Detection and quantification of Verticillium dahliae and V. longisporum by droplet digital PCR versus quantitative real-time PCR

Vascular wilt, caused by Verticillium dahliae and V. longisporum, limits the quality and yield of agricultural crops. Although quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) has greatly improved the diagnosis of these two pathogens over traditional, time-consuming isolation methods, the relatively poor detection...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Di Wang, Xinya Jiao, Haijiang Jia, Shumei Cheng, Xi Jin, Youhua Wang, Yunhua Gao, Xiaofeng Su
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2022.995705/full
_version_ 1811340429733396480
author Di Wang
Xinya Jiao
Haijiang Jia
Shumei Cheng
Xi Jin
Youhua Wang
Yunhua Gao
Xiaofeng Su
author_facet Di Wang
Xinya Jiao
Haijiang Jia
Shumei Cheng
Xi Jin
Youhua Wang
Yunhua Gao
Xiaofeng Su
author_sort Di Wang
collection DOAJ
description Vascular wilt, caused by Verticillium dahliae and V. longisporum, limits the quality and yield of agricultural crops. Although quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) has greatly improved the diagnosis of these two pathogens over traditional, time-consuming isolation methods, the relatively poor detection sensitivity and high measurement bias for traceable matrix-rich samples need to be improved. Here, we thus developed a droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay for accurate, sensitive detection and quantification of V. dahliae and V. longisporum. We compared the analytical and diagnostic performance in detail of ddPCR and the corresponding qPCR assay against the genomic DNA (gDNA) of the two fungi from cultures and field samples. In our study, the species specificity, quantification linearity, analytical sensitivity, and measurement viability of the two methods were analyzed. The results indicated that ddPCR using field samples enhanced diagnostic sensitivity, decreased quantification bias, and indicated less susceptibility to inhibitors compared with qPCR. Although ddPCR was as sensitive as qPCR when using gDNA from cultures of V. dahliae and V. longisporum, its detection rates using field samples were much higher than those of qPCR, potentially due to the inhibition from residual matrix in the extracts. The results showed that digital PCR is more sensitive and accurate than qPCR for quantifying trace amounts of V. dahliae and V. longisporum and can facilitate management practices to limit or prevent their prevalence.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T18:41:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ac5f18b1596747e087635624c3db69fd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2235-2988
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T18:41:48Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
spelling doaj.art-ac5f18b1596747e087635624c3db69fd2022-12-22T02:34:42ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology2235-29882022-08-011210.3389/fcimb.2022.995705995705Detection and quantification of Verticillium dahliae and V. longisporum by droplet digital PCR versus quantitative real-time PCRDi Wang0Xinya Jiao1Haijiang Jia2Shumei Cheng3Xi Jin4Youhua Wang5Yunhua Gao6Xiaofeng Su7Center for Advanced Measurement Science, National Institute of Metrology, Beijing, ChinaCollege of Food Science and Technology, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding, ChinaRaw Material Technology Center of Guangxi Tobacco, Nanning, ChinaCollege of Food Science and Technology, Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding, ChinaHebei Technology Innovation Center for Green Management of Soil-Borne Diseases, Baoding University, Hebei, ChinaBiotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, ChinaCenter for Advanced Measurement Science, National Institute of Metrology, Beijing, ChinaBiotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, ChinaVascular wilt, caused by Verticillium dahliae and V. longisporum, limits the quality and yield of agricultural crops. Although quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) has greatly improved the diagnosis of these two pathogens over traditional, time-consuming isolation methods, the relatively poor detection sensitivity and high measurement bias for traceable matrix-rich samples need to be improved. Here, we thus developed a droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay for accurate, sensitive detection and quantification of V. dahliae and V. longisporum. We compared the analytical and diagnostic performance in detail of ddPCR and the corresponding qPCR assay against the genomic DNA (gDNA) of the two fungi from cultures and field samples. In our study, the species specificity, quantification linearity, analytical sensitivity, and measurement viability of the two methods were analyzed. The results indicated that ddPCR using field samples enhanced diagnostic sensitivity, decreased quantification bias, and indicated less susceptibility to inhibitors compared with qPCR. Although ddPCR was as sensitive as qPCR when using gDNA from cultures of V. dahliae and V. longisporum, its detection rates using field samples were much higher than those of qPCR, potentially due to the inhibition from residual matrix in the extracts. The results showed that digital PCR is more sensitive and accurate than qPCR for quantifying trace amounts of V. dahliae and V. longisporum and can facilitate management practices to limit or prevent their prevalence.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2022.995705/fulldroplet digital PCRquantitative real-time PCRsensitivityquantificationtolerance
spellingShingle Di Wang
Xinya Jiao
Haijiang Jia
Shumei Cheng
Xi Jin
Youhua Wang
Yunhua Gao
Xiaofeng Su
Detection and quantification of Verticillium dahliae and V. longisporum by droplet digital PCR versus quantitative real-time PCR
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
droplet digital PCR
quantitative real-time PCR
sensitivity
quantification
tolerance
title Detection and quantification of Verticillium dahliae and V. longisporum by droplet digital PCR versus quantitative real-time PCR
title_full Detection and quantification of Verticillium dahliae and V. longisporum by droplet digital PCR versus quantitative real-time PCR
title_fullStr Detection and quantification of Verticillium dahliae and V. longisporum by droplet digital PCR versus quantitative real-time PCR
title_full_unstemmed Detection and quantification of Verticillium dahliae and V. longisporum by droplet digital PCR versus quantitative real-time PCR
title_short Detection and quantification of Verticillium dahliae and V. longisporum by droplet digital PCR versus quantitative real-time PCR
title_sort detection and quantification of verticillium dahliae and v longisporum by droplet digital pcr versus quantitative real time pcr
topic droplet digital PCR
quantitative real-time PCR
sensitivity
quantification
tolerance
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcimb.2022.995705/full
work_keys_str_mv AT diwang detectionandquantificationofverticilliumdahliaeandvlongisporumbydropletdigitalpcrversusquantitativerealtimepcr
AT xinyajiao detectionandquantificationofverticilliumdahliaeandvlongisporumbydropletdigitalpcrversusquantitativerealtimepcr
AT haijiangjia detectionandquantificationofverticilliumdahliaeandvlongisporumbydropletdigitalpcrversusquantitativerealtimepcr
AT shumeicheng detectionandquantificationofverticilliumdahliaeandvlongisporumbydropletdigitalpcrversusquantitativerealtimepcr
AT xijin detectionandquantificationofverticilliumdahliaeandvlongisporumbydropletdigitalpcrversusquantitativerealtimepcr
AT youhuawang detectionandquantificationofverticilliumdahliaeandvlongisporumbydropletdigitalpcrversusquantitativerealtimepcr
AT yunhuagao detectionandquantificationofverticilliumdahliaeandvlongisporumbydropletdigitalpcrversusquantitativerealtimepcr
AT xiaofengsu detectionandquantificationofverticilliumdahliaeandvlongisporumbydropletdigitalpcrversusquantitativerealtimepcr