Neighbour presence, not identity, influences root and shoot allocation in pea.

Competition is a key feature that structures the composition of plant communities. A growing body of evidence is showing that the presence of neighbours, especially belowground neighbours, induces varied morphological responses in plants. However, in many species, it is not known whether neighbour i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cory E Jacob, Eric Tozzi, Christian J Willenborg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5349671?pdf=render
_version_ 1818273891839115264
author Cory E Jacob
Eric Tozzi
Christian J Willenborg
author_facet Cory E Jacob
Eric Tozzi
Christian J Willenborg
author_sort Cory E Jacob
collection DOAJ
description Competition is a key feature that structures the composition of plant communities. A growing body of evidence is showing that the presence of neighbours, especially belowground neighbours, induces varied morphological responses in plants. However, in many species, it is not known whether neighbour identity also influences plant morphological responses such as biomass allocation patterns. To assess plant response to above- and belowground neighbour presence and identity, we conducted a greenhouse experiment consisting of conspecific (pea; Pisum sativum L.) and heterospecific (oat; Avena sativa L.) neighbours growing with a P. sativum focal plant. Four interaction regimes were constructed including shoot, root, or 'full' interaction (root & shoot) treatments, as well as a control with no interactions permitted. Our results showed that pea plants responded negatively to the presence of neighbours, and in particular, the presence of belowground neighbours. Treatments where belowground interactions were permitted (full and root interactions) had lower root and shoot mass fractions (R:S ratios) than where shoot interactions were permitted. Shoot and root allocation and R:S ratios of focal pea plants were not affected by neighbour identity, suggesting that neighbour presence, but not identity, influenced allocation patterns. The impact on P. sativum of a neighbouring competitor was more prominent than neighbour identity, showing that some plants may not discriminate between the identity of neighbours even though they are capable of responding to their presence.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T22:05:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-acf5ba77372a416d9a4669126353bf2c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T22:05:10Z
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-acf5ba77372a416d9a4669126353bf2c2022-12-22T00:10:25ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01123e017375810.1371/journal.pone.0173758Neighbour presence, not identity, influences root and shoot allocation in pea.Cory E JacobEric TozziChristian J WillenborgCompetition is a key feature that structures the composition of plant communities. A growing body of evidence is showing that the presence of neighbours, especially belowground neighbours, induces varied morphological responses in plants. However, in many species, it is not known whether neighbour identity also influences plant morphological responses such as biomass allocation patterns. To assess plant response to above- and belowground neighbour presence and identity, we conducted a greenhouse experiment consisting of conspecific (pea; Pisum sativum L.) and heterospecific (oat; Avena sativa L.) neighbours growing with a P. sativum focal plant. Four interaction regimes were constructed including shoot, root, or 'full' interaction (root & shoot) treatments, as well as a control with no interactions permitted. Our results showed that pea plants responded negatively to the presence of neighbours, and in particular, the presence of belowground neighbours. Treatments where belowground interactions were permitted (full and root interactions) had lower root and shoot mass fractions (R:S ratios) than where shoot interactions were permitted. Shoot and root allocation and R:S ratios of focal pea plants were not affected by neighbour identity, suggesting that neighbour presence, but not identity, influenced allocation patterns. The impact on P. sativum of a neighbouring competitor was more prominent than neighbour identity, showing that some plants may not discriminate between the identity of neighbours even though they are capable of responding to their presence.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5349671?pdf=render
spellingShingle Cory E Jacob
Eric Tozzi
Christian J Willenborg
Neighbour presence, not identity, influences root and shoot allocation in pea.
PLoS ONE
title Neighbour presence, not identity, influences root and shoot allocation in pea.
title_full Neighbour presence, not identity, influences root and shoot allocation in pea.
title_fullStr Neighbour presence, not identity, influences root and shoot allocation in pea.
title_full_unstemmed Neighbour presence, not identity, influences root and shoot allocation in pea.
title_short Neighbour presence, not identity, influences root and shoot allocation in pea.
title_sort neighbour presence not identity influences root and shoot allocation in pea
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5349671?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT coryejacob neighbourpresencenotidentityinfluencesrootandshootallocationinpea
AT erictozzi neighbourpresencenotidentityinfluencesrootandshootallocationinpea
AT christianjwillenborg neighbourpresencenotidentityinfluencesrootandshootallocationinpea