New Insights on the Minimal-Invasive Therapy of Cervical Cancer

Objective: The ideal management of early-stage cervical cancer has become the subject of a global controversy following the publication of a prospective study in 2018 that reported a worse oncologic outcome when comparing the minimally invasive approach to the laparotomy approach. The discussion inv...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Khayal Gasimli, Lisa Wilhelm, Sven Becker, Rudy Leon De Wilde, Morva Tahmasbi Rad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-08-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/16/4919
_version_ 1797409559105503232
author Khayal Gasimli
Lisa Wilhelm
Sven Becker
Rudy Leon De Wilde
Morva Tahmasbi Rad
author_facet Khayal Gasimli
Lisa Wilhelm
Sven Becker
Rudy Leon De Wilde
Morva Tahmasbi Rad
author_sort Khayal Gasimli
collection DOAJ
description Objective: The ideal management of early-stage cervical cancer has become the subject of a global controversy following the publication of a prospective study in 2018 that reported a worse oncologic outcome when comparing the minimally invasive approach to the laparotomy approach. The discussion involves both prospective and retrospective data and general and theoretical considerations. We wanted to look at the data available today and review the different opinions, offering an impartial assessment of the ongoing controversy. Methods: The available literature was reviewed, focusing on articles arguing for and against minimally invasive surgery in cervical cancer. We tried to avoid any fundamental bias, as is often evident in the available reviews on the subject. Literature both before and after the 2018 publication was taken into consideration. Results: As is usual in discussions of concepts, the literature that is now available provides arguments for both sides of this challenging issue, depending on one’s standpoint. Science-related writing is not immune to trends. There is a curious shift in opinion seen before and after 2018. One must question whether there was a prejudice in favor of minimally invasive surgery prior to the publication of the NEJM articles and a bias against it afterward. Conclusion: Whether further minimally invasive surgery for cervical cancer is invariable is tied to the more pressing question of how this surgery will have to be centralized in the future. Unless these questions are linked, no satisfactory solution can be found.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T04:16:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ad050837120f4d5ead66d9828f6dc4d6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T04:16:31Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-ad050837120f4d5ead66d9828f6dc4d62023-12-03T13:53:24ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832022-08-011116491910.3390/jcm11164919New Insights on the Minimal-Invasive Therapy of Cervical CancerKhayal Gasimli0Lisa Wilhelm1Sven Becker2Rudy Leon De Wilde3Morva Tahmasbi Rad4Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Frankfurt Goethe University Hospital, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt, GermanyDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Frankfurt Goethe University Hospital, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt, GermanyDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Frankfurt Goethe University Hospital, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt, GermanyDepartment of Gynecology, Carl-von-Ossietzky University, 26129 Oldenburg, GermanyDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Frankfurt Goethe University Hospital, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt, GermanyObjective: The ideal management of early-stage cervical cancer has become the subject of a global controversy following the publication of a prospective study in 2018 that reported a worse oncologic outcome when comparing the minimally invasive approach to the laparotomy approach. The discussion involves both prospective and retrospective data and general and theoretical considerations. We wanted to look at the data available today and review the different opinions, offering an impartial assessment of the ongoing controversy. Methods: The available literature was reviewed, focusing on articles arguing for and against minimally invasive surgery in cervical cancer. We tried to avoid any fundamental bias, as is often evident in the available reviews on the subject. Literature both before and after the 2018 publication was taken into consideration. Results: As is usual in discussions of concepts, the literature that is now available provides arguments for both sides of this challenging issue, depending on one’s standpoint. Science-related writing is not immune to trends. There is a curious shift in opinion seen before and after 2018. One must question whether there was a prejudice in favor of minimally invasive surgery prior to the publication of the NEJM articles and a bias against it afterward. Conclusion: Whether further minimally invasive surgery for cervical cancer is invariable is tied to the more pressing question of how this surgery will have to be centralized in the future. Unless these questions are linked, no satisfactory solution can be found.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/16/4919cervical cancerlaparoscopylaparotomyminimally invasive surgeryoncology
spellingShingle Khayal Gasimli
Lisa Wilhelm
Sven Becker
Rudy Leon De Wilde
Morva Tahmasbi Rad
New Insights on the Minimal-Invasive Therapy of Cervical Cancer
Journal of Clinical Medicine
cervical cancer
laparoscopy
laparotomy
minimally invasive surgery
oncology
title New Insights on the Minimal-Invasive Therapy of Cervical Cancer
title_full New Insights on the Minimal-Invasive Therapy of Cervical Cancer
title_fullStr New Insights on the Minimal-Invasive Therapy of Cervical Cancer
title_full_unstemmed New Insights on the Minimal-Invasive Therapy of Cervical Cancer
title_short New Insights on the Minimal-Invasive Therapy of Cervical Cancer
title_sort new insights on the minimal invasive therapy of cervical cancer
topic cervical cancer
laparoscopy
laparotomy
minimally invasive surgery
oncology
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/16/4919
work_keys_str_mv AT khayalgasimli newinsightsontheminimalinvasivetherapyofcervicalcancer
AT lisawilhelm newinsightsontheminimalinvasivetherapyofcervicalcancer
AT svenbecker newinsightsontheminimalinvasivetherapyofcervicalcancer
AT rudyleondewilde newinsightsontheminimalinvasivetherapyofcervicalcancer
AT morvatahmasbirad newinsightsontheminimalinvasivetherapyofcervicalcancer