Intersectional AI is essential: polyvocal, multimodal, experimental methods to save artificial intelligence

Artificial intelligence is quietly shaping social structures and private lives. Although it promises parity and efficiency, its computational processes mirror biases of existing power even as often-proprietary data practices and cultural perceptions of computational magic obscure those influences. H...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sarah Ciston
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Católica Portuguesa 2019-05-01
Series:Journal of Science and Technology of the Arts
Subjects:
Online Access:https://revistas.ucp.pt/index.php/jsta/article/view/7328
Description
Summary:Artificial intelligence is quietly shaping social structures and private lives. Although it promises parity and efficiency, its computational processes mirror biases of existing power even as often-proprietary data practices and cultural perceptions of computational magic obscure those influences. However, intersectionality—which foregrounds an analysis of institutional power and incorporates queer, feminist, and critical race theories—can help to rethink artificial intelligence. An intersectional framework can be used to analyze the biases and problems built into existing artificial intelligence, as well as to uncover alternative ethics from its counter-histories. This paper calls for the application of intersectional strategies to artificial intelligence at every level, from data to design to implementation, from technologist to user. Drawing on intersectional theories, the research argues these strategies are polyvocal, multimodal, and experimental—suggesting that community-focused and artistic practices can help imagine AI’s intersectional possibilities and help begin to address its biases
ISSN:1646-9798
2183-0088