Low adherence to exercise may have influenced the proportion of OMERACT-OARSI responders in an integrated osteoarthritis care model: secondary analyses from a cluster-randomised stepped-wedge trial
Abstract Background To address the well-documented gap between hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA) treatment recommendations and current clinical practice, a structured model for integrated OA care was developed and evaluated in a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised controlled trial. The current study use...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-04-01
|
Series: | BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-020-03235-z |
_version_ | 1818306214246744064 |
---|---|
author | Tuva Moseng Hanne Dagfinrud Leti van Bodegom-Vos Krysia Dziedzic Kåre Birger Hagen Bård Natvig Jan Harald Røtterud Thea Vliet Vlieland Nina Østerås |
author_facet | Tuva Moseng Hanne Dagfinrud Leti van Bodegom-Vos Krysia Dziedzic Kåre Birger Hagen Bård Natvig Jan Harald Røtterud Thea Vliet Vlieland Nina Østerås |
author_sort | Tuva Moseng |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background To address the well-documented gap between hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA) treatment recommendations and current clinical practice, a structured model for integrated OA care was developed and evaluated in a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised controlled trial. The current study used secondary outcomes to evaluate clinically important response to treatment through the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials clinical responder criteria (OMERACT-OARSI responder criteria) after 3 and 6 months between patients receiving the structured OA care model vs. usual care. Secondly, the study aimed to investigate if the proportion of responders in the intervention group was influenced by adherence to the exercise program inherent in the model. Methods The study was conducted in primary healthcare in six Norwegian municipalities. General practitioners and physiotherapists received training in OA treatment recommendations and use of the structured model. The intervention group attended a physiotherapist-led OA education program and performed individually tailored exercises for 8–12 weeks. The control group received usual care. Patient-reported pain, function and global assessment of disease activity during the last week were evaluated using 11-point numeric rating scales (NRS 0–10). These scores were used to calculate the proportion of OMERACT-OARSI responders. Two-level mixed logistic regression models were fitted to investigate differences in responders between the intervention and control group. Results Two hundred eighty-four intervention and 109 control group participants with hip and knee OA recruited from primary care in six Norwegian municipalities. In total 47% of the intervention and 35% of the control group participants were responders at 3 or 6 months combined; showing an uncertain between-group difference (ORadjusted 1.38 (95% CI 0.41, 4.67). In the intervention group, 184 participants completed the exercise programme (exercised ≥2 times/week for ≥8 weeks) and 55% of these were classified as responders. In contrast, 28% of the 86 non-completers were classified as responders. Conclusions The difference in proportion of OMERACT-OARSI responders at 3 and 6 months between the intervention and control group was uncertain. In the intervention group, a larger proportion of responders were seen among the exercise completers compared to the non-completers. Clinical trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02333656 . Registered 7. January 2015. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-13T06:38:55Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-ac729548075648b78457737372fb392a |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1471-2474 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-13T06:38:55Z |
publishDate | 2020-04-01 |
publisher | BMC |
record_format | Article |
series | BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders |
spelling | doaj.art-ac729548075648b78457737372fb392a2022-12-21T23:56:28ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742020-04-0121111110.1186/s12891-020-03235-zLow adherence to exercise may have influenced the proportion of OMERACT-OARSI responders in an integrated osteoarthritis care model: secondary analyses from a cluster-randomised stepped-wedge trialTuva Moseng0Hanne Dagfinrud1Leti van Bodegom-Vos2Krysia Dziedzic3Kåre Birger Hagen4Bård Natvig5Jan Harald Røtterud6Thea Vliet Vlieland7Nina Østerås8National Advisory Unit on Rehabilitation in Rheumatology, Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet HospitalNational Advisory Unit on Rehabilitation in Rheumatology, Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet HospitalDepartment of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical CenterSchool for Primary, Community and Social Care, Primary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, Keele UniversityNational Advisory Unit on Rehabilitation in Rheumatology, Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet HospitalDepartment of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, University of OsloDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Akershus University HospitalDepartment of Orthopaedics, Leiden University Medical CenterNational Advisory Unit on Rehabilitation in Rheumatology, Department of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet HospitalAbstract Background To address the well-documented gap between hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA) treatment recommendations and current clinical practice, a structured model for integrated OA care was developed and evaluated in a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised controlled trial. The current study used secondary outcomes to evaluate