Attention to Monocular Images Bias Binocular Rivalry
When monocular images cannot be fused, perception alternates between the two (or more) possible images. This phenomenon, binocular rivalry (BR), is driven by the physical properties of the stimuli (size, contrast, spatial frequency, etc.) but it can also be modulated by attention to features of one...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019-03-01
|
| Series: | Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnsys.2019.00012/full |
| _version_ | 1818338060427853824 |
|---|---|
| author | Manuel Moreno-Sánchez J. Antonio Aznar-Casanova Fernando Valle-Inclán |
| author_facet | Manuel Moreno-Sánchez J. Antonio Aznar-Casanova Fernando Valle-Inclán |
| author_sort | Manuel Moreno-Sánchez |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | When monocular images cannot be fused, perception alternates between the two (or more) possible images. This phenomenon, binocular rivalry (BR), is driven by the physical properties of the stimuli (size, contrast, spatial frequency, etc.) but it can also be modulated by attention to features of one of the rival stimuli (Chong et al., 2005; Dieter et al., 2016) and by attentional demands independent of the BR assessment (Paffen et al., 2008). Instead of the perceptually demanding tasks previously used to bias BR, we designed a simple counting task. We monocularly presented a number of trials (around 10 min) with a set of symbols and asked participants to count them. We found that after this task, dominance durations decreased for the unattended channel, and did not change for the attended channel. The results parallel those of Paffen et al. (2008) and square nicely with Levelt’s second proposition, suggesting that the counting task effectively increased the sensibility of one channel which led to increased strength of the images presented to that channel. Alternatively, the results could be explained assuming that the non-attended channel was inhibited during the counting task, and the inhibition was carried over to the BR task. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-13T15:05:06Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-ad59c8db23c94427b14394fabfef7252 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1662-5137 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-13T15:05:06Z |
| publishDate | 2019-03-01 |
| publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience |
| spelling | doaj.art-ad59c8db23c94427b14394fabfef72522022-12-21T23:41:02ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience1662-51372019-03-011310.3389/fnsys.2019.00012427659Attention to Monocular Images Bias Binocular RivalryManuel Moreno-Sánchez0J. Antonio Aznar-Casanova1Fernando Valle-Inclán2Department of Cognitive Processes, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, SpainDepartment of Cognitive Processes, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, SpainDepartment of Psychology, Universidad de La Coruña, La Coruña, SpainWhen monocular images cannot be fused, perception alternates between the two (or more) possible images. This phenomenon, binocular rivalry (BR), is driven by the physical properties of the stimuli (size, contrast, spatial frequency, etc.) but it can also be modulated by attention to features of one of the rival stimuli (Chong et al., 2005; Dieter et al., 2016) and by attentional demands independent of the BR assessment (Paffen et al., 2008). Instead of the perceptually demanding tasks previously used to bias BR, we designed a simple counting task. We monocularly presented a number of trials (around 10 min) with a set of symbols and asked participants to count them. We found that after this task, dominance durations decreased for the unattended channel, and did not change for the attended channel. The results parallel those of Paffen et al. (2008) and square nicely with Levelt’s second proposition, suggesting that the counting task effectively increased the sensibility of one channel which led to increased strength of the images presented to that channel. Alternatively, the results could be explained assuming that the non-attended channel was inhibited during the counting task, and the inhibition was carried over to the BR task.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnsys.2019.00012/fullvisual awarenessvisual attentionbinocular rivalryendogenous attentionattention |
| spellingShingle | Manuel Moreno-Sánchez J. Antonio Aznar-Casanova Fernando Valle-Inclán Attention to Monocular Images Bias Binocular Rivalry Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience visual awareness visual attention binocular rivalry endogenous attention attention |
| title | Attention to Monocular Images Bias Binocular Rivalry |
| title_full | Attention to Monocular Images Bias Binocular Rivalry |
| title_fullStr | Attention to Monocular Images Bias Binocular Rivalry |
| title_full_unstemmed | Attention to Monocular Images Bias Binocular Rivalry |
| title_short | Attention to Monocular Images Bias Binocular Rivalry |
| title_sort | attention to monocular images bias binocular rivalry |
| topic | visual awareness visual attention binocular rivalry endogenous attention attention |
| url | https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnsys.2019.00012/full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT manuelmorenosanchez attentiontomonocularimagesbiasbinocularrivalry AT jantonioaznarcasanova attentiontomonocularimagesbiasbinocularrivalry AT fernandovalleinclan attentiontomonocularimagesbiasbinocularrivalry |