Dosing transcranial magnetic stimulation in major depressive disorder: Relations between number of treatment sessions and effectiveness in a large patient registry

Background: The number of sessions in an acute TMS course for major depressive disorder (MDD) is greater than in the earlier randomized controlled trials. Objective: To compare clinical outcomes in groups that received differing numbers of TMS sessions. Methods: From a registry sample (N = 13,732),...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Todd M. Hutton, Scott T. Aaronson, Linda L. Carpenter, Kenneth Pages, David Krantz, Lindsay Lucas, Bing Chen, Harold A. Sackeim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-09-01
Series:Brain Stimulation
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X23019265
_version_ 1797644706399649792
author Todd M. Hutton
Scott T. Aaronson
Linda L. Carpenter
Kenneth Pages
David Krantz
Lindsay Lucas
Bing Chen
Harold A. Sackeim
author_facet Todd M. Hutton
Scott T. Aaronson
Linda L. Carpenter
Kenneth Pages
David Krantz
Lindsay Lucas
Bing Chen
Harold A. Sackeim
author_sort Todd M. Hutton
collection DOAJ
description Background: The number of sessions in an acute TMS course for major depressive disorder (MDD) is greater than in the earlier randomized controlled trials. Objective: To compare clinical outcomes in groups that received differing numbers of TMS sessions. Methods: From a registry sample (N = 13,732), data were extracted for 7215 patients treated for MDD with PHQ-9 assessments before and after their TMS course. Groups were defined by number of acute course treatment sessions: 1–19 (N = 658), 20–29 (N = 616), 30–35 (N = 1375), 36 (N = 3591), 37–41 (N = 626), or >41 (N = 349) and compared in clinical outcomes at endpoint and at fixed intervals (after 10, 20, 30, and 36 sessions). The impact of additional treatments beyond 36 sessions was also examined. Results: Groups that received fewer than 30 sessions had inferior endpoint outcomes than all other groups. PHQ-9 symptom reduction was greatest in the group that ended treatment at 36 sessions. The extended treatment groups (>36 sessions) differed from all other groups by manifesting less antidepressant response early in the course and had a slower but steady rate of improvement over time. Extending treatment beyond 36 sessions was associated with further improvement without evidence of a plateau. Conclusions: In real-world practice, there are strong relations between the number of TMS sessions in a course and the magnitude of symptom reduction. Courses with less than 30 sessions are associated with diminished benefit. Patients with longer than standard courses typically show less initial improvement and a more gradual trajectory, but meaningful benefit accrues with treatment beyond 36 sessions.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T14:35:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ac81f2248ce44dcaa1523e9b88e247d6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1935-861X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T14:35:59Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Brain Stimulation
spelling doaj.art-ac81f2248ce44dcaa1523e9b88e247d62023-10-31T04:09:10ZengElsevierBrain Stimulation1935-861X2023-09-0116515101521Dosing transcranial magnetic stimulation in major depressive disorder: Relations between number of treatment sessions and effectiveness in a large patient registryTodd M. Hutton0Scott T. Aaronson1Linda L. Carpenter2Kenneth Pages3David Krantz4Lindsay Lucas5Bing Chen6Harold A. Sackeim7Southern California TMS Center, Pasadena, CA, USASheppard Pratt Health System, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USAButler Hospital, Providence, RI, USA; Brown University Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Providence, RI, USATMS of South Tampa, Tampa, FL, USANAMSA, St. Louis Park, MN, USANAMSA, St. Louis Park, MN, USANAMSA, St. Louis Park, MN, USADepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University, NY, USA; Department of Radiology, Columbia University, NY, USA; Corresponding author. Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.Background: The number of sessions in an acute TMS course for major depressive disorder (MDD) is greater than in the earlier randomized controlled trials. Objective: To compare clinical outcomes in groups that received differing numbers of TMS sessions. Methods: From a registry sample (N = 13,732), data were extracted for 7215 patients treated for MDD with PHQ-9 assessments before and after their TMS course. Groups were defined by number of acute course treatment sessions: 1–19 (N = 658), 20–29 (N = 616), 30–35 (N = 1375), 36 (N = 3591), 37–41 (N = 626), or >41 (N = 349) and compared in clinical outcomes at endpoint and at fixed intervals (after 10, 20, 30, and 36 sessions). The impact of additional treatments beyond 36 sessions was also examined. Results: Groups that received fewer than 30 sessions had inferior endpoint outcomes than all other groups. PHQ-9 symptom reduction was greatest in the group that ended treatment at 36 sessions. The extended treatment groups (>36 sessions) differed from all other groups by manifesting less antidepressant response early in the course and had a slower but steady rate of improvement over time. Extending treatment beyond 36 sessions was associated with further improvement without evidence of a plateau. Conclusions: In real-world practice, there are strong relations between the number of TMS sessions in a course and the magnitude of symptom reduction. Courses with less than 30 sessions are associated with diminished benefit. Patients with longer than standard courses typically show less initial improvement and a more gradual trajectory, but meaningful benefit accrues with treatment beyond 36 sessions.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X23019265Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)EfficacyTreatment durationNumber of sessionsRegistry
spellingShingle Todd M. Hutton
Scott T. Aaronson
Linda L. Carpenter
Kenneth Pages
David Krantz
Lindsay Lucas
Bing Chen
Harold A. Sackeim
Dosing transcranial magnetic stimulation in major depressive disorder: Relations between number of treatment sessions and effectiveness in a large patient registry
Brain Stimulation
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)
Efficacy
Treatment duration
Number of sessions
Registry
title Dosing transcranial magnetic stimulation in major depressive disorder: Relations between number of treatment sessions and effectiveness in a large patient registry
title_full Dosing transcranial magnetic stimulation in major depressive disorder: Relations between number of treatment sessions and effectiveness in a large patient registry
title_fullStr Dosing transcranial magnetic stimulation in major depressive disorder: Relations between number of treatment sessions and effectiveness in a large patient registry
title_full_unstemmed Dosing transcranial magnetic stimulation in major depressive disorder: Relations between number of treatment sessions and effectiveness in a large patient registry
title_short Dosing transcranial magnetic stimulation in major depressive disorder: Relations between number of treatment sessions and effectiveness in a large patient registry
title_sort dosing transcranial magnetic stimulation in major depressive disorder relations between number of treatment sessions and effectiveness in a large patient registry
topic Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)
Efficacy
Treatment duration
Number of sessions
Registry
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X23019265
work_keys_str_mv AT toddmhutton dosingtranscranialmagneticstimulationinmajordepressivedisorderrelationsbetweennumberoftreatmentsessionsandeffectivenessinalargepatientregistry
AT scotttaaronson dosingtranscranialmagneticstimulationinmajordepressivedisorderrelationsbetweennumberoftreatmentsessionsandeffectivenessinalargepatientregistry
AT lindalcarpenter dosingtranscranialmagneticstimulationinmajordepressivedisorderrelationsbetweennumberoftreatmentsessionsandeffectivenessinalargepatientregistry
AT kennethpages dosingtranscranialmagneticstimulationinmajordepressivedisorderrelationsbetweennumberoftreatmentsessionsandeffectivenessinalargepatientregistry
AT davidkrantz dosingtranscranialmagneticstimulationinmajordepressivedisorderrelationsbetweennumberoftreatmentsessionsandeffectivenessinalargepatientregistry
AT lindsaylucas dosingtranscranialmagneticstimulationinmajordepressivedisorderrelationsbetweennumberoftreatmentsessionsandeffectivenessinalargepatientregistry
AT bingchen dosingtranscranialmagneticstimulationinmajordepressivedisorderrelationsbetweennumberoftreatmentsessionsandeffectivenessinalargepatientregistry
AT haroldasackeim dosingtranscranialmagneticstimulationinmajordepressivedisorderrelationsbetweennumberoftreatmentsessionsandeffectivenessinalargepatientregistry