Lexicalised Locality: Local Domains and Non-Local Dependencies in a Lexicalised Tree Adjoining Grammar

Contemporary generative grammar assumes that syntactic structure is best described in terms of sets, and that locality conditions, as well as cross-linguistic variation, is determined at the level of designated functional heads. Syntactic operations (merge, MERGE, etc.) build a structure by deriving...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Diego Gabriel Krivochen, Andrea Padovan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-08-01
Series:Philosophies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2409-9287/6/3/70
_version_ 1827295313290854400
author Diego Gabriel Krivochen
Andrea Padovan
author_facet Diego Gabriel Krivochen
Andrea Padovan
author_sort Diego Gabriel Krivochen
collection DOAJ
description Contemporary generative grammar assumes that syntactic structure is best described in terms of sets, and that locality conditions, as well as cross-linguistic variation, is determined at the level of designated functional heads. Syntactic operations (merge, MERGE, etc.) build a structure by deriving sets from lexical atoms and recursively (and monotonically) yielding sets of sets. Additional restrictions over the format of structural descriptions limit the number of elements involved in each operation to two at each derivational step, a head and a non-head. In this paper, we will explore an alternative direction for minimalist inquiry based on previous work, e.g., Frank (2002, 2006), albeit under novel assumptions. We propose a view of syntactic structure as a specification of relations in graphs, which correspond to the extended projection of lexical heads; these are <i>elementary trees</i> in Tree Adjoining Grammars. We present empirical motivation for a lexicalised approach to structure building, where the units of the grammar are elementary trees. Our proposal will be based on cross-linguistic evidence; we will consider the structure of elementary trees in Spanish, English and German. We will also explore the consequences of assuming that nodes in elementary trees are addresses for purposes of tree composition operations, substitution and adjunction.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T07:18:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ac90ed0e28934e55897674dd4d624454
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2409-9287
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T14:17:27Z
publishDate 2021-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Philosophies
spelling doaj.art-ac90ed0e28934e55897674dd4d6244542024-04-03T08:22:20ZengMDPI AGPhilosophies2409-92872021-08-01637010.3390/philosophies6030070Lexicalised Locality: Local Domains and Non-Local Dependencies in a Lexicalised Tree Adjoining GrammarDiego Gabriel Krivochen0Andrea Padovan1Dipartimento di Culture e Civiltà, Università di Verona, 37129 Verona, ItalyDipartimento di Lingue e Letterature Straniere, Università di Verona, 37129 Verona, ItalyContemporary generative grammar assumes that syntactic structure is best described in terms of sets, and that locality conditions, as well as cross-linguistic variation, is determined at the level of designated functional heads. Syntactic operations (merge, MERGE, etc.) build a structure by deriving sets from lexical atoms and recursively (and monotonically) yielding sets of sets. Additional restrictions over the format of structural descriptions limit the number of elements involved in each operation to two at each derivational step, a head and a non-head. In this paper, we will explore an alternative direction for minimalist inquiry based on previous work, e.g., Frank (2002, 2006), albeit under novel assumptions. We propose a view of syntactic structure as a specification of relations in graphs, which correspond to the extended projection of lexical heads; these are <i>elementary trees</i> in Tree Adjoining Grammars. We present empirical motivation for a lexicalised approach to structure building, where the units of the grammar are elementary trees. Our proposal will be based on cross-linguistic evidence; we will consider the structure of elementary trees in Spanish, English and German. We will also explore the consequences of assuming that nodes in elementary trees are addresses for purposes of tree composition operations, substitution and adjunction.https://www.mdpi.com/2409-9287/6/3/70localitytree adjoining grammarlexicalised grammartree composition
spellingShingle Diego Gabriel Krivochen
Andrea Padovan
Lexicalised Locality: Local Domains and Non-Local Dependencies in a Lexicalised Tree Adjoining Grammar
Philosophies
locality
tree adjoining grammar
lexicalised grammar
tree composition
title Lexicalised Locality: Local Domains and Non-Local Dependencies in a Lexicalised Tree Adjoining Grammar
title_full Lexicalised Locality: Local Domains and Non-Local Dependencies in a Lexicalised Tree Adjoining Grammar
title_fullStr Lexicalised Locality: Local Domains and Non-Local Dependencies in a Lexicalised Tree Adjoining Grammar
title_full_unstemmed Lexicalised Locality: Local Domains and Non-Local Dependencies in a Lexicalised Tree Adjoining Grammar
title_short Lexicalised Locality: Local Domains and Non-Local Dependencies in a Lexicalised Tree Adjoining Grammar
title_sort lexicalised locality local domains and non local dependencies in a lexicalised tree adjoining grammar
topic locality
tree adjoining grammar
lexicalised grammar
tree composition
url https://www.mdpi.com/2409-9287/6/3/70
work_keys_str_mv AT diegogabrielkrivochen lexicalisedlocalitylocaldomainsandnonlocaldependenciesinalexicalisedtreeadjoininggrammar
AT andreapadovan lexicalisedlocalitylocaldomainsandnonlocaldependenciesinalexicalisedtreeadjoininggrammar