ICJ genocide judgment in the dispute between Croatia and Serbia: Legal analysis and its importance for mutual relations
The Judgment of the International Court of Justice in the case of mutual claims for the breach of the Genocide Convention between Croatia and Serbia represents the final outcome of 16 years of a dispute which burdened their bilateral relations on everyday basis. Bearing in mind that the Int...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Institute of International Politics and Economics, Belgrade
2015-01-01
|
Series: | Međunarodni Problemi |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0025-8555/2015/0025-85551501007V.pdf |
_version_ | 1797287651155378176 |
---|---|
author | Vučić Mihajlo Novaković Marko |
author_facet | Vučić Mihajlo Novaković Marko |
author_sort | Vučić Mihajlo |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The Judgment of the International Court of Justice in the case of mutual
claims for the breach of the Genocide Convention between Croatia and Serbia
represents the final outcome of 16 years of a dispute which burdened their
bilateral relations on everyday basis. Bearing in mind that the International
Court of Justice, as the international judicial authority with highest
legitimacy in contemporary international order, found both claims to be
unfounded, the judgment can represent an impulse for governments of both
countries to settle the problematic legacy of years of conflict and mutual
allegations. However, some passages from the judgment might be used also as
means of diplomatic pressure by both governments, since the International
Court of Justice blamed the Croatian government for the grave crimes short of
genocide commited during the Operation Storm, but also adopted the
interpretation of the ICTY’s joint criminal enterprise jurisprudence which
foreshadows further prosecutions for political personalities allegedly
connected with the conception of Greater Serbia. [Projekat Ministarstva nauke
Republike Srbije, br. 179029: Srbija u savremenim međunarodnim odnosima:
Strateški pravci razvoja i učvršćivanja položaja Srbije u međunarodnim
integrativnim procesima - spoljnopolitički, međunarodnoekonomski, pravni i
bezbednosni aspekti] |
first_indexed | 2024-03-07T18:37:30Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-ad34105672024410ad80b17f572cc324 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 0025-8555 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-07T18:37:30Z |
publishDate | 2015-01-01 |
publisher | Institute of International Politics and Economics, Belgrade |
record_format | Article |
series | Međunarodni Problemi |
spelling | doaj.art-ad34105672024410ad80b17f572cc3242024-03-02T04:49:02ZengInstitute of International Politics and Economics, BelgradeMeđunarodni Problemi0025-85552015-01-0167174410.2298/MEDJP1501007V0025-85551501007VICJ genocide judgment in the dispute between Croatia and Serbia: Legal analysis and its importance for mutual relationsVučić Mihajlo0Novaković Marko1Institut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu, BeogradInstitut za međunarodnu politiku i privredu, BeogradThe Judgment of the International Court of Justice in the case of mutual claims for the breach of the Genocide Convention between Croatia and Serbia represents the final outcome of 16 years of a dispute which burdened their bilateral relations on everyday basis. Bearing in mind that the International Court of Justice, as the international judicial authority with highest legitimacy in contemporary international order, found both claims to be unfounded, the judgment can represent an impulse for governments of both countries to settle the problematic legacy of years of conflict and mutual allegations. However, some passages from the judgment might be used also as means of diplomatic pressure by both governments, since the International Court of Justice blamed the Croatian government for the grave crimes short of genocide commited during the Operation Storm, but also adopted the interpretation of the ICTY’s joint criminal enterprise jurisprudence which foreshadows further prosecutions for political personalities allegedly connected with the conception of Greater Serbia. [Projekat Ministarstva nauke Republike Srbije, br. 179029: Srbija u savremenim međunarodnim odnosima: Strateški pravci razvoja i učvršćivanja položaja Srbije u međunarodnim integrativnim procesima - spoljnopolitički, međunarodnoekonomski, pravni i bezbednosni aspekti]http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0025-8555/2015/0025-85551501007V.pdfgenocideInternational Court of JusticeCroatiaSerbiainternational criminal law |
spellingShingle | Vučić Mihajlo Novaković Marko ICJ genocide judgment in the dispute between Croatia and Serbia: Legal analysis and its importance for mutual relations Međunarodni Problemi genocide International Court of Justice Croatia Serbia international criminal law |
title | ICJ genocide judgment in the dispute between Croatia and Serbia: Legal analysis and its importance for mutual relations |
title_full | ICJ genocide judgment in the dispute between Croatia and Serbia: Legal analysis and its importance for mutual relations |
title_fullStr | ICJ genocide judgment in the dispute between Croatia and Serbia: Legal analysis and its importance for mutual relations |
title_full_unstemmed | ICJ genocide judgment in the dispute between Croatia and Serbia: Legal analysis and its importance for mutual relations |
title_short | ICJ genocide judgment in the dispute between Croatia and Serbia: Legal analysis and its importance for mutual relations |
title_sort | icj genocide judgment in the dispute between croatia and serbia legal analysis and its importance for mutual relations |
topic | genocide International Court of Justice Croatia Serbia international criminal law |
url | http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0025-8555/2015/0025-85551501007V.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vucicmihajlo icjgenocidejudgmentinthedisputebetweencroatiaandserbialegalanalysisanditsimportanceformutualrelations AT novakovicmarko icjgenocidejudgmentinthedisputebetweencroatiaandserbialegalanalysisanditsimportanceformutualrelations |