicians decline either to report for duty or to treat patients presenting with COVID-19 symptoms. At issue ethically is whether such medical practitioners are to be automatically disciplined for dereliction of duty and gross negligence; or, on the contrary, such physicians may legitimately claim a professional right of autonomous judgment, on the basis of which professional right they may justifiably decline to treat patients. Methods This ethical issue is examined with a view to providing some guidance and recommendations, insofar as the conditions of medical practice in an under-resourced country such as Bangladesh are vastly different from medical practice in an industrialized nation such as the USA. The concept of moral dilemma as discussed by philosopher Michael Shaw Perry and philosopher Immanuel Kant’s views on moral appeal to “emergency” are considered pertinent to sorting through the moral conundrum of medical care during pandemic. Results Our analysis allows for conditional physician discretion in the decision to treat COVID-19 patients, i.e., in the absence of personal protective equipment (PPE) combined with claim of duty to family. Physicians are nonetheless expected to provide a minimum of initial clinical assessment and stabilization of a patient before initiating transfer of a patient to a “designated” COVID-19 hospital. The latter is to be done in coordination with the national center control room that can assure admission of a patient to a referral hospital prior to ambulance transport. Conclusions The presence of a moral dilemma (i.e., conflict of obligations) in the pandemic situation of clinical care requires institutional authorities to exercise tolerance of individual physician moral decision about the duty to care. Hospital or government authority should respond to such decisions without introducing immediate sanction, such as suspension from all clinical duties or termination of licensure, and instead arrange for alternative clinical duties consistent with routine medical care.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T05:22:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ac4542009d47415c94725fbc72b56c01
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1747-5341
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T05:22:12Z
publishDate 2020-09-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
spelling doaj.art-ac4542009d47415c94725fbc72b56c012022-12-22T03:00:43ZengBMCPhilosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine1747-53412020-09-0115112310.1186/s13010-020-00091-6A Duty to treat? A Right to refrain? Bangladeshi physicians in moral dilemma during COVID-19Norman K. Swazo0Md. Munir Hossain Talukder1Mohammad Kamrul Ahsan2Department of History and Philosophy, North South UniversityDepartment of Philosophy, Jahangirnagar UniversityDepartment of Philosophy, Jahangirnagar UniversityAbstract Background Normally, physicians understand they have a duty to treat patients, and they perform accordingly consistent with codes of medical practice, standards of care, and inner moral motivation. In the case of COVID-19 pandemic in a developing country such as Bangladesh, however, the fact is that some physicians decline either to report for duty or to treat patients presenting with COVID-19 symptoms. At issue ethically is whether such medical practitioners are to be automatically disciplined for dereliction of duty and gross negligence; or, on the contrary, such physicians may legitimately claim a professional right of autonomous judgment, on the basis of which professional right they may justifiably decline to treat patients. Methods This ethical issue is examined with a view to providing some guidance and recommendations, insofar as the conditions of medical practice in an under-resourced country such as Bangladesh are vastly different from medical practice in an industrialized nation such as the USA. The concept of moral dilemma as discussed by philosopher Michael Shaw Perry and philosopher Immanuel Kant’s views on moral appeal to “emergency” are considered pertinent to sorting through the moral conundrum of medical care during pandemic. Results Our analysis allows for conditional physician discretion in the decision to treat COVID-19 patients, i.e., in the absence of personal protective equipment (PPE) combined with claim of duty to family. Physicians are nonetheless expected to provide a minimum of initial clinical assessment and stabilization of a patient before initiating transfer of a patient to a “designated” COVID-19 hospital. The latter is to be done in coordination with the national center control room that can assure admission of a patient to a referral hospital prior to ambulance transport. Conclusions The presence of a moral dilemma (i.e., conflict of obligations) in the pandemic situation of clinical care requires institutional authorities to exercise tolerance of individual physician moral decision about the duty to care. Hospital or government authority should respond to such decisions without introducing immediate sanction, such as suspension from all clinical duties or termination of licensure, and instead arrange for alternative clinical duties consistent with routine medical care.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13010-020-00091-6COVID-19PandemicDuty to treatMedical ethicsBangladeshProfessional autonomy
spellingShingle Norman K. Swazo
Md. Munir Hossain Talukder
Mohammad Kamrul Ahsan
A Duty to treat? A Right to refrain? Bangladeshi physicians in moral dilemma during COVID-19
Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
COVID-19
Pandemic
Duty to treat
Medical ethics
Bangladesh
Professional autonomy
title A Duty to treat? A Right to refrain? Bangladeshi physicians in moral dilemma during COVID-19
title_full A Duty to treat? A Right to refrain? Bangladeshi physicians in moral dilemma during COVID-19
title_fullStr A Duty to treat? A Right to refrain? Bangladeshi physicians in moral dilemma during COVID-19
title_full_unstemmed A Duty to treat? A Right to refrain? Bangladeshi physicians in moral dilemma during COVID-19
title_short A Duty to treat? A Right to refrain? Bangladeshi physicians in moral dilemma during COVID-19
title_sort duty to treat a right to refrain bangladeshi physicians in moral dilemma during covid 19
topic COVID-19
Pandemic
Duty to treat
Medical ethics
Bangladesh
Professional autonomy
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13010-020-00091-6
work_keys_str_mv AT normankswazo adutytotreatarighttorefrainbangladeshiphysiciansinmoraldilemmaduringcovid19
AT mdmunirhossaintalukder adutytotreatarighttorefrainbangladeshiphysiciansinmoraldilemmaduringcovid19
AT mohammadkamrulahsan adutytotreatarighttorefrainbangladeshiphysiciansinmoraldilemmaduringcovid19
AT normankswazo dutytotreatarighttorefrainbangladeshiphysiciansinmoraldilemmaduringcovid19
AT mdmunirhossaintalukder dutytotreatarighttorefrainbangladeshiphysiciansinmoraldilemmaduringcovid19
AT mohammadkamrulahsan dutytotreatarighttorefrainbangladeshiphysiciansinmoraldilemmaduringcovid19