Islam in a More Conservative Western World

My findings are tentative and subject to further research. This presentation rests on three paradoxes of great relevance to Muslims in the West. The first paradox is that, from the point of views of Muslims in the West, western secularism might be good news and western materialism might be bad news....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ali A. Mazrui
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: International Institute of Islamic Thought 1996-07-01
Series:American Journal of Islam and Society
Online Access:https://www.ajis.org/index.php/ajiss/article/view/2317
_version_ 1818905295890415616
author Ali A. Mazrui
author_facet Ali A. Mazrui
author_sort Ali A. Mazrui
collection DOAJ
description My findings are tentative and subject to further research. This presentation rests on three paradoxes of great relevance to Muslims in the West. The first paradox is that, from the point of views of Muslims in the West, western secularism might be good news and western materialism might be bad news. In other words, western secularism is perhaps a blessing in disguise for Muslims, whereas western materialism is a curse. The second paradox is that recent Republican, rather than Democratic, foreign policy has been more friendly to Muslims, wherea Democratic, rather then Republican, domestic policies are probably more friendly to Muslims. The third paradox concerns the two Islams in the United States: indigenou and immigrant. In the United States, western secularism has protected minority religious groups by insisting on the separation of church and state. This is as major reason why American Jews have been among the greatest defenders of the separation of church and state, for any breach could lead to the imposition of some practices of the religious majority, such as forcing Jewish children to participate in Christian prayers at school. The secular state permits religious minorities to practice their religions in relative peace. Of course, like all doctrines, secularism has its fanatic who sometimes want to degrade, rather than protect, the sacred. But at its best, a secular state is a refuge of safety for minority religions. It is in this sense that western secularism is a friend of Muslims living in the West. But while secularism represents a divorce from formal religion, materialism is a dilution of spirituality. One can be without a formal religion and still be deeply spiritual in a humanistic sense. John Stuart Mill and Bertrand Russell, for example, had no formal religion, yet each had deeply spiritual values. Albert Schweitzer, the Nobel Laureate for Peace and an eventual agnostic, remained deeply committed to the principle of reverence for life, even to the extent of protecting the lives of insects in Africa ...
first_indexed 2024-12-19T21:21:04Z
format Article
id doaj.art-acaeb4718f6c4cf7a63c2c4f1342c418
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2690-3733
2690-3741
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T21:21:04Z
publishDate 1996-07-01
publisher International Institute of Islamic Thought
record_format Article
series American Journal of Islam and Society
spelling doaj.art-acaeb4718f6c4cf7a63c2c4f1342c4182022-12-21T20:05:14ZengInternational Institute of Islamic ThoughtAmerican Journal of Islam and Society2690-37332690-37411996-07-0113210.35632/ajis.v13i2.2317Islam in a More Conservative Western WorldAli A. MazruiMy findings are tentative and subject to further research. This presentation rests on three paradoxes of great relevance to Muslims in the West. The first paradox is that, from the point of views of Muslims in the West, western secularism might be good news and western materialism might be bad news. In other words, western secularism is perhaps a blessing in disguise for Muslims, whereas western materialism is a curse. The second paradox is that recent Republican, rather than Democratic, foreign policy has been more friendly to Muslims, wherea Democratic, rather then Republican, domestic policies are probably more friendly to Muslims. The third paradox concerns the two Islams in the United States: indigenou and immigrant. In the United States, western secularism has protected minority religious groups by insisting on the separation of church and state. This is as major reason why American Jews have been among the greatest defenders of the separation of church and state, for any breach could lead to the imposition of some practices of the religious majority, such as forcing Jewish children to participate in Christian prayers at school. The secular state permits religious minorities to practice their religions in relative peace. Of course, like all doctrines, secularism has its fanatic who sometimes want to degrade, rather than protect, the sacred. But at its best, a secular state is a refuge of safety for minority religions. It is in this sense that western secularism is a friend of Muslims living in the West. But while secularism represents a divorce from formal religion, materialism is a dilution of spirituality. One can be without a formal religion and still be deeply spiritual in a humanistic sense. John Stuart Mill and Bertrand Russell, for example, had no formal religion, yet each had deeply spiritual values. Albert Schweitzer, the Nobel Laureate for Peace and an eventual agnostic, remained deeply committed to the principle of reverence for life, even to the extent of protecting the lives of insects in Africa ...https://www.ajis.org/index.php/ajiss/article/view/2317
spellingShingle Ali A. Mazrui
Islam in a More Conservative Western World
American Journal of Islam and Society
title Islam in a More Conservative Western World
title_full Islam in a More Conservative Western World
title_fullStr Islam in a More Conservative Western World
title_full_unstemmed Islam in a More Conservative Western World
title_short Islam in a More Conservative Western World
title_sort islam in a more conservative western world
url https://www.ajis.org/index.php/ajiss/article/view/2317
work_keys_str_mv AT aliamazrui islaminamoreconservativewesternworld