Hölder, Mach, and the Law of the Lever: A Case of Well-founded Non-controversy

Otto Hölder’s reply to Mach’s renowned critique of the Archimedean proof of the Law of the Lever is analyzed and contextutalized as part of Hölder’s epistemological theory. The proof of the Law of the Lever provided for Hölder a case study on deduction in mechanics. He developed in it an original un...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Oliver Schlaudt
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Éditions Kimé 2013-03-01
Series:Philosophia Scientiæ
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/philosophiascientiae/830
_version_ 1797402554461585408
author Oliver Schlaudt
author_facet Oliver Schlaudt
author_sort Oliver Schlaudt
collection DOAJ
description Otto Hölder’s reply to Mach’s renowned critique of the Archimedean proof of the Law of the Lever is analyzed and contextutalized as part of Hölder’s epistemological theory. The proof of the Law of the Lever provided for Hölder a case study on deduction in mechanics. He developed in it an original understanding of proof as a constructive, synthetical process leading to higher order concepts. This enabled him to avoid the view held by Mach that proof can only lead to analytic truths, and to defend Archimedes against Mach’s critique.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T02:26:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-ad51f2a096714dec90848638b6175b16
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1281-2463
1775-4283
language deu
last_indexed 2024-03-09T02:26:00Z
publishDate 2013-03-01
publisher Éditions Kimé
record_format Article
series Philosophia Scientiæ
spelling doaj.art-ad51f2a096714dec90848638b6175b162023-12-06T15:54:17ZdeuÉditions KiméPhilosophia Scientiæ1281-24631775-42832013-03-011719311610.4000/philosophiascientiae.830Hölder, Mach, and the Law of the Lever: A Case of Well-founded Non-controversyOliver SchlaudtOtto Hölder’s reply to Mach’s renowned critique of the Archimedean proof of the Law of the Lever is analyzed and contextutalized as part of Hölder’s epistemological theory. The proof of the Law of the Lever provided for Hölder a case study on deduction in mechanics. He developed in it an original understanding of proof as a constructive, synthetical process leading to higher order concepts. This enabled him to avoid the view held by Mach that proof can only lead to analytic truths, and to defend Archimedes against Mach’s critique.http://journals.openedition.org/philosophiascientiae/830
spellingShingle Oliver Schlaudt
Hölder, Mach, and the Law of the Lever: A Case of Well-founded Non-controversy
Philosophia Scientiæ
title Hölder, Mach, and the Law of the Lever: A Case of Well-founded Non-controversy
title_full Hölder, Mach, and the Law of the Lever: A Case of Well-founded Non-controversy
title_fullStr Hölder, Mach, and the Law of the Lever: A Case of Well-founded Non-controversy
title_full_unstemmed Hölder, Mach, and the Law of the Lever: A Case of Well-founded Non-controversy
title_short Hölder, Mach, and the Law of the Lever: A Case of Well-founded Non-controversy
title_sort holder mach and the law of the lever a case of well founded non controversy
url http://journals.openedition.org/philosophiascientiae/830
work_keys_str_mv AT oliverschlaudt holdermachandthelawoftheleveracaseofwellfoundednoncontroversy