Winners and losers of the Sino–US trade war from economic and environmental perspectives

The ongoing trade war between the United States and China is having profound impacts on the global economy. As recent studies have found substantial amounts of carbon dioxide and air pollution embedded in the global supply chains, the Sino–US trade war may also affect emissions and health burdens wo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mingxi Du, Lulu Chen, Jintai Lin, Yu Liu, Kuishuang Feng, Qiuyu Liu, Yawen Liu, Jingxu Wang, Ruijing Ni, Yu Zhao, Wei Si, Ying Li, Hao Kong, Hongjian Weng, Mengyao Liu, Jamiu Adetayo Adeniran
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2020-01-01
Series:Environmental Research Letters
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aba3d5
_version_ 1797747882020831232
author Mingxi Du
Lulu Chen
Jintai Lin
Yu Liu
Kuishuang Feng
Qiuyu Liu
Yawen Liu
Jingxu Wang
Ruijing Ni
Yu Zhao
Wei Si
Ying Li
Hao Kong
Hongjian Weng
Mengyao Liu
Jamiu Adetayo Adeniran
author_facet Mingxi Du
Lulu Chen
Jintai Lin
Yu Liu
Kuishuang Feng
Qiuyu Liu
Yawen Liu
Jingxu Wang
Ruijing Ni
Yu Zhao
Wei Si
Ying Li
Hao Kong
Hongjian Weng
Mengyao Liu
Jamiu Adetayo Adeniran
author_sort Mingxi Du
collection DOAJ
description The ongoing trade war between the United States and China is having profound impacts on the global economy. As recent studies have found substantial amounts of carbon dioxide and air pollution embedded in the global supply chains, the Sino–US trade war may also affect emissions and health burdens worldwide, which remains poorly understood. Here, we estimate the potential changes in gross domestic product (GDP), anthropogenic emissions and particulate matter (PM _2.5 ) related premature deaths worldwide under two Sino–US trade war scenarios. We find that for the US and China, the trade war would reduce their GDP and, less significantly, emissions and mortality, suggesting that the trade war is not an effective means of environmental protection. The trade war would increase both GDP and mortality in many developing regions, because of their increased production of goods targeted in the Sino–US trade war. Surprisingly, Western Europe and Latin America and Caribbean would have higher GDP but lower emissions and mortality, an economic and environmental win-win outcome as a net result of the complex changes in the global supply chains. Neighbour regions of the US and China such as Canada, Japan and Korea would also have higher GDP but lower mortality, because of reduced atmospheric transboundary transport from the US and China overcompensating for increased local emissions of these neighbours. The complex consequences of the Sino–US trade war highlight the strong inter-regional and economic-environmental linkage in support of a global collaborative strategy to foster economic growth and environmental protection.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T15:56:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ac65075f48c3403aa9f059bd0f3af05f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1748-9326
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T15:56:58Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series Environmental Research Letters
spelling doaj.art-ac65075f48c3403aa9f059bd0f3af05f2023-08-09T14:53:16ZengIOP PublishingEnvironmental Research Letters1748-93262020-01-0115909403210.1088/1748-9326/aba3d5Winners and losers of the Sino–US trade war from economic and environmental perspectivesMingxi Du0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6831-4255Lulu Chen1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8929-3414Jintai Lin2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2362-2940Yu Liu3Kuishuang Feng4Qiuyu Liu5Yawen Liu6Jingxu Wang7Ruijing Ni8Yu Zhao9Wei Si10Ying Li11Hao Kong12Hongjian Weng13Mengyao Liu14Jamiu Adetayo Adeniran15Laboratory for Climate and Ocean-Atmosphere Studies, Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, School of Physics, Peking University , Beijing 100871, People’s Republic of China; These authors contributed equally to this workLaboratory for Climate and Ocean-Atmosphere Studies, Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, School of Physics, Peking University , Beijing 100871, People’s Republic of China; These authors contributed equally to this workLaboratory for Climate and Ocean-Atmosphere Studies, Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, School of Physics, Peking University , Beijing 100871, People’s Republic of ChinaInstitutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences , Beijing 100190, People’s Republic of China; School of Public Policy and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences , Beijing 100049, People’s Republic of ChinaInstitute of Blue and Green Development, Shandong University , Weihai 264209, People’s Republic of China; Department of Geographical Sciences, University of Maryland , College Park, MD, 20742, United States of AmericaDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Quebec at Montreal , Montreal H3C 3P8, CanadaInstitutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences , Beijing 100190, People’s Republic of China; School of Public Policy and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences , Beijing 100049, People’s Republic of ChinaLaboratory for Climate and Ocean-Atmosphere Studies, Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, School of Physics, Peking