Surgical treatment of ishemic mitral regurgitation: Repair, replacement or revascularization alone?

Introduction. Treatment of ischemic mitral regurgitation in patients that require revascularization of myocardium is still debatable. Objective. The aim of this study was to compare three surgical approaches: valve repair and revascularization; valve replacement and revascularization, and revascular...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vraneš Mile, Velinović Miloš, Kočica Mladen, Mikić Aleksandar, Putnik Svetozar, Đukić Petar, Đorđević Aleksandar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Serbian Medical Society 2010-01-01
Series:Srpski Arhiv za Celokupno Lekarstvo
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0370-8179/2010/0370-81791008425V.pdf
_version_ 1818919950564196352
author Vraneš Mile
Velinović Miloš
Kočica Mladen
Mikić Aleksandar
Putnik Svetozar
Đukić Petar
Đorđević Aleksandar
author_facet Vraneš Mile
Velinović Miloš
Kočica Mladen
Mikić Aleksandar
Putnik Svetozar
Đukić Petar
Đorđević Aleksandar
author_sort Vraneš Mile
collection DOAJ
description Introduction. Treatment of ischemic mitral regurgitation in patients that require revascularization of myocardium is still debatable. Objective. The aim of this study was to compare three surgical approaches: valve repair and revascularization; valve replacement and revascularization, and revascularization alone. Methods. In 2006 and 2007 at the Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases, Clinical Centre of Serbia, Belgrade, 1,040 patients with coronary disease underwent surgery. Forty-three patients (4.3%) had also mitral insufficiency 3-4+. The patients were examined clinically, echocardiographically and haemodynamically. In group I there were 14 (32.3%) patients, in group II 16 (37.2%) patients and in group III 3 (30.5%) patients. Ninetythree per cent of patients were classified as New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III and IV, and three (7%) patients had congestive heart weakness with ejection fraction ≤30%. The decision as to surgical procedure was made by the surgeon. Postoperatively, patients were checked clinically and echocardiographically after 3, 6 and 12 months. The follow-up period was approximately 15 months (8-20). Results. Hospital mortality for the whole group was 6.9% (3 patients). In group I mortality was 14.2% (2 patients), in group II 6.25% and in group III there was no mortality. Long term results, up to 15 months, showed 100% survival in groups I and II, and in group III one patient died (7.7%). Conclusion. Short term results up to 30 days were best in group III, but longer term results were better in groups I and II.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T01:14:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ac85acf92e984edf835cd5cd121492d3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0370-8179
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T01:14:00Z
publishDate 2010-01-01
publisher Serbian Medical Society
record_format Article
series Srpski Arhiv za Celokupno Lekarstvo
spelling doaj.art-ac85acf92e984edf835cd5cd121492d32022-12-21T19:58:37ZengSerbian Medical SocietySrpski Arhiv za Celokupno Lekarstvo0370-81792010-01-011387-842542910.2298/SARH1008425VSurgical treatment of ishemic mitral regurgitation: Repair, replacement or revascularization alone?Vraneš MileVelinović MilošKočica MladenMikić AleksandarPutnik SvetozarĐukić PetarĐorđević AleksandarIntroduction. Treatment of ischemic mitral regurgitation in patients that require revascularization of myocardium is still debatable. Objective. The aim of this study was to compare three surgical approaches: valve repair and revascularization; valve replacement and revascularization, and revascularization alone. Methods. In 2006 and 2007 at the Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases, Clinical Centre of Serbia, Belgrade, 1,040 patients with coronary disease underwent surgery. Forty-three patients (4.3%) had also mitral insufficiency 3-4+. The patients were examined clinically, echocardiographically and haemodynamically. In group I there were 14 (32.3%) patients, in group II 16 (37.2%) patients and in group III 3 (30.5%) patients. Ninetythree per cent of patients were classified as New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III and IV, and three (7%) patients had congestive heart weakness with ejection fraction ≤30%. The decision as to surgical procedure was made by the surgeon. Postoperatively, patients were checked clinically and echocardiographically after 3, 6 and 12 months. The follow-up period was approximately 15 months (8-20). Results. Hospital mortality for the whole group was 6.9% (3 patients). In group I mortality was 14.2% (2 patients), in group II 6.25% and in group III there was no mortality. Long term results, up to 15 months, showed 100% survival in groups I and II, and in group III one patient died (7.7%). Conclusion. Short term results up to 30 days were best in group III, but longer term results were better in groups I and II.http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0370-8179/2010/0370-81791008425V.pdfischemic mitral valve regurgitationcoronary artery diseaserevascularizationrepair of mitral valvemitral valve replacement
spellingShingle Vraneš Mile
Velinović Miloš
Kočica Mladen
Mikić Aleksandar
Putnik Svetozar
Đukić Petar
Đorđević Aleksandar
Surgical treatment of ishemic mitral regurgitation: Repair, replacement or revascularization alone?
Srpski Arhiv za Celokupno Lekarstvo
ischemic mitral valve regurgitation
coronary artery disease
revascularization
repair of mitral valve
mitral valve replacement
title Surgical treatment of ishemic mitral regurgitation: Repair, replacement or revascularization alone?
title_full Surgical treatment of ishemic mitral regurgitation: Repair, replacement or revascularization alone?
title_fullStr Surgical treatment of ishemic mitral regurgitation: Repair, replacement or revascularization alone?
title_full_unstemmed Surgical treatment of ishemic mitral regurgitation: Repair, replacement or revascularization alone?
title_short Surgical treatment of ishemic mitral regurgitation: Repair, replacement or revascularization alone?
title_sort surgical treatment of ishemic mitral regurgitation repair replacement or revascularization alone
topic ischemic mitral valve regurgitation
coronary artery disease
revascularization
repair of mitral valve
mitral valve replacement
url http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0370-8179/2010/0370-81791008425V.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT vranesmile surgicaltreatmentofishemicmitralregurgitationrepairreplacementorrevascularizationalone
AT velinovicmilos surgicaltreatmentofishemicmitralregurgitationrepairreplacementorrevascularizationalone
AT kocicamladen surgicaltreatmentofishemicmitralregurgitationrepairreplacementorrevascularizationalone
AT mikicaleksandar surgicaltreatmentofishemicmitralregurgitationrepairreplacementorrevascularizationalone
AT putniksvetozar surgicaltreatmentofishemicmitralregurgitationrepairreplacementorrevascularizationalone
AT đukicpetar surgicaltreatmentofishemicmitralregurgitationrepairreplacementorrevascularizationalone
AT đorđevicaleksandar surgicaltreatmentofishemicmitralregurgitationrepairreplacementorrevascularizationalone