Lexicalised Locality: Local Domains and Non-Local Dependencies in a Lexicalised Tree Adjoining Grammar
Contemporary generative grammar assumes that syntactic structure is best described in terms of sets, and that locality conditions, as well as cross-linguistic variation, is determined at the level of designated functional heads. Syntactic operations (merge, MERGE, etc.) build a structure by deriving...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-08-01
|
Series: | Philosophies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2409-9287/6/3/70 |
_version_ | 1827295313290854400 |
---|---|
author | Diego Gabriel Krivochen Andrea Padovan |
author_facet | Diego Gabriel Krivochen Andrea Padovan |
author_sort | Diego Gabriel Krivochen |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Contemporary generative grammar assumes that syntactic structure is best described in terms of sets, and that locality conditions, as well as cross-linguistic variation, is determined at the level of designated functional heads. Syntactic operations (merge, MERGE, etc.) build a structure by deriving sets from lexical atoms and recursively (and monotonically) yielding sets of sets. Additional restrictions over the format of structural descriptions limit the number of elements involved in each operation to two at each derivational step, a head and a non-head. In this paper, we will explore an alternative direction for minimalist inquiry based on previous work, e.g., Frank (2002, 2006), albeit under novel assumptions. We propose a view of syntactic structure as a specification of relations in graphs, which correspond to the extended projection of lexical heads; these are <i>elementary trees</i> in Tree Adjoining Grammars. We present empirical motivation for a lexicalised approach to structure building, where the units of the grammar are elementary trees. Our proposal will be based on cross-linguistic evidence; we will consider the structure of elementary trees in Spanish, English and German. We will also explore the consequences of assuming that nodes in elementary trees are addresses for purposes of tree composition operations, substitution and adjunction. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-10T07:18:33Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-ac90ed0e28934e55897674dd4d624454 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2409-9287 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-24T14:17:27Z |
publishDate | 2021-08-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Philosophies |
spelling | doaj.art-ac90ed0e28934e55897674dd4d6244542024-04-03T08:22:20ZengMDPI AGPhilosophies2409-92872021-08-01637010.3390/philosophies6030070Lexicalised Locality: Local Domains and Non-Local Dependencies in a Lexicalised Tree Adjoining GrammarDiego Gabriel Krivochen0Andrea Padovan1Dipartimento di Culture e Civiltà, Università di Verona, 37129 Verona, ItalyDipartimento di Lingue e Letterature Straniere, Università di Verona, 37129 Verona, ItalyContemporary generative grammar assumes that syntactic structure is best described in terms of sets, and that locality conditions, as well as cross-linguistic variation, is determined at the level of designated functional heads. Syntactic operations (merge, MERGE, etc.) build a structure by deriving sets from lexical atoms and recursively (and monotonically) yielding sets of sets. Additional restrictions over the format of structural descriptions limit the number of elements involved in each operation to two at each derivational step, a head and a non-head. In this paper, we will explore an alternative direction for minimalist inquiry based on previous work, e.g., Frank (2002, 2006), albeit under novel assumptions. We propose a view of syntactic structure as a specification of relations in graphs, which correspond to the extended projection of lexical heads; these are <i>elementary trees</i> in Tree Adjoining Grammars. We present empirical motivation for a lexicalised approach to structure building, where the units of the grammar are elementary trees. Our proposal will be based on cross-linguistic evidence; we will consider the structure of elementary trees in Spanish, English and German. We will also explore the consequences of assuming that nodes in elementary trees are addresses for purposes of tree composition operations, substitution and adjunction.https://www.mdpi.com/2409-9287/6/3/70localitytree adjoining grammarlexicalised grammartree composition |
spellingShingle | Diego Gabriel Krivochen Andrea Padovan Lexicalised Locality: Local Domains and Non-Local Dependencies in a Lexicalised Tree Adjoining Grammar Philosophies locality tree adjoining grammar lexicalised grammar tree composition |
title | Lexicalised Locality: Local Domains and Non-Local Dependencies in a Lexicalised Tree Adjoining Grammar |
title_full | Lexicalised Locality: Local Domains and Non-Local Dependencies in a Lexicalised Tree Adjoining Grammar |
title_fullStr | Lexicalised Locality: Local Domains and Non-Local Dependencies in a Lexicalised Tree Adjoining Grammar |
title_full_unstemmed | Lexicalised Locality: Local Domains and Non-Local Dependencies in a Lexicalised Tree Adjoining Grammar |
title_short | Lexicalised Locality: Local Domains and Non-Local Dependencies in a Lexicalised Tree Adjoining Grammar |
title_sort | lexicalised locality local domains and non local dependencies in a lexicalised tree adjoining grammar |
topic | locality tree adjoining grammar lexicalised grammar tree composition |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2409-9287/6/3/70 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT diegogabrielkrivochen lexicalisedlocalitylocaldomainsandnonlocaldependenciesinalexicalisedtreeadjoininggrammar AT andreapadovan lexicalisedlocalitylocaldomainsandnonlocaldependenciesinalexicalisedtreeadjoininggrammar |