In-Session Reflective Functioning: Relationship With the Presence and Depth of Work on Conflict or Personality Functioning

Mentalizing, conceived as the capacity to attribute intentional mental states as implicit or underlying behavior of an individual or others, has gained interest within psychodynamic clinical research due to its potential as a change mechanism. Variations and qualities of mentalization have been stud...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cecilia de la Cerda, Paula Dagnino
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.725739/full
_version_ 1818672161406058496
author Cecilia de la Cerda
Cecilia de la Cerda
Cecilia de la Cerda
Paula Dagnino
Paula Dagnino
Paula Dagnino
author_facet Cecilia de la Cerda
Cecilia de la Cerda
Cecilia de la Cerda
Paula Dagnino
Paula Dagnino
Paula Dagnino
author_sort Cecilia de la Cerda
collection DOAJ
description Mentalizing, conceived as the capacity to attribute intentional mental states as implicit or underlying behavior of an individual or others, has gained interest within psychodynamic clinical research due to its potential as a change mechanism. Variations and qualities of mentalization have been studied through reflective functioning (RF). But only few studies are analyzing it throughout the psychotherapeutic interaction, identifying its level for therapists and patients. In contrast, brief psychodynamic therapy has a long tradition for establishing a focus to be worked upon. Lately, a multischematic focus has arisen, considering both conflict and personality functioning focuses as key elements on successful psychotherapies. This study aimed to identify mentalizing manifestations of patients and therapists through change episodes of one successful brief psychodynamic therapy and establish the relationship between these mentalizing manifestations and the type and depth of the therapeutic focus being worked on (conflict or personality functioning). Only 37.5% of speaking turns were able to be coded with RF; 77% of these had moderate to high RF and 22% had low or failure RF. The patient had 91% of low or failure RF, while the therapist only had 9% of low or failure RF. As for moderate to high RF, patients had 39%, while therapists had 61%. The patient showed a similar number of low or failure RF interventions and moderate to high RF interventions in conflict episodes. Meanwhile, the therapist only performs moderate to high-level RF interventions. In episodes in which personality functioning is worked on, both patient and therapist show a greater presence of interventions of moderate to high levels of RF. Finally, mentalizing interactions and non-mentalizing interactions were found on segments with conflict, and only mentalizing interactions were found on personality functioning segments.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T07:35:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-acae864cb91d4a4fb059e4624bfd8d51
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T07:35:30Z
publishDate 2021-09-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-acae864cb91d4a4fb059e4624bfd8d512022-12-21T21:58:21ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782021-09-011210.3389/fpsyg.2021.725739725739In-Session Reflective Functioning: Relationship With the Presence and Depth of Work on Conflict or Personality FunctioningCecilia de la Cerda0Cecilia de la Cerda1Cecilia de la Cerda2Paula Dagnino3Paula Dagnino4Paula Dagnino5Faculty of Social Science, Department of Mediations and Subjectivities, Universidad de Playa Ancha, Valparaíso, ChileMillennium Institute for Research on Depression and Personality, Santiago, ChileCenter for the Research on Psychotherapy – CIPSI, Santiago, ChileMillennium Institute for Research on Depression and Personality, Santiago, ChileCenter for the Research on Psychotherapy – CIPSI, Santiago, ChileFaculty of Psychology, Universidad San Sebastian, Santiago, ChileMentalizing, conceived as the capacity to attribute intentional mental states as implicit or underlying behavior of an individual or others, has gained interest within psychodynamic clinical research due to its potential as a change mechanism. Variations and qualities of mentalization have been studied through reflective functioning (RF). But only few studies are analyzing it throughout the psychotherapeutic interaction, identifying its level for therapists and patients. In contrast, brief psychodynamic therapy has a long tradition for establishing a focus to be worked upon. Lately, a multischematic focus has arisen, considering both conflict and personality functioning focuses as key elements on successful psychotherapies. This study aimed to identify mentalizing manifestations of patients and therapists through change episodes of one successful brief psychodynamic therapy and establish the relationship between these mentalizing manifestations and the type and depth of the therapeutic focus being worked on (conflict or personality functioning). Only 37.5% of speaking turns were able to be coded with RF; 77% of these had moderate to high RF and 22% had low or failure RF. The patient had 91% of low or failure RF, while the therapist only had 9% of low or failure RF. As for moderate to high RF, patients had 39%, while therapists had 61%. The patient showed a similar number of low or failure RF interventions and moderate to high RF interventions in conflict episodes. Meanwhile, the therapist only performs moderate to high-level RF interventions. In episodes in which personality functioning is worked on, both patient and therapist show a greater presence of interventions of moderate to high levels of RF. Finally, mentalizing interactions and non-mentalizing interactions were found on segments with conflict, and only mentalizing interactions were found on personality functioning segments.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.725739/fullsingle casetherapeutic focusreflective functioningpsychotherapy processepisodes of change
spellingShingle Cecilia de la Cerda
Cecilia de la Cerda
Cecilia de la Cerda
Paula Dagnino
Paula Dagnino
Paula Dagnino
In-Session Reflective Functioning: Relationship With the Presence and Depth of Work on Conflict or Personality Functioning
Frontiers in Psychology
single case
therapeutic focus
reflective functioning
psychotherapy process
episodes of change
title In-Session Reflective Functioning: Relationship With the Presence and Depth of Work on Conflict or Personality Functioning
title_full In-Session Reflective Functioning: Relationship With the Presence and Depth of Work on Conflict or Personality Functioning
title_fullStr In-Session Reflective Functioning: Relationship With the Presence and Depth of Work on Conflict or Personality Functioning
title_full_unstemmed In-Session Reflective Functioning: Relationship With the Presence and Depth of Work on Conflict or Personality Functioning
title_short In-Session Reflective Functioning: Relationship With the Presence and Depth of Work on Conflict or Personality Functioning
title_sort in session reflective functioning relationship with the presence and depth of work on conflict or personality functioning
topic single case
therapeutic focus
reflective functioning
psychotherapy process
episodes of change
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.725739/full
work_keys_str_mv AT ceciliadelacerda insessionreflectivefunctioningrelationshipwiththepresenceanddepthofworkonconflictorpersonalityfunctioning
AT ceciliadelacerda insessionreflectivefunctioningrelationshipwiththepresenceanddepthofworkonconflictorpersonalityfunctioning
AT ceciliadelacerda insessionreflectivefunctioningrelationshipwiththepresenceanddepthofworkonconflictorpersonalityfunctioning
AT pauladagnino insessionreflectivefunctioningrelationshipwiththepresenceanddepthofworkonconflictorpersonalityfunctioning
AT pauladagnino insessionreflectivefunctioningrelationshipwiththepresenceanddepthofworkonconflictorpersonalityfunctioning
AT pauladagnino insessionreflectivefunctioningrelationshipwiththepresenceanddepthofworkonconflictorpersonalityfunctioning