University , Beijing 100871, People’s Republic of ChinaLaboratory for Climate and Ocean-Atmosphere Studies, Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, School of Physics, Peking University , Beijing 100871, People’s Republic of ChinaSchool of the Environment, Nanjing University , 163 Xianlin Ave, Nanjing 210046, People’s Republic of ChinaCollege of Economics and Management, China Agricultural University , Beijing 100083, People’s Republic of ChinaChina Animal Disease Control Center , Beijing 102600, People’s Republic of ChinaLaboratory for Climate and Ocean-Atmosphere Studies, Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, School of Physics, Peking University , Beijing 100871, People’s Republic of ChinaLaboratory for Climate and Ocean-Atmosphere Studies, Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, School of Physics, Peking University , Beijing 100871, People’s Republic of ChinaRoyal Netherlands Meteorological Institute , De Bilt, The NetherlandsLaboratory for Climate and Ocean-Atmosphere Studies, Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, School of Physics, Peking University , Beijing 100871, People’s Republic of ChinaThe ongoing trade war between the United States and China is having profound impacts on the global economy. As recent studies have found substantial amounts of carbon dioxide and air pollution embedded in the global supply chains, the Sino–US trade war may also affect emissions and health burdens worldwide, which remains poorly understood. Here, we estimate the potential changes in gross domestic product (GDP), anthropogenic emissions and particulate matter (PM _2.5 ) related premature deaths worldwide under two Sino–US trade war scenarios. We find that for the US and China, the trade war would reduce their GDP and, less significantly, emissions and mortality, suggesting that the trade war is not an effective means of environmental protection. The trade war would increase both GDP and mortality in many developing regions, because of their increased production of goods targeted in the Sino–US trade war. Surprisingly, Western Europe and Latin America and Caribbean would have higher GDP but lower emissions and mortality, an economic and environmental win-win outcome as a net result of the complex changes in the global supply chains. Neighbour regions of the US and China such as Canada, Japan and Korea would also have higher GDP but lower mortality, because of reduced atmospheric transboundary transport from the US and China overcompensating for increased local emissions of these neighbours. The complex consequences of the Sino–US trade war highlight the strong inter-regional and economic-environmental linkage in support of a global collaborative strategy to foster economic growth and environmental protection.https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aba3d5air pollutionatmospheric transportinternational trade
spellingShingle Mingxi Du
Lulu Chen
Jintai Lin
Yu Liu
Kuishuang Feng
Qiuyu Liu
Yawen Liu
Jingxu Wang
Ruijing Ni
Yu Zhao
Wei Si
Ying Li
Hao Kong
Hongjian Weng
Mengyao Liu
Jamiu Adetayo Adeniran
Winners and losers of the Sino–US trade war from economic and environmental perspectives
Environmental Research Letters
air pollution
atmospheric transport
international trade
title Winners and losers of the Sino–US trade war from economic and environmental perspectives
title_full Winners and losers of the Sino–US trade war from economic and environmental perspectives
title_fullStr Winners and losers of the Sino–US trade war from economic and environmental perspectives
title_full_unstemmed Winners and losers of the Sino–US trade war from economic and environmental perspectives
title_short Winners and losers of the Sino–US trade war from economic and environmental perspectives
title_sort winners and losers of the sino us trade war from economic and environmental perspectives
topic air pollution
atmospheric transport
international trade
url https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aba3d5
work_keys_str_mv AT mingxidu winnersandlosersofthesinoustradewarfromeconomicandenvironmentalperspectives
AT luluchen winnersandlosersofthesinoustradewarfromeconomicandenvironmentalperspectives
AT jintailin winnersandlosersofthesinoustradewarfromeconomicandenvironmentalperspectives
AT yuliu winnersandlosersofthesinoustradewarfromeconomicandenvironmentalperspectives
AT kuishuangfeng winnersandlosersofthesinoustradewarfromeconomicandenvironmentalperspectives
AT qiuyuliu winnersandlosersofthesinoustradewarfromeconomicandenvironmentalperspectives
AT yawenliu winnersandlosersofthesinoustradewarfromeconomicandenvironmentalperspectives
AT jingxuwang winnersandlosersofthesinoustradewarfromeconomicandenvironmentalperspectives
AT ruijingni winnersandlosersofthesinoustradewarfromeconomicandenvironmentalperspectives
AT yuzhao winnersandlosersofthesinoustradewarfromeconomicandenvironmentalperspectives
AT weisi winnersandlosersofthesinoustradewarfromeconomicandenvironmentalperspectives
AT yingli winnersandlosersofthesinoustradewarfromeconomicandenvironmentalperspectives
AT haokong winnersandlosersofthesinoustradewarfromeconomicandenvironmentalperspectives
AT hongjianweng winnersandlosersofthesinoustradewarfromeconomicandenvironmentalperspectives
AT mengyaoliu winnersandlosersofthesinoustradewarfromeconomicandenvironmentalperspectives
AT jamiuadetayoadeniran winnersandlosersofthesinoustradewarfromeconomicandenvironmentalperspectives