Large‐scale eDNA monitoring of multiple aquatic pathogens as a tool to provide risk maps for wildlife diseases

Abstract Multiple parasites and pathogens cause disease in aquatic wildlife and in aquaculture species, generating a need for monitoring and management. Conventional disease monitoring methods involve laborious, costly, and invasive capture and examination of host species, and require specialized ex...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Natalie Sieber, Alex King, Raphael Krieg, Armin Zenker, Christoph Vorburger, Hanna Hartikainen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-01-01
Series:Environmental DNA
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.427
_version_ 1797277038073085952
author Natalie Sieber
Alex King
Raphael Krieg
Armin Zenker
Christoph Vorburger
Hanna Hartikainen
author_facet Natalie Sieber
Alex King
Raphael Krieg
Armin Zenker
Christoph Vorburger
Hanna Hartikainen
author_sort Natalie Sieber
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Multiple parasites and pathogens cause disease in aquatic wildlife and in aquaculture species, generating a need for monitoring and management. Conventional disease monitoring methods involve laborious, costly, and invasive capture and examination of host species, and require specialized expertise for every host and pathogen of interest. Environmental DNA could provide simultaneous occurrence data for multiple pathogens across different host taxa, valuable for using parasite diversity as, for example, a bioindicator of ecosystem disturbance. Here, we tested the potential for simultaneous detection of four wildlife pathogens in water samples from 280, mainly riverine, sites across Switzerland. We targeted the crayfish pathogen Aphanomyces astaci, the amphibian pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, and the fish pathogens Saprolegnia parasitica and Tetracapsuloides bryosalmonae. The eDNA detection showed a widespread distribution of A. astaci, S. parasitica, and T. bryosalmonae, although A. astaci and T. bryosalmonae were not detected in some alpine river catchments. B. dendrobatidis was detected only rarely, which was expected since the sampling did not target amphibian breeding sites. Co‐detection rates were higher in rivers than in lakes, likely reflecting the habitat preferences and distributions of the host species. We discuss the advantages and limitations of eDNA‐based pathogen monitoring and list a set of recommendations for managers. Our study illustrates how eDNA‐based techniques can monitor several pathogen species concurrently, thus facilitating more comprehensive disease monitoring schemes. Combined with metabarcoding approaches in the future, eDNA‐based sampling and detection can facilitate the incorporation of parasite and pathogen occurrence and diversity as an indicator for aquatic ecosystem health, and for revealing the hidden biodiversity and structure of parasite communities.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T15:37:53Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ad383014255849a9acff82c4997cc617
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2637-4943
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T15:37:53Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Environmental DNA
spelling doaj.art-ad383014255849a9acff82c4997cc6172024-03-05T09:32:37ZengWileyEnvironmental DNA2637-49432024-01-0161n/an/a10.1002/edn3.427Large‐scale eDNA monitoring of multiple aquatic pathogens as a tool to provide risk maps for wildlife diseasesNatalie Sieber0Alex King1Raphael Krieg2Armin Zenker3Christoph Vorburger4Hanna Hartikainen5Eawag Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology Dübendorf SwitzerlandUniversity of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland Muttenz SwitzerlandUniversity of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland Muttenz SwitzerlandUniversity of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland Muttenz SwitzerlandEawag Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology Dübendorf SwitzerlandEawag Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology Dübendorf SwitzerlandAbstract Multiple parasites and pathogens cause disease in aquatic wildlife and in aquaculture species, generating a need for monitoring and management. Conventional disease monitoring methods involve laborious, costly, and invasive capture and examination of host species, and require specialized expertise for every host and pathogen of interest. Environmental DNA could provide simultaneous occurrence data for multiple pathogens across different host taxa, valuable for using parasite diversity as, for example, a bioindicator of ecosystem disturbance. Here, we tested the potential for simultaneous detection of four wildlife pathogens in water samples from 280, mainly riverine, sites across Switzerland. We targeted the crayfish pathogen Aphanomyces astaci, the amphibian pathogen Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, and the fish pathogens Saprolegnia parasitica and Tetracapsuloides bryosalmonae. The eDNA detection showed a widespread distribution of A. astaci, S. parasitica, and T. bryosalmonae, although A. astaci and T. bryosalmonae were not detected in some alpine river catchments. B. dendrobatidis was detected only rarely, which was expected since the sampling did not target amphibian breeding sites. Co‐detection rates were higher in rivers than in lakes, likely reflecting the habitat preferences and distributions of the host species. We discuss the advantages and limitations of eDNA‐based pathogen monitoring and list a set of recommendations for managers. Our study illustrates how eDNA‐based techniques can monitor several pathogen species concurrently, thus facilitating more comprehensive disease monitoring schemes. Combined with metabarcoding approaches in the future, eDNA‐based sampling and detection can facilitate the incorporation of parasite and pathogen occurrence and diversity as an indicator for aquatic ecosystem health, and for revealing the hidden biodiversity and structure of parasite communities.https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.427Aphanomyces astaciBatrachochytrium dendrobatidisdisease surveillanceenvironmental DNApathogen monitoringSaprolegnia parasitica
spellingShingle Natalie Sieber
Alex King
Raphael Krieg
Armin Zenker
Christoph Vorburger
Hanna Hartikainen
Large‐scale eDNA monitoring of multiple aquatic pathogens as a tool to provide risk maps for wildlife diseases
Environmental DNA
Aphanomyces astaci
Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis
disease surveillance
environmental DNA
pathogen monitoring
Saprolegnia parasitica
title Large‐scale eDNA monitoring of multiple aquatic pathogens as a tool to provide risk maps for wildlife diseases
title_full Large‐scale eDNA monitoring of multiple aquatic pathogens as a tool to provide risk maps for wildlife diseases
title_fullStr Large‐scale eDNA monitoring of multiple aquatic pathogens as a tool to provide risk maps for wildlife diseases
title_full_unstemmed Large‐scale eDNA monitoring of multiple aquatic pathogens as a tool to provide risk maps for wildlife diseases
title_short Large‐scale eDNA monitoring of multiple aquatic pathogens as a tool to provide risk maps for wildlife diseases
title_sort large scale edna monitoring of multiple aquatic pathogens as a tool to provide risk maps for wildlife diseases
topic Aphanomyces astaci
Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis
disease surveillance
environmental DNA
pathogen monitoring
Saprolegnia parasitica
url https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.427
work_keys_str_mv AT nataliesieber largescaleednamonitoringofmultipleaquaticpathogensasatooltoprovideriskmapsforwildlifediseases
AT alexking largescaleednamonitoringofmultipleaquaticpathogensasatooltoprovideriskmapsforwildlifediseases
AT raphaelkrieg largescaleednamonitoringofmultipleaquaticpathogensasatooltoprovideriskmapsforwildlifediseases
AT arminzenker largescaleednamonitoringofmultipleaquaticpathogensasatooltoprovideriskmapsforwildlifediseases
AT christophvorburger largescaleednamonitoringofmultipleaquaticpathogensasatooltoprovideriskmapsforwildlifediseases
AT hannahartikainen largescaleednamonitoringofmultipleaquaticpathogensasatooltoprovideriskmapsforwildlifediseases