Chromosomal Abnormalities and Pregnancy Outcomes for Fetuses With Gastrointestinal Tract Obstructions

Fetal gastrointestinal tract obstruction (GITO) is the most frequently encountered gastrointestinal defect in the prenatal period. This study aimed to investigate the genetic disorders and pregnancy outcomes of fetal GITO. We reviewed data from 70 pregnancies that were referred for invasive prenatal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiaoqing Wu, Linjuan Su, Qingmei Shen, Qun Guo, Ying Li, Shiyi Xu, Na Lin, Hailong Huang, Liangpu Xu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Pediatrics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2022.918130/full
_version_ 1811337665238269952
author Xiaoqing Wu
Xiaoqing Wu
Xiaoqing Wu
Linjuan Su
Linjuan Su
Qingmei Shen
Qingmei Shen
Qun Guo
Qun Guo
Ying Li
Ying Li
Shiyi Xu
Na Lin
Na Lin
Hailong Huang
Hailong Huang
Liangpu Xu
Liangpu Xu
author_facet Xiaoqing Wu
Xiaoqing Wu
Xiaoqing Wu
Linjuan Su
Linjuan Su
Qingmei Shen
Qingmei Shen
Qun Guo
Qun Guo
Ying Li
Ying Li
Shiyi Xu
Na Lin
Na Lin
Hailong Huang
Hailong Huang
Liangpu Xu
Liangpu Xu
author_sort Xiaoqing Wu
collection DOAJ
description Fetal gastrointestinal tract obstruction (GITO) is the most frequently encountered gastrointestinal defect in the prenatal period. This study aimed to investigate the genetic disorders and pregnancy outcomes of fetal GITO. We reviewed data from 70 pregnancies that were referred for invasive prenatal testing because of fetal GITO. According to the level of obstruction, they were classified into esophageal atresia/stenosis, duodenal atresia/stenosis, jejunal or ileal atresia/stenosis, or anal atresia. Traditional karyotyping was performed on all the 70 pregnancies, and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) was performed on 32 of them in parallel. Traditional karyotyping revealed twelve (17.1%) chromosomal abnormalities, including 11 cases of trisomy 21 (Down syndrome), and one case of a supernumerary marker chromosome related to Cat eye syndrome. According to the absence or presence of other ultrasound anomalies, they were categorized into isolated GITO (n = 36) and non-isolated GITO (n = 34). The rate of chromosomal abnormalities in the non-isolated GITO pregnancies was significantly higher than that in the isolated GITO pregnancies (29.4 vs. 5.5%, p < 0.05); the survival rate in the isolated group was significantly higher than that in the non-isolated group (67.6 vs. 34.4%, p < 0.05). Among the 32 cases where CMA was performed, an additional one (3.1%) copy number variant with clinical significance was noted in a fetus with normal karyotype. The microduplication on 7q12 was considered to be the genetic etiology of duodenal stenosis, although it was inherited from a phenotypically normal mother. Our study supports the strong association between Down syndrome and fetal GITO, especially duodenal stenosis. Our findings suggested that the risk of chromosomal abnormalities was increased when GITO was accompanied by other ultrasound anomalies; thus, chromosomal abnormalities and fetal anatomy should be carefully evaluated for pregnancy management of fetal GITO.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T17:59:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ad032456cf3742d8a2da6b727cd80f89
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-2360
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T17:59:00Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Pediatrics
spelling doaj.art-ad032456cf3742d8a2da6b727cd80f892022-12-22T02:36:21ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Pediatrics2296-23602022-06-011010.3389/fped.2022.918130918130Chromosomal Abnormalities and Pregnancy Outcomes for Fetuses With Gastrointestinal Tract ObstructionsXiaoqing Wu0Xiaoqing Wu1Xiaoqing Wu2Linjuan Su3Linjuan Su4Qingmei Shen5Qingmei Shen6Qun Guo7Qun Guo8Ying Li9Ying Li10Shiyi Xu11Na Lin12Na Lin13Hailong Huang14Hailong Huang15Liangpu Xu16Liangpu Xu17Department of Medical Genetic Diagnosis and Therapy Center, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, ChinaFujian Provincial Key Laboratory for Prenatal Diagnosis and Birth Defect, Fuzhou, ChinaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, ChinaDepartment of Medical Genetic Diagnosis and Therapy Center, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, ChinaFujian Provincial Key Laboratory for Prenatal Diagnosis and Birth Defect, Fuzhou, ChinaDepartment of Medical Genetic Diagnosis and Therapy Center, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, ChinaFujian Provincial Key Laboratory for Prenatal Diagnosis and Birth Defect, Fuzhou, ChinaDepartment of Medical Genetic Diagnosis and Therapy Center, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, ChinaFujian Provincial Key Laboratory for Prenatal Diagnosis and Birth Defect, Fuzhou, ChinaDepartment of Medical Genetic Diagnosis and Therapy Center, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, ChinaFujian Provincial Key Laboratory for Prenatal Diagnosis and Birth Defect, Fuzhou, ChinaDepartment of Pediatrics, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, ChinaDepartment of Medical Genetic Diagnosis and Therapy Center, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, ChinaFujian Provincial Key Laboratory for Prenatal Diagnosis and Birth Defect, Fuzhou, ChinaDepartment of Medical Genetic Diagnosis and Therapy Center, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, ChinaFujian Provincial Key Laboratory for Prenatal Diagnosis and Birth Defect, Fuzhou, ChinaDepartment of Medical Genetic Diagnosis and Therapy Center, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, ChinaFujian