Factors influencing waiting time in hypospadias repair surgery

Aims: Hypospadias is a common congenital anomaly of the urethra and phallus, which is not life threatening. It is thus less prioritised in a resource-limited setting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the management of hypospadias by our paediatric surgery unit and determine the factors affectin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hestia O Idiodi-Thomas, Adesoji O Ademuyiwa, Olumide A Elebute, Felix M Alakaloko, Christopher O Bode
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2016-01-01
Series:Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.npmj.org/article.asp?issn=1117-1936;year=2016;volume=23;issue=1;spage=21;epage=24;aulast=Idiodi-Thomas
_version_ 1828430188453560320
author Hestia O Idiodi-Thomas
Adesoji O Ademuyiwa
Olumide A Elebute
Felix M Alakaloko
Christopher O Bode
author_facet Hestia O Idiodi-Thomas
Adesoji O Ademuyiwa
Olumide A Elebute
Felix M Alakaloko
Christopher O Bode
author_sort Hestia O Idiodi-Thomas
collection DOAJ
description Aims: Hypospadias is a common congenital anomaly of the urethra and phallus, which is not life threatening. It is thus less prioritised in a resource-limited setting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the management of hypospadias by our paediatric surgery unit and determine the factors affecting the delay between presentation and surgical repair while proffering possible solutions to such delay in hypospadias repair surgery. Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective review of all hypospadias repair surgeries carried out by our paediatric surgery unit over a 38-month period, evaluating the period between presentation and first surgery for each patient. Data were analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0 (IBM Corp., Released 2011, Armonk, NY, USA). Chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables and P ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. Results: In 38 months, 47 operations for hypospadias were carried out on 42 boys. Thirty-seven patients (88.1%) had >3 months delay to surgery. The most frequent contributory factor to delay was unavailable theatre space (13 patients, 31%). Surgical outcome was good in only 16 patients (44%). Of the 16 patients with good outcome, 10 (63%) were operated between the ages of 2-4 years (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Multiple factors are responsible for delays in carrying out hypospadias surgery in resource-limited environments, notably securing a functional operating theatre suite in the light of more urgent conditions. To combat these delays, we recommend having dedicated hypospadias repair sessions and surgeons dedicated to hypospadias repair. Hypospadias outreach camps are also proposed.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T17:44:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ac6cf779e4494897a1d05ba6e6d44e85
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1117-1936
2468-6875
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T17:44:56Z
publishDate 2016-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal
spelling doaj.art-ac6cf779e4494897a1d05ba6e6d44e852022-12-22T01:39:16ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsNigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal1117-19362468-68752016-01-01231212410.4103/1117-1936.180152Factors influencing waiting time in hypospadias repair surgeryHestia O Idiodi-ThomasAdesoji O AdemuyiwaOlumide A ElebuteFelix M AlakalokoChristopher O BodeAims: Hypospadias is a common congenital anomaly of the urethra and phallus, which is not life threatening. It is thus less prioritised in a resource-limited setting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the management of hypospadias by our paediatric surgery unit and determine the factors affecting the delay between presentation and surgical repair while proffering possible solutions to such delay in hypospadias repair surgery. Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective review of all hypospadias repair surgeries carried out by our paediatric surgery unit over a 38-month period, evaluating the period between presentation and first surgery for each patient. Data were analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0 (IBM Corp., Released 2011, Armonk, NY, USA). Chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables and P ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. Results: In 38 months, 47 operations for hypospadias were carried out on 42 boys. Thirty-seven patients (88.1%) had >3 months delay to surgery. The most frequent contributory factor to delay was unavailable theatre space (13 patients, 31%). Surgical outcome was good in only 16 patients (44%). Of the 16 patients with good outcome, 10 (63%) were operated between the ages of 2-4 years (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Multiple factors are responsible for delays in carrying out hypospadias surgery in resource-limited environments, notably securing a functional operating theatre suite in the light of more urgent conditions. To combat these delays, we recommend having dedicated hypospadias repair sessions and surgeons dedicated to hypospadias repair. Hypospadias outreach camps are also proposed.http://www.npmj.org/article.asp?issn=1117-1936;year=2016;volume=23;issue=1;spage=21;epage=24;aulast=Idiodi-Thomashypospadiashypospadiologywaiting times
spellingShingle Hestia O Idiodi-Thomas
Adesoji O Ademuyiwa
Olumide A Elebute
Felix M Alakaloko
Christopher O Bode
Factors influencing waiting time in hypospadias repair surgery
Nigerian Postgraduate Medical Journal
hypospadias
hypospadiology
waiting times
title Factors influencing waiting time in hypospadias repair surgery
title_full Factors influencing waiting time in hypospadias repair surgery
title_fullStr Factors influencing waiting time in hypospadias repair surgery
title_full_unstemmed Factors influencing waiting time in hypospadias repair surgery
title_short Factors influencing waiting time in hypospadias repair surgery
title_sort factors influencing waiting time in hypospadias repair surgery
topic hypospadias
hypospadiology
waiting times
url http://www.npmj.org/article.asp?issn=1117-1936;year=2016;volume=23;issue=1;spage=21;epage=24;aulast=Idiodi-Thomas
work_keys_str_mv AT hestiaoidiodithomas factorsinfluencingwaitingtimeinhypospadiasrepairsurgery
AT adesojioademuyiwa factorsinfluencingwaitingtimeinhypospadiasrepairsurgery
AT olumideaelebute factorsinfluencingwaitingtimeinhypospadiasrepairsurgery
AT felixmalakaloko factorsinfluencingwaitingtimeinhypospadiasrepairsurgery
AT christopherobode factorsinfluencingwaitingtimeinhypospadiasrepairsurgery