The Complex Vertical Motion of Intraplate Oceanic Islands Assessed in Santiago Island, Cape Verde

Abstract Dated paleosea level markers and eustatic sea level changes are necessary but not sufficient information to calculate vertical motion rates on oceanic islands. Therefore, we use a procedure in which we work progressively back in time to incorporate the more recent vertical motion rates impl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: F. O. Marques, A. Hildenbrand, H. Zeyen, C. Cunha, S. S. Victória
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-03-01
Series:Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GC008754
_version_ 1797638103291133952
author F. O. Marques
A. Hildenbrand
H. Zeyen
C. Cunha
S. S. Victória
author_facet F. O. Marques
A. Hildenbrand
H. Zeyen
C. Cunha
S. S. Victória
author_sort F. O. Marques
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Dated paleosea level markers and eustatic sea level changes are necessary but not sufficient information to calculate vertical motion rates on oceanic islands. Therefore, we use a procedure in which we work progressively back in time to incorporate the more recent vertical motion rates implied by the youngest paleoshorelines into the vertical motion history of all older shorelines. Specifically, we calculate the time‐averaged vertical motion rates required to explain the present‐day elevations of the dated sequence of paleoshorelines on Santiago volcanic island (Cape Verde). We thus obtain a vertical motion history consisting of time‐averaged vertical motion rates spanning the five intervening periods between paleoshoreline formation and the present day: (1) 5.06 to 3.29 Ma—seamount growth or island subsidence because all the rocks in this period are submarine; (2) fast uplift (approximately 0.96 mm/a) from 3.29 to 2.87 Ma, mostly responsible for putting submarine lavas currently close to 410 m altitude; (3) relatively fast subsidence (approximately −0.11 mm/a) between 2.87 and 2.18 Ma; (4) stagnation from 2.18 to 0.811 Ma; and (5) relatively fast uplift (approximately 0.14 mm/a) between 0.811 and 0 Ma. We numerically tested top‐down (volcanic loading) and bottom‐up (lithosphere thinning, underplating, and mantle plume) mechanisms to explain the inferred vertical movements, and we conclude that volcanic loading and crustal underplating are capable of producing the observed subsidence and uplift, respectively.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T12:58:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ac8e3965d30748ea95cadc3892ba5303
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1525-2027
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T12:58:48Z
publishDate 2020-03-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
spelling doaj.art-ac8e3965d30748ea95cadc3892ba53032023-11-03T16:55:58ZengWileyGeochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems1525-20272020-03-01213n/an/a10.1029/2019GC008754The Complex Vertical Motion of Intraplate Oceanic Islands Assessed in Santiago Island, Cape VerdeF. O. Marques0A. Hildenbrand1H. Zeyen2C. Cunha3S. S. Victória4Departamento de Geologia Universidade de Lisboa Lisboa PortugalUniversité Paris‐Saclay, CNRS, GEOPS Orsay FranceUniversité Paris‐Saclay, CNRS, GEOPS Orsay FranceEscola Superior Agrária Instituto Politécnico de Coimbra Coimbra PortugalFaculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia Universidade de Cabo Verde Praia Cape VerdeAbstract Dated paleosea level markers and eustatic sea level changes are necessary but not sufficient information to calculate vertical motion rates on oceanic islands. Therefore, we use a procedure in which we work progressively back in time to incorporate the more recent vertical motion rates implied by the youngest paleoshorelines into the vertical motion history of all older shorelines. Specifically, we calculate the time‐averaged vertical motion rates required to explain the present‐day elevations of the dated sequence of paleoshorelines on Santiago volcanic island (Cape Verde). We thus obtain a vertical motion history consisting of time‐averaged vertical motion rates spanning the five intervening periods between paleoshoreline formation and the present day: (1) 5.06 to 3.29 Ma—seamount growth or island subsidence because all the rocks in this period are submarine; (2) fast uplift (approximately 0.96 mm/a) from 3.29 to 2.87 Ma, mostly responsible for putting submarine lavas currently close to 410 m altitude; (3) relatively fast subsidence (approximately −0.11 mm/a) between 2.87 and 2.18 Ma; (4) stagnation from 2.18 to 0.811 Ma; and (5) relatively fast uplift (approximately 0.14 mm/a) between 0.811 and 0 Ma. We numerically tested top‐down (volcanic loading) and bottom‐up (lithosphere thinning, underplating, and mantle plume) mechanisms to explain the inferred vertical movements, and we conclude that volcanic loading and crustal underplating are capable of producing the observed subsidence and uplift, respectively.https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GC008754uplift and subsidence rates of oceanic islandsvertical displacement in Santiago Island, Cape Verdesea level changespaleoshorelinespassage zonestopography response to isostasy
spellingShingle F. O. Marques
A. Hildenbrand
H. Zeyen
C. Cunha
S. S. Victória
The Complex Vertical Motion of Intraplate Oceanic Islands Assessed in Santiago Island, Cape Verde
Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
uplift and subsidence rates of oceanic islands
vertical displacement in Santiago Island, Cape Verde
sea level changes
paleoshorelines
passage zones
topography response to isostasy
title The Complex Vertical Motion of Intraplate Oceanic Islands Assessed in Santiago Island, Cape Verde
title_full The Complex Vertical Motion of Intraplate Oceanic Islands Assessed in Santiago Island, Cape Verde
title_fullStr The Complex Vertical Motion of Intraplate Oceanic Islands Assessed in Santiago Island, Cape Verde
title_full_unstemmed The Complex Vertical Motion of Intraplate Oceanic Islands Assessed in Santiago Island, Cape Verde
title_short The Complex Vertical Motion of Intraplate Oceanic Islands Assessed in Santiago Island, Cape Verde
title_sort complex vertical motion of intraplate oceanic islands assessed in santiago island cape verde
topic uplift and subsidence rates of oceanic islands
vertical displacement in Santiago Island, Cape Verde
sea level changes
paleoshorelines
passage zones
topography response to isostasy
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GC008754
work_keys_str_mv AT fomarques thecomplexverticalmotionofintraplateoceanicislandsassessedinsantiagoislandcapeverde
AT ahildenbrand thecomplexverticalmotionofintraplateoceanicislandsassessedinsantiagoislandcapeverde
AT hzeyen thecomplexverticalmotionofintraplateoceanicislandsassessedinsantiagoislandcapeverde
AT ccunha thecomplexverticalmotionofintraplateoceanicislandsassessedinsantiagoislandcapeverde
AT ssvictoria thecomplexverticalmotionofintraplateoceanicislandsassessedinsantiagoislandcapeverde
AT fomarques complexverticalmotionofintraplateoceanicislandsassessedinsantiagoislandcapeverde
AT ahildenbrand complexverticalmotionofintraplateoceanicislandsassessedinsantiagoislandcapeverde
AT hzeyen complexverticalmotionofintraplateoceanicislandsassessedinsantiagoislandcapeverde
AT ccunha complexverticalmotionofintraplateoceanicislandsassessedinsantiagoislandcapeverde
AT ssvictoria complexverticalmotionofintraplateoceanicislandsassessedinsantiagoislandcapeverde