A Comparison of the Oral Microbiota in Healthy Dogs and Dogs with Oral Tumors

The aim of this study was to further describe the oral microbiota of healthy dogs by DNA shotgun sequencing and compare those to dogs with oral tumors. Oral swabs (representative of all niches of the oral cavity) were collected from healthy dogs (n = 24) and from dogs with different oral tumors (n =...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anja Lisjak, Bruna Correa Lopes, Rachel Pilla, Ana Nemec, Jan S. Suchodolski, Nataša Tozon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-11-01
Series:Animals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/13/23/3594
_version_ 1797400538357170176
author Anja Lisjak
Bruna Correa Lopes
Rachel Pilla
Ana Nemec
Jan S. Suchodolski
Nataša Tozon
author_facet Anja Lisjak
Bruna Correa Lopes
Rachel Pilla
Ana Nemec
Jan S. Suchodolski
Nataša Tozon
author_sort Anja Lisjak
collection DOAJ
description The aim of this study was to further describe the oral microbiota of healthy dogs by DNA shotgun sequencing and compare those to dogs with oral tumors. Oral swabs (representative of all niches of the oral cavity) were collected from healthy dogs (n = 24) and from dogs with different oral tumors (n = 7). DNA was extracted from the swabs and shotgun metagenomic sequencing was performed. Only minor differences in microbiota composition were observed between the two groups. At the phylum level, the Bacteroidota, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteriota, Desulfobacterota and Firmicutes were most abundant in both groups. Observed Operational Taxonomic Units—OTUs (species richness) was significantly higher in the healthy patients, but there was no significant difference in the Shannon diversity index between the groups. No significant difference was found in beta diversity between the groups. The core oral microbiota consisted of 67 bacterial species that were identified in all 24 healthy dogs. Our study provides further insight into the composition of the oral microbiota of healthy dogs and in dogs with oral tumors.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T01:56:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ad4d6cd550c84fc8a210c92a38017964
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-2615
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T01:56:32Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Animals
spelling doaj.art-ad4d6cd550c84fc8a210c92a380179642023-12-08T15:10:24ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152023-11-011323359410.3390/ani13233594A Comparison of the Oral Microbiota in Healthy Dogs and Dogs with Oral TumorsAnja Lisjak0Bruna Correa Lopes1Rachel Pilla2Ana Nemec3Jan S. Suchodolski4Nataša Tozon5Small Animal Clinic, Veterinary Faculty, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, SloveniaGastrointestinal Laboratory, Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USAGastrointestinal Laboratory, Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USASmall Animal Clinic, Veterinary Faculty, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, SloveniaGastrointestinal Laboratory, Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine & Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USASmall Animal Clinic, Veterinary Faculty, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, SloveniaThe aim of this study was to further describe the oral microbiota of healthy dogs by DNA shotgun sequencing and compare those to dogs with oral tumors. Oral swabs (representative of all niches of the oral cavity) were collected from healthy dogs (n = 24) and from dogs with different oral tumors (n = 7). DNA was extracted from the swabs and shotgun metagenomic sequencing was performed. Only minor differences in microbiota composition were observed between the two groups. At the phylum level, the Bacteroidota, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteriota, Desulfobacterota and Firmicutes were most abundant in both groups. Observed Operational Taxonomic Units—OTUs (species richness) was significantly higher in the healthy patients, but there was no significant difference in the Shannon diversity index between the groups. No significant difference was found in beta diversity between the groups. The core oral microbiota consisted of 67 bacterial species that were identified in all 24 healthy dogs. Our study provides further insight into the composition of the oral microbiota of healthy dogs and in dogs with oral tumors.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/13/23/3594oral microbiotaDNA shotgun sequencingoral tumorsoral swabbiopsydogs
spellingShingle Anja Lisjak
Bruna Correa Lopes
Rachel Pilla
Ana Nemec
Jan S. Suchodolski
Nataša Tozon
A Comparison of the Oral Microbiota in Healthy Dogs and Dogs with Oral Tumors
Animals
oral microbiota
DNA shotgun sequencing
oral tumors
oral swab
biopsy
dogs
title A Comparison of the Oral Microbiota in Healthy Dogs and Dogs with Oral Tumors
title_full A Comparison of the Oral Microbiota in Healthy Dogs and Dogs with Oral Tumors
title_fullStr A Comparison of the Oral Microbiota in Healthy Dogs and Dogs with Oral Tumors
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of the Oral Microbiota in Healthy Dogs and Dogs with Oral Tumors
title_short A Comparison of the Oral Microbiota in Healthy Dogs and Dogs with Oral Tumors
title_sort comparison of the oral microbiota in healthy dogs and dogs with oral tumors
topic oral microbiota
DNA shotgun sequencing
oral tumors
oral swab
biopsy
dogs
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/13/23/3594
work_keys_str_mv AT anjalisjak acomparisonoftheoralmicrobiotainhealthydogsanddogswithoraltumors
AT brunacorrealopes acomparisonoftheoralmicrobiotainhealthydogsanddogswithoraltumors
AT rachelpilla acomparisonoftheoralmicrobiotainhealthydogsanddogswithoraltumors
AT ananemec acomparisonoftheoralmicrobiotainhealthydogsanddogswithoraltumors
AT janssuchodolski acomparisonoftheoralmicrobiotainhealthydogsanddogswithoraltumors
AT natasatozon acomparisonoftheoralmicrobiotainhealthydogsanddogswithoraltumors
AT anjalisjak comparisonoftheoralmicrobiotainhealthydogsanddogswithoraltumors
AT brunacorrealopes comparisonoftheoralmicrobiotainhealthydogsanddogswithoraltumors
AT rachelpilla comparisonoftheoralmicrobiotainhealthydogsanddogswithoraltumors
AT ananemec comparisonoftheoralmicrobiotainhealthydogsanddogswithoraltumors
AT janssuchodolski comparisonoftheoralmicrobiotainhealthydogsanddogswithoraltumors
AT natasatozon comparisonoftheoralmicrobiotainhealthydogsanddogswithoraltumors