Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Chronic Stroke: Is Neuroimaging the Answer to the Next Leap Forward?

During rehabilitation, a large proportion of stroke patients either plateau or begin to lose motor skills. By priming the motor system, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising clinical adjunct that could augment the gains acquired during therapy sessions. However, the extent to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Claudia A. Salazar, Wuwei Feng, Leonardo Bonilha, Steven Kautz, Jens H. Jensen, Mark S. George, Nathan C. Rowland
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-03-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/7/2601
_version_ 1797607668880244736
author Claudia A. Salazar
Wuwei Feng
Leonardo Bonilha
Steven Kautz
Jens H. Jensen
Mark S. George
Nathan C. Rowland
author_facet Claudia A. Salazar
Wuwei Feng
Leonardo Bonilha
Steven Kautz
Jens H. Jensen
Mark S. George
Nathan C. Rowland
author_sort Claudia A. Salazar
collection DOAJ
description During rehabilitation, a large proportion of stroke patients either plateau or begin to lose motor skills. By priming the motor system, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising clinical adjunct that could augment the gains acquired during therapy sessions. However, the extent to which patients show improvements following tDCS is highly variable. This variability may be due to heterogeneity in regions of cortical infarct, descending motor tract injury, and/or connectivity changes, all factors that require neuroimaging for precise quantification and that affect the actual amount and location of current delivery. If the relationship between these factors and tDCS efficacy were clarified, recovery from stroke using tDCS might be become more predictable. This review provides a comprehensive summary and timeline of the development of tDCS for stroke from the viewpoint of neuroimaging. Both animal and human studies that have explored detailed aspects of anatomy, connectivity, and brain activation dynamics relevant to tDCS are discussed. Selected computational works are also included to demonstrate how sophisticated strategies for reducing variable effects of tDCS, including electric field modeling, are moving the field ever closer towards the goal of personalizing tDCS for each individual. Finally, larger and more comprehensive randomized controlled trials involving tDCS for chronic stroke recovery are underway that likely will shed light on how specific tDCS parameters, such as dose, affect stroke outcomes. The success of these collective efforts will determine whether tDCS for chronic stroke gains regulatory approval and becomes clinical practice in the future.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T05:33:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-acfb25200e004c00abeb875787b4c528
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T05:33:05Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-acfb25200e004c00abeb875787b4c5282023-11-17T16:59:22ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832023-03-01127260110.3390/jcm12072601Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Chronic Stroke: Is Neuroimaging the Answer to the Next Leap Forward?Claudia A. Salazar0Wuwei Feng1Leonardo Bonilha2Steven Kautz3Jens H. Jensen4Mark S. George5Nathan C. Rowland6Department of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USADepartment of Neurology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USADepartment of Neurology, College of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USADepartment of Health Sciences and Research, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USACenter for Biomedical Imaging, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USADepartment of Health Sciences and Research, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USADepartment of Neurosurgery, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USADuring rehabilitation, a large proportion of stroke patients either plateau or begin to lose motor skills. By priming the motor system, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising clinical adjunct that could augment the gains acquired during therapy sessions. However, the extent to which patients show improvements following tDCS is highly variable. This variability may be due to heterogeneity in regions of cortical infarct, descending motor tract injury, and/or connectivity changes, all factors that require neuroimaging for precise quantification and that affect the actual amount and location of current delivery. If the relationship between these factors and tDCS efficacy were clarified, recovery from stroke using tDCS might be become more predictable. This review provides a comprehensive summary and timeline of the development of tDCS for stroke from the viewpoint of neuroimaging. Both animal and human studies that have explored detailed aspects of anatomy, connectivity, and brain activation dynamics relevant to tDCS are discussed. Selected computational works are also included to demonstrate how sophisticated strategies for reducing variable effects of tDCS, including electric field modeling, are moving the field ever closer towards the goal of personalizing tDCS for each individual. Finally, larger and more comprehensive randomized controlled trials involving tDCS for chronic stroke recovery are underway that likely will shed light on how specific tDCS parameters, such as dose, affect stroke outcomes. The success of these collective efforts will determine whether tDCS for chronic stroke gains regulatory approval and becomes clinical practice in the future.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/7/2601strokeneuromodulationtranscranial direct current stimulationmagnetic resonance imaging
spellingShingle Claudia A. Salazar
Wuwei Feng
Leonardo Bonilha
Steven Kautz
Jens H. Jensen
Mark S. George
Nathan C. Rowland
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Chronic Stroke: Is Neuroimaging the Answer to the Next Leap Forward?
Journal of Clinical Medicine
stroke
neuromodulation
transcranial direct current stimulation
magnetic resonance imaging
title Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Chronic Stroke: Is Neuroimaging the Answer to the Next Leap Forward?
title_full Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Chronic Stroke: Is Neuroimaging the Answer to the Next Leap Forward?
title_fullStr Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Chronic Stroke: Is Neuroimaging the Answer to the Next Leap Forward?
title_full_unstemmed Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Chronic Stroke: Is Neuroimaging the Answer to the Next Leap Forward?
title_short Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Chronic Stroke: Is Neuroimaging the Answer to the Next Leap Forward?
title_sort transcranial direct current stimulation for chronic stroke is neuroimaging the answer to the next leap forward
topic stroke
neuromodulation
transcranial direct current stimulation
magnetic resonance imaging
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/12/7/2601
work_keys_str_mv AT claudiaasalazar transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationforchronicstrokeisneuroimagingtheanswertothenextleapforward
AT wuweifeng transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationforchronicstrokeisneuroimagingtheanswertothenextleapforward
AT leonardobonilha transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationforchronicstrokeisneuroimagingtheanswertothenextleapforward
AT stevenkautz transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationforchronicstrokeisneuroimagingtheanswertothenextleapforward
AT jenshjensen transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationforchronicstrokeisneuroimagingtheanswertothenextleapforward
AT marksgeorge transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationforchronicstrokeisneuroimagingtheanswertothenextleapforward
AT nathancrowland transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationforchronicstrokeisneuroimagingtheanswertothenextleapforward