Provincial Key Laboratory for Prenatal Diagnosis and Birth Defect, Fuzhou, ChinaFetal gastrointestinal tract obstruction (GITO) is the most frequently encountered gastrointestinal defect in the prenatal period. This study aimed to investigate the genetic disorders and pregnancy outcomes of fetal GITO. We reviewed data from 70 pregnancies that were referred for invasive prenatal testing because of fetal GITO. According to the level of obstruction, they were classified into esophageal atresia/stenosis, duodenal atresia/stenosis, jejunal or ileal atresia/stenosis, or anal atresia. Traditional karyotyping was performed on all the 70 pregnancies, and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) was performed on 32 of them in parallel. Traditional karyotyping revealed twelve (17.1%) chromosomal abnormalities, including 11 cases of trisomy 21 (Down syndrome), and one case of a supernumerary marker chromosome related to Cat eye syndrome. According to the absence or presence of other ultrasound anomalies, they were categorized into isolated GITO (n = 36) and non-isolated GITO (n = 34). The rate of chromosomal abnormalities in the non-isolated GITO pregnancies was significantly higher than that in the isolated GITO pregnancies (29.4 vs. 5.5%, p < 0.05); the survival rate in the isolated group was significantly higher than that in the non-isolated group (67.6 vs. 34.4%, p < 0.05). Among the 32 cases where CMA was performed, an additional one (3.1%) copy number variant with clinical significance was noted in a fetus with normal karyotype. The microduplication on 7q12 was considered to be the genetic etiology of duodenal stenosis, although it was inherited from a phenotypically normal mother. Our study supports the strong association between Down syndrome and fetal GITO, especially duodenal stenosis. Our findings suggested that the risk of chromosomal abnormalities was increased when GITO was accompanied by other ultrasound anomalies; thus, chromosomal abnormalities and fetal anatomy should be carefully evaluated for pregnancy management of fetal GITO.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2022.918130/fullgastrointestinal tract obstructionstraditional karyotypingchromosomal abnormalitieschromosomal microarray analysisDown syndromecopy number variants
spellingShingle Xiaoqing Wu
Xiaoqing Wu
Xiaoqing Wu
Linjuan Su
Linjuan Su
Qingmei Shen
Qingmei Shen
Qun Guo
Qun Guo
Ying Li
Ying Li
Shiyi Xu
Na Lin
Na Lin
Hailong Huang
Hailong Huang
Liangpu Xu
Liangpu Xu
Chromosomal Abnormalities and Pregnancy Outcomes for Fetuses With Gastrointestinal Tract Obstructions
Frontiers in Pediatrics
gastrointestinal tract obstructions
traditional karyotyping
chromosomal abnormalities
chromosomal microarray analysis
Down syndrome
copy number variants
title Chromosomal Abnormalities and Pregnancy Outcomes for Fetuses With Gastrointestinal Tract Obstructions
title_full Chromosomal Abnormalities and Pregnancy Outcomes for Fetuses With Gastrointestinal Tract Obstructions
title_fullStr Chromosomal Abnormalities and Pregnancy Outcomes for Fetuses With Gastrointestinal Tract Obstructions
title_full_unstemmed Chromosomal Abnormalities and Pregnancy Outcomes for Fetuses With Gastrointestinal Tract Obstructions
title_short Chromosomal Abnormalities and Pregnancy Outcomes for Fetuses With Gastrointestinal Tract Obstructions
title_sort chromosomal abnormalities and pregnancy outcomes for fetuses with gastrointestinal tract obstructions
topic gastrointestinal tract obstructions
traditional karyotyping
chromosomal abnormalities
chromosomal microarray analysis
Down syndrome
copy number variants
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2022.918130/full
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaoqingwu chromosomalabnormalitiesandpregnancyoutcomesforfetuseswithgastrointestinaltractobstructions
AT xiaoqingwu chromosomalabnormalitiesandpregnancyoutcomesforfetuseswithgastrointestinaltractobstructions
AT xiaoqingwu chromosomalabnormalitiesandpregnancyoutcomesforfetuseswithgastrointestinaltractobstructions
AT linjuansu chromosomalabnormalitiesandpregnancyoutcomesforfetuseswithgastrointestinaltractobstructions
AT linjuansu chromosomalabnormalitiesandpregnancyoutcomesforfetuseswithgastrointestinaltractobstructions
AT qingmeishen chromosomalabnormalitiesandpregnancyoutcomesforfetuseswithgastrointestinaltractobstructions
AT qingmeishen chromosomalabnormalitiesandpregnancyoutcomesforfetuseswithgastrointestinaltractobstructions
AT qunguo chromosomalabnormalitiesandpregnancyoutcomesforfetuseswithgastrointestinaltractobstructions
AT qunguo chromosomalabnormalitiesandpregnancyoutcomesforfetuseswithgastrointestinaltractobstructions
AT yingli chromosomalabnormalitiesandpregnancyoutcomesforfetuseswithgastrointestinaltractobstructions
AT yingli chromosomalabnormalitiesandpregnancyoutcomesforfetuseswithgastrointestinaltractobstructions
AT shiyixu chromosomalabnormalitiesandpregnancyoutcomesforfetuseswithgastrointestinaltractobstructions
AT nalin chromosomalabnormalitiesandpregnancyoutcomesforfetuseswithgastrointestinaltractobstructions
AT nalin chromosomalabnormalitiesandpregnancyoutcomesforfetuseswithgastrointestinaltractobstructions
AT hailonghuang chromosomalabnormalitiesandpregnancyoutcomesforfetuseswithgastrointestinaltractobstructions
AT hailonghuang chromosomalabnormalitiesandpregnancyoutcomesforfetuseswithgastrointestinaltractobstructions
AT liangpuxu chromosomalabnormalitiesandpregnancyoutcomesforfetuseswithgastrointestinaltractobstructions
AT liangpuxu chromosomalabnormalitiesandpregnancyoutcomesforfetuseswithgastrointestinaltractobstructions