Satisfaction, self-confidence and self-efficacy in the use of clinical simulations: comparisons between health undergraduates and professionals
Objective: to analyze the levels of satisfaction, self-confidence, and self-efficacy in clinical simulations among health undergraduates and professionals. Methods: cross-sectional study based on Design Science Research Methodology, with 156 health professionals and 149 health undergraduates who par...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidade Federal do Ceará
2023-10-01
|
Series: | Rev Rene |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/91858/249786 |
_version_ | 1827795381943009280 |
---|---|
author | Viviane Christine dos Reis Alves Almeida Jaqueline Costa Lima Gímerson Erick Ferreira João Lucas Campos de Oliveira Jocilene de Carvalho Miraveti Mara Regina Rosa Ribeiro |
author_facet | Viviane Christine dos Reis Alves Almeida Jaqueline Costa Lima Gímerson Erick Ferreira João Lucas Campos de Oliveira Jocilene de Carvalho Miraveti Mara Regina Rosa Ribeiro |
author_sort | Viviane Christine dos Reis Alves Almeida |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Objective: to analyze the levels of satisfaction, self-confidence, and self-efficacy in clinical simulations among health undergraduates and professionals. Methods: cross-sectional study based on Design Science Research Methodology, with 156 health professionals and 149 health undergraduates who participated in an educational session about personal protective equipment use during the COVID-19 pandemic, mediated by Rapid-Cycle Deliberate Practice. Participants responded to a social and work-related questionnaire and to validated scales. For descriptive analysis of independent samples, Chi-squared test and Student's t were used considering p<0.05 as significant. Results: we found generally high satisfaction levels (mean ± standard deviation: 4.72±0.58), self-confidence (4.44±0.78), and self-efficacy (4.03±1.17) for favorable items. There were significant statistical differences in seven items in the scale of satisfaction and self-confidence with learning in students, and in six items of the general self-efficacy scale, with p<0.05. Conclusion: undergraduates showed higher means of satisfaction and self-confidence with learning, while professionals had higher means of self-efficacy. These results can collaborate for the continuity of clinical simulation practices, increasing procedural safety and quality. Contributions to practice: the results show that the activities had a positive contribution, increasing learning opportunities and practical experiences that reflect on the excellence of the routine. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-11T18:48:53Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-ad421771b8624d73a2061326ecdf4e36 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2175-6783 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-11T18:48:53Z |
publishDate | 2023-10-01 |
publisher | Universidade Federal do Ceará |
record_format | Article |
series | Rev Rene |
spelling | doaj.art-ad421771b8624d73a2061326ecdf4e362023-10-11T13:53:56ZengUniversidade Federal do CearáRev Rene2175-67832023-10-0124e9185810.15253/2175-6783.20232491858Satisfaction, self-confidence and self-efficacy in the use of clinical simulations: comparisons between health undergraduates and professionalsViviane Christine dos Reis Alves Almeida0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4680-2346Jaqueline Costa Lima1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2264-3301Gímerson Erick Ferreira2https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4039-0205João Lucas Campos de Oliveira3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1822-2360Jocilene de Carvalho Miraveti4https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5432-4890Mara Regina Rosa Ribeiro5https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7132-3005Hospital Universitário Júlio MullerUniversidade Federal de Mato GrossoUniversidade Federal de Mato GrossoUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulUniversidade Federal de Mato GrossoUniversidade Federal de Mato GrossoObjective: to analyze the levels of satisfaction, self-confidence, and self-efficacy in clinical simulations among health undergraduates and professionals. Methods: cross-sectional study based on Design Science Research Methodology, with 156 health professionals and 149 health undergraduates who participated in an educational session about personal protective equipment use during the COVID-19 pandemic, mediated by Rapid-Cycle Deliberate Practice. Participants responded to a social and work-related questionnaire and to validated scales. For descriptive analysis of independent samples, Chi-squared test and Student's t were used considering p<0.05 as significant. Results: we found generally high satisfaction levels (mean ± standard deviation: 4.72±0.58), self-confidence (4.44±0.78), and self-efficacy (4.03±1.17) for favorable items. There were significant statistical differences in seven items in the scale of satisfaction and self-confidence with learning in students, and in six items of the general self-efficacy scale, with p<0.05. Conclusion: undergraduates showed higher means of satisfaction and self-confidence with learning, while professionals had higher means of self-efficacy. These results can collaborate for the continuity of clinical simulation practices, increasing procedural safety and quality. Contributions to practice: the results show that the activities had a positive contribution, increasing learning opportunities and practical experiences that reflect on the excellence of the routine.http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/91858/249786personal protective equipment; covid-19; simulation training. |
spellingShingle | Viviane Christine dos Reis Alves Almeida Jaqueline Costa Lima Gímerson Erick Ferreira João Lucas Campos de Oliveira Jocilene de Carvalho Miraveti Mara Regina Rosa Ribeiro Satisfaction, self-confidence and self-efficacy in the use of clinical simulations: comparisons between health undergraduates and professionals Rev Rene personal protective equipment; covid-19; simulation training. |
title | Satisfaction, self-confidence and self-efficacy in the use of clinical simulations: comparisons between health undergraduates and professionals |
title_full | Satisfaction, self-confidence and self-efficacy in the use of clinical simulations: comparisons between health undergraduates and professionals |
title_fullStr | Satisfaction, self-confidence and self-efficacy in the use of clinical simulations: comparisons between health undergraduates and professionals |
title_full_unstemmed | Satisfaction, self-confidence and self-efficacy in the use of clinical simulations: comparisons between health undergraduates and professionals |
title_short | Satisfaction, self-confidence and self-efficacy in the use of clinical simulations: comparisons between health undergraduates and professionals |
title_sort | satisfaction self confidence and self efficacy in the use of clinical simulations comparisons between health undergraduates and professionals |
topic | personal protective equipment; covid-19; simulation training. |
url | http://periodicos.ufc.br/rene/article/view/91858/249786 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vivianechristinedosreisalvesalmeida satisfactionselfconfidenceandselfefficacyintheuseofclinicalsimulationscomparisonsbetweenhealthundergraduatesandprofessionals AT jaquelinecostalima satisfactionselfconfidenceandselfefficacyintheuseofclinicalsimulationscomparisonsbetweenhealthundergraduatesandprofessionals AT gimersonerickferreira satisfactionselfconfidenceandselfefficacyintheuseofclinicalsimulationscomparisonsbetweenhealthundergraduatesandprofessionals AT joaolucascamposdeoliveira satisfactionselfconfidenceandselfefficacyintheuseofclinicalsimulationscomparisonsbetweenhealthundergraduatesandprofessionals AT jocilenedecarvalhomiraveti satisfactionselfconfidenceandselfefficacyintheuseofclinicalsimulationscomparisonsbetweenhealthundergraduatesandprofessionals AT marareginarosaribeiro satisfactionselfconfidenceandselfefficacyintheuseofclinicalsimulationscomparisonsbetweenhealthundergraduatesandprofessionals |