Clinical outcome of endoscopic management in delayed postpolypectomy bleeding

Background/Aims: The clinical course after endoscopic management of delayed postpolypectomy bleeding (DPPB) has not been clearly determined. This study aimed to assess clinical outcomes after endoscopic hemostasis of DPPB and evaluate risk factors for rebleeding after initial hemostasis.Methods: We...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jeong-Mi Lee, Wan Soo Kim, Min Seob Kwak, Sung-Wook Hwang, Dong-Hoon Yang, Seung-Jae Myung, Suk-Kyun Yang, Jeong-Sik Byeon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases 2017-04-01
Series:Intestinal Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2017.15.2.221
_version_ 1828923228679045120
author Jeong-Mi Lee
Wan Soo Kim
Min Seob Kwak
Sung-Wook Hwang
Dong-Hoon Yang
Seung-Jae Myung
Suk-Kyun Yang
Jeong-Sik Byeon
author_facet Jeong-Mi Lee
Wan Soo Kim
Min Seob Kwak
Sung-Wook Hwang
Dong-Hoon Yang
Seung-Jae Myung
Suk-Kyun Yang
Jeong-Sik Byeon
author_sort Jeong-Mi Lee
collection DOAJ
description Background/Aims: The clinical course after endoscopic management of delayed postpolypectomy bleeding (DPPB) has not been clearly determined. This study aimed to assess clinical outcomes after endoscopic hemostasis of DPPB and evaluate risk factors for rebleeding after initial hemostasis.Methods: We reviewed medical records of 198 patients who developed DPPB and underwent endoscopic hemostasis between January 2010 and February 2015. The performance of endoscopic hemostasis was assessed. Rebleeding negative and positive patients were compared.Results: DPPB developed 1.4±1.6 days after colonoscopic polypectomy. All patients achieved initial hemostasis. Clipping was the most commonly used technique. Of 198 DPPB patients, 15 (7.6%) had rebleeding 3.3±2.5 days after initial hemostasis. The number of clips required for hemostasis was higher in the rebleeding positive group (3.2±1.6 vs. 4.2±1.9, P=0.047). Combinations of clipping with other modalities such as injection methods were more common in the rebleeding positive group (67/291, 23.0% vs. 12/17, 70.6%; P<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed a large number of clips and combination therapy were independent risk factors for rebleeding. All the rebleeding cases were successfully managed by repeat endoscopic hemostasis.Conclusions: Endoscopic hemostasis is effective for the management of DPPB because of its high initial hemostasis rate and low rebleeding rate. Endoscopists should carefully observe patients in whom a large number of clips and/or combination therapy have been used to manage DPPB because these may be related to the severity of DPPB and a higher risk of rebleeding.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T22:36:48Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ad41473fb065468fb04ce9cb75d86e9d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1598-9100
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T22:36:48Z
publishDate 2017-04-01
publisher Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases
record_format Article
series Intestinal Research
spelling doaj.art-ad41473fb065468fb04ce9cb75d86e9d2022-12-21T23:28:58ZengKorean Association for the Study of Intestinal DiseasesIntestinal Research1598-91002017-04-0115222122710.5217/ir.2017.15.2.221ir.2017.15.2.221Clinical outcome of endoscopic management in delayed postpolypectomy bleedingJeong-Mi Lee0Wan Soo Kim1Min Seob Kwak2Sung-Wook Hwang3Dong-Hoon Yang4Seung-Jae Myung5Suk-Kyun Yang6Jeong-Sik Byeon7Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.Background/Aims: The clinical course after endoscopic management of delayed postpolypectomy bleeding (DPPB) has not been clearly determined. This study aimed to assess clinical outcomes after endoscopic hemostasis of DPPB and evaluate risk factors for rebleeding after initial hemostasis.Methods: We reviewed medical records of 198 patients who developed DPPB and underwent endoscopic hemostasis between January 2010 and February 2015. The performance of endoscopic hemostasis was assessed. Rebleeding negative and positive patients were compared.Results: DPPB developed 1.4±1.6 days after colonoscopic polypectomy. All patients achieved initial hemostasis. Clipping was the most commonly used technique. Of 198 DPPB patients, 15 (7.6%) had rebleeding 3.3±2.5 days after initial hemostasis. The number of clips required for hemostasis was higher in the rebleeding positive group (3.2±1.6 vs. 4.2±1.9, P=0.047). Combinations of clipping with other modalities such as injection methods were more common in the rebleeding positive group (67/291, 23.0% vs. 12/17, 70.6%; P<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed a large number of clips and combination therapy were independent risk factors for rebleeding. All the rebleeding cases were successfully managed by repeat endoscopic hemostasis.Conclusions: Endoscopic hemostasis is effective for the management of DPPB because of its high initial hemostasis rate and low rebleeding rate. Endoscopists should carefully observe patients in whom a large number of clips and/or combination therapy have been used to manage DPPB because these may be related to the severity of DPPB and a higher risk of rebleeding.https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2017.15.2.221ColonoscopyPostpolypectomy bleedingClipRebleeding
spellingShingle Jeong-Mi Lee
Wan Soo Kim
Min Seob Kwak
Sung-Wook Hwang
Dong-Hoon Yang
Seung-Jae Myung
Suk-Kyun Yang
Jeong-Sik Byeon
Clinical outcome of endoscopic management in delayed postpolypectomy bleeding
Intestinal Research
Colonoscopy
Postpolypectomy bleeding
Clip
Rebleeding
title Clinical outcome of endoscopic management in delayed postpolypectomy bleeding
title_full Clinical outcome of endoscopic management in delayed postpolypectomy bleeding
title_fullStr Clinical outcome of endoscopic management in delayed postpolypectomy bleeding
title_full_unstemmed Clinical outcome of endoscopic management in delayed postpolypectomy bleeding
title_short Clinical outcome of endoscopic management in delayed postpolypectomy bleeding
title_sort clinical outcome of endoscopic management in delayed postpolypectomy bleeding
topic Colonoscopy
Postpolypectomy bleeding
Clip
Rebleeding
url https://doi.org/10.5217/ir.2017.15.2.221
work_keys_str_mv AT jeongmilee clinicaloutcomeofendoscopicmanagementindelayedpostpolypectomybleeding
AT wansookim clinicaloutcomeofendoscopicmanagementindelayedpostpolypectomybleeding
AT minseobkwak clinicaloutcomeofendoscopicmanagementindelayedpostpolypectomybleeding
AT sungwookhwang clinicaloutcomeofendoscopicmanagementindelayedpostpolypectomybleeding
AT donghoonyang clinicaloutcomeofendoscopicmanagementindelayedpostpolypectomybleeding
AT seungjaemyung clinicaloutcomeofendoscopicmanagementindelayedpostpolypectomybleeding
AT sukkyunyang clinicaloutcomeofendoscopicmanagementindelayedpostpolypectomybleeding
AT jeongsikbyeon clinicaloutcomeofendoscopicmanagementindelayedpostpolypectomybleeding