clinically important response to treatment through the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials clinical responder criteria (OMERACT-OARSI responder criteria) after 3 and 6 months between patients receiving the structured OA care model vs. usual care. Secondly, the study aimed to investigate if the proportion of responders in the intervention group was influenced by adherence to the exercise program inherent in the model. Methods The study was conducted in primary healthcare in six Norwegian municipalities. General practitioners and physiotherapists received training in OA treatment recommendations and use of the structured model. The intervention group attended a physiotherapist-led OA education program and performed individually tailored exercises for 8–12 weeks. The control group received usual care. Patient-reported pain, function and global assessment of disease activity during the last week were evaluated using 11-point numeric rating scales (NRS 0–10). These scores were used to calculate the proportion of OMERACT-OARSI responders. Two-level mixed logistic regression models were fitted to investigate differences in responders between the intervention and control group. Results Two hundred eighty-four intervention and 109 control group participants with hip and knee OA recruited from primary care in six Norwegian municipalities. In total 47% of the intervention and 35% of the control group participants were responders at 3 or 6 months combined; showing an uncertain between-group difference (ORadjusted 1.38 (95% CI 0.41, 4.67). In the intervention group, 184 participants completed the exercise programme (exercised ≥2 times/week for ≥8 weeks) and 55% of these were classified as responders. In contrast, 28% of the 86 non-completers were classified as responders. Conclusions The difference in proportion of OMERACT-OARSI responders at 3 and 6 months between the intervention and control group was uncertain. In the intervention group, a larger proportion of responders were seen among the exercise completers compared to the non-completers. Clinical trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02333656 . Registered 7. January 2015.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-020-03235-zOsteoarthritisHipKneeManagementRCTExercise |
spellingShingle | Tuva Moseng Hanne Dagfinrud Leti van Bodegom-Vos Krysia Dziedzic Kåre Birger Hagen Bård Natvig Jan Harald Røtterud Thea Vliet Vlieland Nina Østerås Low adherence to exercise may have influenced the proportion of OMERACT-OARSI responders in an integrated osteoarthritis care model: secondary analyses from a cluster-randomised stepped-wedge trial BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Osteoarthritis Hip Knee Management RCT Exercise |
title | Low adherence to exercise may have influenced the proportion of OMERACT-OARSI responders in an integrated osteoarthritis care model: secondary analyses from a cluster-randomised stepped-wedge trial |
title_full | Low adherence to exercise may have influenced the proportion of OMERACT-OARSI responders in an integrated osteoarthritis care model: secondary analyses from a cluster-randomised stepped-wedge trial |
title_fullStr | Low adherence to exercise may have influenced the proportion of OMERACT-OARSI responders in an integrated osteoarthritis care model: secondary analyses from a cluster-randomised stepped-wedge trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Low adherence to exercise may have influenced the proportion of OMERACT-OARSI responders in an integrated osteoarthritis care model: secondary analyses from a cluster-randomised stepped-wedge trial |
title_short | Low adherence to exercise may have influenced the proportion of OMERACT-OARSI responders in an integrated osteoarthritis care model: secondary analyses from a cluster-randomised stepped-wedge trial |
title_sort | low adherence to exercise may have influenced the proportion of omeract oarsi responders in an integrated osteoarthritis care model secondary analyses from a cluster randomised stepped wedge trial |
topic | Osteoarthritis Hip Knee Management RCT Exercise |
url | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-020-03235-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tuvamoseng lowadherencetoexercisemayhaveinfluencedtheproportionofomeractoarsirespondersinanintegratedosteoarthritiscaremodelsecondaryanalysesfromaclusterrandomisedsteppedwedgetrial AT hannedagfinrud lowadherencetoexercisemayhaveinfluencedtheproportionofomeractoarsirespondersinanintegratedosteoarthritiscaremodelsecondaryanalysesfromaclusterrandomisedsteppedwedgetrial AT letivanbodegomvos lowadherencetoexercisemayhaveinfluencedtheproportionofomeractoarsirespondersinanintegratedosteoarthritiscaremodelsecondaryanalysesfromaclusterrandomisedsteppedwedgetrial AT krysiadziedzic lowadherencetoexercisemayhaveinfluencedtheproportionofomeractoarsirespondersinanintegratedosteoarthritiscaremodelsecondaryanalysesfromaclusterrandomisedsteppedwedgetrial AT karebirgerhagen lowadherencetoexercisemayhaveinfluencedtheproportionofomeractoarsirespondersinanintegratedosteoarthritiscaremodelsecondaryanalysesfromaclusterrandomisedsteppedwedgetrial AT bardnatvig lowadherencetoexercisemayhaveinfluencedtheproportionofomeractoarsirespondersinanintegratedosteoarthritiscaremodelsecondaryanalysesfromaclusterrandomisedsteppedwedgetrial AT janharaldrøtterud lowadherencetoexercisemayhaveinfluencedtheproportionofomeractoarsirespondersinanintegratedosteoarthritiscaremodelsecondaryanalysesfromaclusterrandomisedsteppedwedgetrial AT theavlietvlieland lowadherencetoexercisemayhaveinfluencedtheproportionofomeractoarsirespondersinanintegratedosteoarthritiscaremodelsecondaryanalysesfromaclusterrandomisedsteppedwedgetrial AT ninaøsteras lowadherencetoexercisemayhaveinfluencedtheproportionofomeractoarsirespondersinanintegratedosteoarthritiscaremodelsecondaryanalysesfromaclusterrandomisedsteppedwedgetrial |