The Proposed TTIP Tribunal and the Court of Justice: What Limits to Investor-State Dispute Settlement under EU Constitutional Law?
<p>In its controversial Opinion 2/13, the European Court of Justice has rejected the accession of the EU to the European Convention on Human Rights. The constitutional hurdles the CJEU has erected in this opinion are not only relevant in the area of human rights, but also require us to think h...
Main Author: | Stephan Schill |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH
|
Series: | Verfassungsblog |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://verfassungsblog.de/the-proposed-ttip-tribunal-and-the-court-of-justice-what-limits-to-investor-state-dispute-settlement-under-eu-constitutional-law/ |
Similar Items
-
Das TTIP-Gericht: Keimzelle oder Stolperstein für echte Multilateralisierung des internationalen Investitionsrechts?
by: Stephan Schill -
TRANSATLANTİK TİCARET VE YATIRIM ORTAKLIĞI (TTIP) ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME / An Evaluation On Transatlantic Trade And Investment Partnership (TTIP)
by: Ali Rıza Sandalcılar, et al.
Published: (2017-08-01) -
The effects of the TTIP on EU countries: An ex-ante evaluation
by: Jose Villaverde, et al.
Published: (2016-03-01) -
The TTIP Negotiations Innovations: On Legal Reasons for Cheer
by: Elaine Fahey -
THE ACQUIS COMMUNAUTAIRE WITHIN TTIP - THE CASE OF ROMANIA
by: Ioana GUTU
Published: (2015-11-01)