Tolerant, Growing Cells from Nutrient Shifts Are Not Persister Cells

ABSTRACT There is much controversy about the metabolic state of cells that are tolerant to antibiotics, known as persister cells. In this opinion piece, we offer an explanation for the discrepancy seen: some laboratories are studying metabolically active and growing cell populations (e.g., as a resu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jun-Seob Kim, Thomas K. Wood
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Society for Microbiology 2017-05-01
Series:mBio
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/mBio.00354-17
_version_ 1818739498274521088
author Jun-Seob Kim
Thomas K. Wood
author_facet Jun-Seob Kim
Thomas K. Wood
author_sort Jun-Seob Kim
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT There is much controversy about the metabolic state of cells that are tolerant to antibiotics, known as persister cells. In this opinion piece, we offer an explanation for the discrepancy seen: some laboratories are studying metabolically active and growing cell populations (e.g., as a result of nutrient shifts) and attributing the phenotypes that they discern to persister cells while other labs are studying dormant cells. We argue here that the metabolically active cell population should more accurately be considered tolerant cells, while the dormant cells are the true persister population.
first_indexed 2024-12-18T01:25:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ac9658f524614a788ce887251bff024c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2150-7511
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T01:25:47Z
publishDate 2017-05-01
publisher American Society for Microbiology
record_format Article
series mBio
spelling doaj.art-ac9658f524614a788ce887251bff024c2022-12-21T21:25:44ZengAmerican Society for MicrobiologymBio2150-75112017-05-018210.1128/mBio.00354-17Tolerant, Growing Cells from Nutrient Shifts Are Not Persister CellsJun-Seob Kim0Thomas K. Wood1Department of Chemical Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USADepartment of Chemical Engineering, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USAABSTRACT There is much controversy about the metabolic state of cells that are tolerant to antibiotics, known as persister cells. In this opinion piece, we offer an explanation for the discrepancy seen: some laboratories are studying metabolically active and growing cell populations (e.g., as a result of nutrient shifts) and attributing the phenotypes that they discern to persister cells while other labs are studying dormant cells. We argue here that the metabolically active cell population should more accurately be considered tolerant cells, while the dormant cells are the true persister population.https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/mBio.00354-17antimicrobial agentspersistencetolerance
spellingShingle Jun-Seob Kim
Thomas K. Wood
Tolerant, Growing Cells from Nutrient Shifts Are Not Persister Cells
mBio
antimicrobial agents
persistence
tolerance
title Tolerant, Growing Cells from Nutrient Shifts Are Not Persister Cells
title_full Tolerant, Growing Cells from Nutrient Shifts Are Not Persister Cells
title_fullStr Tolerant, Growing Cells from Nutrient Shifts Are Not Persister Cells
title_full_unstemmed Tolerant, Growing Cells from Nutrient Shifts Are Not Persister Cells
title_short Tolerant, Growing Cells from Nutrient Shifts Are Not Persister Cells
title_sort tolerant growing cells from nutrient shifts are not persister cells
topic antimicrobial agents
persistence
tolerance
url https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/mBio.00354-17
work_keys_str_mv AT junseobkim tolerantgrowingcellsfromnutrientshiftsarenotpersistercells
AT thomaskwood tolerantgrowingcellsfromnutrientshiftsarenotpersistercells