Estimated Cost Effectiveness of Influenza Vaccination for Emergency Medical Services Professionals

Introduction: Because of their frequent contact with compromised patients, vaccination against influenza is recommended for all healthcare workers. Recent studies suggest that vaccination decreases influenza transmission to patients and reduces worker illness and absenteeism. However, few emergency...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael W. Hubble, Ginny K. Renkiewicz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: eScholarship Publishing, University of California 2021-09-01
Series:Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
Online Access:https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0hn9b7jh
_version_ 1818740264303329280
author Michael W. Hubble
Ginny K. Renkiewicz
author_facet Michael W. Hubble
Ginny K. Renkiewicz
author_sort Michael W. Hubble
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Because of their frequent contact with compromised patients, vaccination against influenza is recommended for all healthcare workers. Recent studies suggest that vaccination decreases influenza transmission to patients and reduces worker illness and absenteeism. However, few emergency medical services (EMS) agencies provide annual vaccination, and the vaccination rate among EMS personnel remains low. Reticence among EMS agencies to provide influenza vaccination to their employees may be due in part to the unknown fiscal consequences of implementing a vaccination program. In this study, we sought to estimate the cost effectiveness of an employer-provided influenza vaccination program for EMS personnel. Methods: Using data from published reports on influenza vaccination, we developed a cost-effectiveness model of vaccination for a hypothesized EMS system of 100 employees. Model inputs included vaccination costs, vaccination rate, infection rate, costs associated with absenteeism, lost productivity due to working while ill (presenteeism), and medical care for treating illness. To assess the robustness of the model we performed a series of sensitivity analyses on the input variables. Results: The proportion of employees contracting influenza or influenza-like illness (ILI) was estimated at 19% among vaccinated employees compared to 26% among non-vaccinated employees. The costs of the vaccine, consumables, and employee time for vaccination totaled $44.19 per vaccinated employee, with a total system cost of $4,419. Compared to no vaccination, a mandatory vaccination program would save $20,745 in lost productivity and medical costs, or $16,325 in net savings after accounting for vaccination costs. The savings were 3.7 times the cost of the vaccination program and were derived from avoided absenteeism ($7,988), avoided presenteeism productivity losses ($10,303), and avoided medical costs of treating employees with influenza/ILI ($2,454). Through sensitivity analyses the model was verified to be robust across a wide range of input variable assumptions. The net monetary benefits were positive across all ranges of input assumptions, but cost savings were most sensitive to the vaccination uptake rate, ILI rate, and presenteeism productivity losses. Conclusion: This cost-effectiveness analysis suggests that an employer-provided influenza vaccination program is a financially favorable strategy for reducing costs associated with influenza/ILI employee absenteeism, presenteeism, and medical care.
first_indexed 2024-12-18T01:37:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ace121aa245c49a5a93aa040b785ea83
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1936-9018
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T01:37:58Z
publishDate 2021-09-01
publisher eScholarship Publishing, University of California
record_format Article
series Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
spelling doaj.art-ace121aa245c49a5a93aa040b785ea832022-12-21T21:25:24ZengeScholarship Publishing, University of CaliforniaWestern Journal of Emergency Medicine1936-90182021-09-0122610.5811/westjem.2021.7.50681wjem-22-1317Estimated Cost Effectiveness of Influenza Vaccination for Emergency Medical Services ProfessionalsMichael W. HubbleGinny K. RenkiewiczIntroduction: Because of their frequent contact with compromised patients, vaccination against influenza is recommended for all healthcare workers. Recent studies suggest that vaccination decreases influenza transmission to patients and reduces worker illness and absenteeism. However, few emergency medical services (EMS) agencies provide annual vaccination, and the vaccination rate among EMS personnel remains low. Reticence among EMS agencies to provide influenza vaccination to their employees may be due in part to the unknown fiscal consequences of implementing a vaccination program. In this study, we sought to estimate the cost effectiveness of an employer-provided influenza vaccination program for EMS personnel. Methods: Using data from published reports on influenza vaccination, we developed a cost-effectiveness model of vaccination for a hypothesized EMS system of 100 employees. Model inputs included vaccination costs, vaccination rate, infection rate, costs associated with absenteeism, lost productivity due to working while ill (presenteeism), and medical care for treating illness. To assess the robustness of the model we performed a series of sensitivity analyses on the input variables. Results: The proportion of employees contracting influenza or influenza-like illness (ILI) was estimated at 19% among vaccinated employees compared to 26% among non-vaccinated employees. The costs of the vaccine, consumables, and employee time for vaccination totaled $44.19 per vaccinated employee, with a total system cost of $4,419. Compared to no vaccination, a mandatory vaccination program would save $20,745 in lost productivity and medical costs, or $16,325 in net savings after accounting for vaccination costs. The savings were 3.7 times the cost of the vaccination program and were derived from avoided absenteeism ($7,988), avoided presenteeism productivity losses ($10,303), and avoided medical costs of treating employees with influenza/ILI ($2,454). Through sensitivity analyses the model was verified to be robust across a wide range of input variable assumptions. The net monetary benefits were positive across all ranges of input assumptions, but cost savings were most sensitive to the vaccination uptake rate, ILI rate, and presenteeism productivity losses. Conclusion: This cost-effectiveness analysis suggests that an employer-provided influenza vaccination program is a financially favorable strategy for reducing costs associated with influenza/ILI employee absenteeism, presenteeism, and medical care.https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0hn9b7jh
spellingShingle Michael W. Hubble
Ginny K. Renkiewicz
Estimated Cost Effectiveness of Influenza Vaccination for Emergency Medical Services Professionals
Western Journal of Emergency Medicine
title Estimated Cost Effectiveness of Influenza Vaccination for Emergency Medical Services Professionals
title_full Estimated Cost Effectiveness of Influenza Vaccination for Emergency Medical Services Professionals
title_fullStr Estimated Cost Effectiveness of Influenza Vaccination for Emergency Medical Services Professionals
title_full_unstemmed Estimated Cost Effectiveness of Influenza Vaccination for Emergency Medical Services Professionals
title_short Estimated Cost Effectiveness of Influenza Vaccination for Emergency Medical Services Professionals
title_sort estimated cost effectiveness of influenza vaccination for emergency medical services professionals
url https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0hn9b7jh
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelwhubble estimatedcosteffectivenessofinfluenzavaccinationforemergencymedicalservicesprofessionals
AT ginnykrenkiewicz estimatedcosteffectivenessofinfluenzavaccinationforemergencymedicalservicesprofessionals