Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy of Transforaminal Endoscopy and Microtubular Technology for the Treatment of Lumbar Dumbbell-Shaped Tumors

Objective To analyze differences in feasibility and efficacy between the paravertebral approach and microtubular tumorectomy (PAMT) or percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic tumorectomy (PTET) for the treatment of lumbar dumbbell-shaped tumors. Methods Clinical data of dumbbell-shaped lumbar tumors...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rui Wang, Ze Yan Liang, Yan Chen, Chun Mei Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society 2022-09-01
Series:Neurospine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://e-neurospine.org/upload/pdf/ns-2244152-076.pdf
_version_ 1827365261045399552
author Rui Wang
Ze Yan Liang
Yan Chen
Chun Mei Chen
author_facet Rui Wang
Ze Yan Liang
Yan Chen
Chun Mei Chen
author_sort Rui Wang
collection DOAJ
description Objective To analyze differences in feasibility and efficacy between the paravertebral approach and microtubular tumorectomy (PAMT) or percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic tumorectomy (PTET) for the treatment of lumbar dumbbell-shaped tumors. Methods Clinical data of dumbbell-shaped lumbar tumors in patients treated with PAMT or PTET in our hospital between June 2015 and November 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The gross total resection (GTR) rate, operation time, estimated blood loss, postoperative hospital stay (PHS), postoperative neurological function, and spinal stability were compared between the 2 surgical methods. Neurological improvement was assessed using the pain visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score. Results Fifteen cases of GTR (93.8%) and 1 case of subtotal resection were included in the PTET group, whilst all 18 patients in the PAMT group achieved GTR. There was no significant difference in the GTR rate, operation time, and PHS between the PAMT and PTET groups. The estimated blood loss was significantly lower in the PTET group than in the PAMT group. At the last follow-up, there was no significant difference in the VAS or JOA scores between PTET and PAMT. No tumor recurrence or spinal instability was observed in either group during the follow-up period. Conclusion Both PAMT and PTET can achieve Eden type III-IV lumbar 1-stage tumor resection without additional spinal internal fixation due to reduced muscle, ligament, and facet joint damage. No lumbar instability and tumor recurrence occurred, and neurological function was improved.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T08:25:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ac89e7a3a9ac40aaa56da8a5a4f28edf
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2586-6583
2586-6591
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T08:25:44Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Korean Spinal Neurosurgery Society
record_format Article
series Neurospine
spelling doaj.art-ac89e7a3a9ac40aaa56da8a5a4f28edf2024-02-02T04:45:26ZengKorean Spinal Neurosurgery SocietyNeurospine2586-65832586-65912022-09-0119351352310.14245/ns.2244152.0761271Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy of Transforaminal Endoscopy and Microtubular Technology for the Treatment of Lumbar Dumbbell-Shaped TumorsRui Wang0Ze Yan Liang1Yan Chen2Chun Mei Chen3 Department of Neurosurgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China Department of Neurosurgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China Department of Neurosurgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China Department of Neurosurgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, ChinaObjective To analyze differences in feasibility and efficacy between the paravertebral approach and microtubular tumorectomy (PAMT) or percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic tumorectomy (PTET) for the treatment of lumbar dumbbell-shaped tumors. Methods Clinical data of dumbbell-shaped lumbar tumors in patients treated with PAMT or PTET in our hospital between June 2015 and November 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The gross total resection (GTR) rate, operation time, estimated blood loss, postoperative hospital stay (PHS), postoperative neurological function, and spinal stability were compared between the 2 surgical methods. Neurological improvement was assessed using the pain visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score. Results Fifteen cases of GTR (93.8%) and 1 case of subtotal resection were included in the PTET group, whilst all 18 patients in the PAMT group achieved GTR. There was no significant difference in the GTR rate, operation time, and PHS between the PAMT and PTET groups. The estimated blood loss was significantly lower in the PTET group than in the PAMT group. At the last follow-up, there was no significant difference in the VAS or JOA scores between PTET and PAMT. No tumor recurrence or spinal instability was observed in either group during the follow-up period. Conclusion Both PAMT and PTET can achieve Eden type III-IV lumbar 1-stage tumor resection without additional spinal internal fixation due to reduced muscle, ligament, and facet joint damage. No lumbar instability and tumor recurrence occurred, and neurological function was improved.http://e-neurospine.org/upload/pdf/ns-2244152-076.pdflumbar spinedumbbell-shaped tumoreden grademicrotubular techniquespinal endoscopygross total resection
spellingShingle Rui Wang
Ze Yan Liang
Yan Chen
Chun Mei Chen
Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy of Transforaminal Endoscopy and Microtubular Technology for the Treatment of Lumbar Dumbbell-Shaped Tumors
Neurospine
lumbar spine
dumbbell-shaped tumor
eden grade
microtubular technique
spinal endoscopy
gross total resection
title Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy of Transforaminal Endoscopy and Microtubular Technology for the Treatment of Lumbar Dumbbell-Shaped Tumors
title_full Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy of Transforaminal Endoscopy and Microtubular Technology for the Treatment of Lumbar Dumbbell-Shaped Tumors
title_fullStr Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy of Transforaminal Endoscopy and Microtubular Technology for the Treatment of Lumbar Dumbbell-Shaped Tumors
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy of Transforaminal Endoscopy and Microtubular Technology for the Treatment of Lumbar Dumbbell-Shaped Tumors
title_short Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy of Transforaminal Endoscopy and Microtubular Technology for the Treatment of Lumbar Dumbbell-Shaped Tumors
title_sort comparison of the clinical efficacy of transforaminal endoscopy and microtubular technology for the treatment of lumbar dumbbell shaped tumors
topic lumbar spine
dumbbell-shaped tumor
eden grade
microtubular technique
spinal endoscopy
gross total resection
url http://e-neurospine.org/upload/pdf/ns-2244152-076.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT ruiwang comparisonoftheclinicalefficacyoftransforaminalendoscopyandmicrotubulartechnologyforthetreatmentoflumbardumbbellshapedtumors
AT zeyanliang comparisonoftheclinicalefficacyoftransforaminalendoscopyandmicrotubulartechnologyforthetreatmentoflumbardumbbellshapedtumors
AT yanchen comparisonoftheclinicalefficacyoftransforaminalendoscopyandmicrotubulartechnologyforthetreatmentoflumbardumbbellshapedtumors
AT chunmeichen comparisonoftheclinicalefficacyoftransforaminalendoscopyandmicrotubulartechnologyforthetreatmentoflumbardumbbellshapedtumors