The Conceptualization of Space: Places in Signed Language Discourse

We examine the conceptualization of space in signed language discourse within the theory of cognitive grammar. Adopting a Places view, we define Place as a symbolic structure that associates a schematic semantic pole and a schematic phonological pole. Places acquire full contextual meaning and a spe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sherman Wilcox, Rocío Martínez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01406/full
_version_ 1818130836910768128
author Sherman Wilcox
Rocío Martínez
author_facet Sherman Wilcox
Rocío Martínez
author_sort Sherman Wilcox
collection DOAJ
description We examine the conceptualization of space in signed language discourse within the theory of cognitive grammar. Adopting a Places view, we define Place as a symbolic structure that associates a schematic semantic pole and a schematic phonological pole. Places acquire full contextual meaning and a specific spatial location in the context of a usage event. In the present article, we analyze the referential function of Places in different grammatical constructions throughout a selection of videos produced by deaf Argentine Sign Language signers. Our analysis examines Places, which are associated with entities in the surrounding spatial environment as well as Places that are created or recruited in discourse without reference to surrounding physical entities. We observe that Places are used in pointing, placing, and other grammatical constructions in order to introduce and track referents in ongoing discourse. We also examine the use of conceptual reference points, by which Places afford mental access to new related concepts that are the intended focus of attention. These results allow us to discuss three related issues. First, for signed language discourse, space is both semantically and phonologically loaded. Signers’ semantic and phonological choices for Place symbolic structures are motivated by embodied experience and the abstraction of usage events. Second, Places occur along a continuum from deixis to anaphor, united by the same conceptual system and differing in extent of phonological subjectification. Third, we suggest developmental implications of our Place analysis.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T08:11:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-acdbe7a3f1e44765adb997526936a7ca
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T08:11:23Z
publishDate 2020-07-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-acdbe7a3f1e44765adb997526936a7ca2022-12-22T01:14:53ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782020-07-011110.3389/fpsyg.2020.01406535539The Conceptualization of Space: Places in Signed Language DiscourseSherman Wilcox0Rocío Martínez1Department of Linguistics, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United StatesInstituto de Lingüística, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad de Buenos Aires and Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, ArgentinaWe examine the conceptualization of space in signed language discourse within the theory of cognitive grammar. Adopting a Places view, we define Place as a symbolic structure that associates a schematic semantic pole and a schematic phonological pole. Places acquire full contextual meaning and a specific spatial location in the context of a usage event. In the present article, we analyze the referential function of Places in different grammatical constructions throughout a selection of videos produced by deaf Argentine Sign Language signers. Our analysis examines Places, which are associated with entities in the surrounding spatial environment as well as Places that are created or recruited in discourse without reference to surrounding physical entities. We observe that Places are used in pointing, placing, and other grammatical constructions in order to introduce and track referents in ongoing discourse. We also examine the use of conceptual reference points, by which Places afford mental access to new related concepts that are the intended focus of attention. These results allow us to discuss three related issues. First, for signed language discourse, space is both semantically and phonologically loaded. Signers’ semantic and phonological choices for Place symbolic structures are motivated by embodied experience and the abstraction of usage events. Second, Places occur along a continuum from deixis to anaphor, united by the same conceptual system and differing in extent of phonological subjectification. Third, we suggest developmental implications of our Place analysis.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01406/fullsigned languagecognitive grammarpointingreference pointsdeixis
spellingShingle Sherman Wilcox
Rocío Martínez
The Conceptualization of Space: Places in Signed Language Discourse
Frontiers in Psychology
signed language
cognitive grammar
pointing
reference points
deixis
title The Conceptualization of Space: Places in Signed Language Discourse
title_full The Conceptualization of Space: Places in Signed Language Discourse
title_fullStr The Conceptualization of Space: Places in Signed Language Discourse
title_full_unstemmed The Conceptualization of Space: Places in Signed Language Discourse
title_short The Conceptualization of Space: Places in Signed Language Discourse
title_sort conceptualization of space places in signed language discourse
topic signed language
cognitive grammar
pointing
reference points
deixis
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01406/full
work_keys_str_mv AT shermanwilcox theconceptualizationofspaceplacesinsignedlanguagediscourse
AT rociomartinez theconceptualizationofspaceplacesinsignedlanguagediscourse
AT shermanwilcox conceptualizationofspaceplacesinsignedlanguagediscourse
AT rociomartinez conceptualizationofspaceplacesinsignedlanguagediscourse